Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello 9Val. --On 26 May 2005 00:11 +0300 you wrote about Re: IMAP Fine Tune?: > Correct, but needs additional info - it works when you switch from one > IMAP folder to another (in the same account). Not sure what you mean by "needs additional info"? It may work next time I

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hi 9Val, --<> 26.05.2005 00:27 +0300: BTW - nice to see that you're back. :) I'm not, just couldn't resist to comment :-) Hard life as a developer! :D Thank god I'm studying the right thing - software engineering. ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Manuel. --On 25 May 2005 23:05 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?: > 1024 kbit/s downstream, 128 kbit/s upstream. So mine should delete them twice as fast :) -- Tony. M. pgpBzRYcVn3Mf.pgp Description: PGP signat

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Manuel, MB> Okay, correct. Thank you for the extra information. MB> BTW - nice to see that you're back. :) I'm not, just couldn't resist to comment :-) -- 9Val

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hi 9Val, --<> 26.05.2005 00:11 +0300: Compress in TB! is Expunge in Mulberry. That should do as explanation. ;) MB> TB! deletes all messages which are marked as deleted, when you switch to MB> another folder. Correct, but needs additional info - it works when you switch from one IMAP folder

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Manuel, >> In IMAP Fine tune is a tick box "Compress Folders when switching to >> another folder" MB> Compress in TB! is Expunge in Mulberry. That should do as explanation. ;) MB> TB! deletes all messages which are marked as deleted, when you switch to

Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hi Tony, --<> 25.05.2005 21:58 +0100: Maybe you have a faster connection than me, 2Mb Broad Band? 1024 kbit/s downstream, 128 kbit/s upstream. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBBETA' infor

Re: Mod: HTML use (was: IMAP Fine Tune?)

miércoles, 25 may 2005 at 22:48, it seems you wrote: > Hello? Is there anyone in there? Am I talking to myself??? Direct private mail to him? -- /\/ Using The Bat! 3.5.0.17 Professional / \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 1) /\/ e t \/

Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Manuel. --On 25 May 2005 22:44 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?: > Strange, isn't it?! Maybe you have a faster connection than me, 2Mb Broad Band? -- Tony. M. pgp5i26BLItx2.pgp Description: PGP s

Re: Re[4]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Gleason. --On 25 May 2005 13:43 -0700 you wrote about Re[4]: IMAP Fine Tune?: > Not sure when they are being deleted. > > Not reliably when switching folders, or when closing TB. But > > they do get deleted at some point. It's the "at some point" that

Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hi Tony, --<> 25.05.2005 21:37 +0100: Yes it does. Hmm, fine. But that's what the check box is for, to automate that process, to delete them as soon as you close or switch a folder. That's how I'd like it to work anyway. Yeah, you're fully right. That *has* to work. I just checked in wi

Re[4]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Tony, >> Not confirmed.  When I open Mulberry, I do not see deleted messages >> waiting to be expunged.  Mulberry agrees with TB as to what folder >> contents are. > That's not how it happens here. I've gone back to a folder an hour after > switching and still been able to browse deleted mess

Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Manuel. --On 25 May 2005 22:27 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?: > That's really strange and not good. Does manually "Compress + Purge" > (right-click on folder) help? Yes it does. But that's what the check box is for, to automate that process,

Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hi Tony, --<> 25.05.2005 21:09 +0100: That's not how it happens here. I've gone back to a folder an hour after switching and still been able to browse deleted messages. That's really strange and not good. Does manually "Compress + Purge" (right-click on folder) help? -- Manuel, http://ww

Re: Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Gleason. --On 25 May 2005 12:30 -0700 you wrote about Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?: > Not confirmed. When I open Mulberry, I do not see deleted messages > waiting to be expunged. Mulberry agrees with TB as to what folder > contents are. That's not how it happens here. I

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Clive. --On 25 May 2005 20:30 +0100 you wrote about Re: IMAP Fine Tune?: > Is the text struck (stricken, striked?) through on these messages in > Mulberry, Tony? That's what happens here if I delete messages from TB. Yes they are, that's exactly what happens. But that

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hi Tony, --<> 25.05.2005 20:11 +0100: Compress in TB! is Expunge in Mulberry. That should do as explanation. ;) TB! deletes all messages which are marked as deleted, when you switch to another folder. Well it's not working, AT ALL! This is one of THE MAIN reasons I have absolutely no conf

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Tony, Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 8:02:34 PM, you wrote: > They are all still there! And when I open Mulberry all the mail I > deleted and supposedly compressed with TB is still there, exactly > where I didn't think I'd left it. Is the text struck (stricken, striked?) through on these message

Re[2]: IMAP Fine Tune?

Tony, >> Compress in TB! is Expunge in Mulberry. That should do as explanation. ;) >> TB! deletes all messages which are marked as deleted, when you switch to >> another folder. > Well it's not working, AT ALL! This is one of THE MAIN reasons I have > absolutely no confidence whatsoever in TB's

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Tony, A reminder of what Tony Boom on TBBETA typed on: 25 May 2005 at 21:03:49 GMT +0200 > and when I choose "Browse deleted messages" They > are all still there! I forgot to say as well. The Bat filters all my mail from the inbox to other folders, nothing strange about that. What

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello Manuel, A reminder of what Manuel Breitfeld on TBBETA typed on: 25 May 2005 at 20:53:16 GMT +0200 > Compress in TB! is Expunge in Mulberry. That should do as explanation. ;) > TB! deletes all messages which are marked as deleted, when you switch to > another folder. Well it's not wor

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

Hi Tony, --<> 25.05.2005 19:48 +0100: In IMAP Fine tune is a tick box "Compress Folders when switching to another folder" Compress in TB! is Expunge in Mulberry. That should do as explanation. ;) TB! deletes all messages which are marked as deleted, when you switch to

IMAP Fine Tune?

Hello TBBETA, In IMAP Fine tune is a tick box "Compress Folders when switching to another folder" What is it meant to do? -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.0.17 Windows XP Home SP2 Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org pgpHT4BJd90Mn.pgp D

Re: IMAP Fine Tune - Reserve One Connection...

Hello Gary, Monday, April 25, 2005, 10:07:13 AM, you wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:15:49 -0500 UTC (4/25/2005, 9:15 AM -0600 UTC my > time), Jonathan Angliss wrote in part: J>> multiple IMAP connections, I decided to enable 2 connections. Can J>> anybody confirm that enabling mo

Re: IMAP Fine Tune - Reserve One Connection...

Hi Jonathan, On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:15:49 -0500 UTC (4/25/2005, 9:15 AM -0600 UTC my time), Jonathan Angliss wrote in part: J> multiple IMAP connections, I decided to enable 2 connections. Can J> anybody confirm that enabling more than one connection does NOT allow J> you to select the "Reserve a

Re: IMAP Fine Tune - Reserve One Connection...

Hey Manuel, it's me again,... just now (on 04/25/2005 at 16:22) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes, this one was discussed some time ago. As far as I remember, 9Val > could confirm and explain this situation. > Perhaps anyone has the pointing mid. ;) Okay, okay,... I've found it. ,-[ 9Val, mid:

Re: IMAP Fine Tune - Reserve One Connection...

Hello Jonathan, just now (on 04/25/2005 at 16:15) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can anybody confirm that enabling more than one connection does > NOT allow you to select the "Reserve a connection for mail > retrieval"? > http://thebat.netdork.net/acct_imap_opt.png Yes, this one was discussed so

IMAP Fine Tune - Reserve One Connection...

Hey Guys, Because I know my IMAP server, and I know the connections I am using, and I know that the server, and connection can handle me running multiple IMAP connections, I decided to enable 2 connections. Can anybody confirm that enabling more than one connection does NOT allow you to select the

Re: IMAP fine tune - cosmetic glitch

Hi, Chris wrote: > Can anyone else confirm? Confirmed. Regards, Markus Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link fi

Re: IMAP fine tune - cosmetic glitch

Chris, On 02-12-2004 08:46, you [CW] wrote in : CW> On looking at the fine tune options, I spotted a cosmetic glitch CW> (see attached). CW> Can anyone else confirm? Yup. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Excha

Re: IMAP fine tune - cosmetic glitch

hello there! CW> Hi all, CW> On looking at the fine tune options, I spotted a cosmetic glitch (see CW> attached). CW> Can anyone else confirm? confirmed! yours, dave -- Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 _

IMAP fine tune - cosmetic glitch

Hi all, On looking at the fine tune options, I spotted a cosmetic glitch (see attached). Can anyone else confirm? -- Regards, Chris Created using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 OS of Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Cleaning up SPAM with Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.0<>