Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-31 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Allie, On 30-10-2004 14:25, you [AM] wrote in : AM> I dislike the CC as a separate Window. It's one of those aspects of AM> TB! that I've never taken to. Me too. I liked it the way it was in Eudora 4 (the last version I used). I have CTRL+SHIFT+1 to show and CTRL+SHIFT+2 t

Re[2]: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-31 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Chris, On Saturday, October 30, 2004 09:04 your local time, which was 08:04 my local time, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote; CW> Just received an "AV @ 009A2810 - Read of address 00B8". I've just received this AV again. It seems to happen just after starting and pressing Alt-F2 to check all accoun

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Martin Webster
Allie Martin [AM], wrote: >> Not the Delete Task button but the Del key for Delete Request. AM> You do this with the CC in focus, I assume. Never thought of trying AM> that. Yes, I click on the task bar, select the IMAP request that's stalled and hit Del. I rather not have to do this but it do

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Saturday, October 30, 2004 at 5:10:55 PM [GMT -0500], Martin Webster wrote: AM>> Is it the Del task in the CC? > Not the Delete Task button but the Del key for Delete Request. You do this with the CC in focus, I assume. Never thought of trying that. AM>> I dislike the CC as a separate Window

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Martin Webster
Allie Martin [AM], wrote: >> I was going to add to my message (above quote) that an IMAP task >> sometimes gets stuck causing congestion. I usually use Del to remove >> the task and things speed up again. BTW, I only syncronise on headers. AM> Is it the Del task in the CC? Not the Delete Task

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Martin Webster
Allie Martin [AM], wrote: >> I was going to add to my message (above quote) that an IMAP task >> sometimes gets stuck causing congestion. I usually use Del to remove >> the task and things speed up again. BTW, I only syncronise on headers. AM> Is it the Del task in the CC? AM> I dislike the

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Saturday, October 30, 2004 at 3:34:22 PM [GMT -0500], Peter Ouwehand wrote: AM>> I forgot the shortcut that toggles it in and out of view. > Set to always hide, then Shift-Ctrl-R. It needs a menu item or button. If you haven't used it for a while, you forget it. -- -= Allie =- . Reality

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
Communication center hangs on - after recieving the last msg it is still present and TB! must be killed. Best regards, Krzysztof Kudlacik -- pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! | /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl | /'.'; `-,`-""-',-' ;`.`\

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Tero Ripattila
Dear 9Val, --On 29. lokakuuta 2004 23:43 +0300 9Val <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just finished uploading .2.4 Only change - some fixes in IMAP synchronization problems reported by Allie and Martin This build is a total fiasco for me: UI never gets accessible before AVs crashes TB! :-( Plea

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Saturday, October 30, 2004 at 8:28:25 AM [GMT -0500], Allie_M wrote: >> Yes. There is an entry in the BT for this >> > I'll run the CC for a while and see if I have many queued processes > during these wait periods. Yes. I can confirm your 'bug',

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Saturday, October 30, 2004 at 6:38:51 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: > Yes. There is an entry in the BT for this > I'll run the CC for a while and see if I have many queued processes during these wait periods. -- -= Allie =- . Any phil

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Allie Martin
On Saturday, October 30, 2004 at 5:22:39 AM [GMT -0500], Martin Webster wrote: > I was going to add to my message (above quote) that an IMAP task > sometimes gets stuck causing congestion. I usually use Del to remove > the task and things speed up again. BTW, I only syncronise on headers. Is it t

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Allie, On 30-10-2004 01:08, you [AM] wrote in : AM> Can anyone else confirm these pauses in smooth browsing of messages? Yes. There is an entry in the BT for this -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.2.4 Rush Pro ~18 P

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Martin Webster
Martin Webster [MW], wrote: MW> Yes, I experience this quite often... frequently seeing "No message MW> loaded" in the message viewer or an IMAP . Also, I can be moving from one message MW> to another when TB! will disconnect from the server. Ha! I didn't accidently hit send yesterday... I pres

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Martin Webster
Allie Martin [AM], wrote: AM> Though I'm no longer getting AV's, I've not been happy with TB! IMAP for AM> the last betas here. Normally, once I enter a folder, I can read all AM> unseen mail quite quickly. Now, I'd be moving from message to message AM> and then out of the blue, the next message

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-30 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi 9Val, On Friday, October 29, 2004 23:43 your local time, which was 21:43 my local time, 9Val [9] wrote; 9> Just finished uploading .2.4 Only change - some fixes in IMAP 9> synchronization problems reported by Allie and Martin Just received an "AV @ 009A2810 - Read of address 00B8

Re: 3.0.2.4 [Was: Re: IMAP: new revision]

2004-10-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Saturday, October 30, 2004 at 1:33:25 AM [GMT -0500], Jonathan Angliss wrote: > On reopening TB, it took well over 15 minutes to even read my first > email... I'm guessing it was off synchronizing itself, and ignoring > all user requests. I see you're having the same problem, though more sever

3.0.2.4 [Was: Re: IMAP: new revision]

2004-10-29 Thread Jonathan Angliss
> Hello All, > > Just finished uploading .2.4 Only change - some fixes in IMAP > synchronization problems reported by Allie and Martin I've been snowed under with work, and my beta folder has nearly 500 unread messages in, so I'm playing some serious catch up. Just installed 3.0.2.4, op

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-29 Thread Clive Taylor
> Can anyone else confirm these pauses in smooth browsing of messages? Yes, but because this has always been my experience of TB's IMAP working I hadn't noticed a further slowing of message collection - but I think you're right about this, Allie. -- Regards Clive Taylor Using TB 3.0.2.2 Rush

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Friday, October 29, 2004 at 3:43:50 PM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote: > Just finished uploading .2.4 Only change - some fixes in IMAP > synchronization problems reported by Allie and Martin Though I'm no longer getting AV's, I've not been happy with TB! IMAP for the last betas here. Normall

Re: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-29 Thread Martin Webster
9Val [9], wrote: 9> Just finished uploading .2.4 Only change - some fixes in IMAP 9> synchronization problems reported by Allie and Martin Cheers 9Val! So far so good... reported problems with syncronise, check mail etc. gone. I'll do some more testing tomorrow. -- .\\artin | ICQ 15

IMAP: new revision

2004-10-29 Thread 9Val
Hello All, Just finished uploading .2.4 Only change - some fixes in IMAP synchronization problems reported by Allie and Martin -- 9Val Current beta is 3.0.2.3 Rush | 'Using TBBETA'