Hello tbbeta,
So, I reset my IMAP account, and did this:
Manage IMAP folders, Reset list, and I checked Subscribed and
Synchronize (Headers only) for all of my mailbox, which are:
Inbox.Test (now I have only one from it :)
Drafts
Sent Mail
Spam (my provider makes a spam filtering too)
Trash
I c
Hello tbbeta,
Sorry, if I am boring you guys...
So: I logged in to my IMAP account on the web. It shows 100 mails, all
read in my inbox. This is exactly what I see in my IMAP log. BUT: 96
messages show up in my Inbox, only, in TB!
What is wrong, my syncronization? I selected Headers only a
--On 5/07/2005 14:03 -0400 Vili wrote:
So, summary: IMAP is unuseful, really, as far as I see... The logic is
ok, but it is unreliable
Welcome to the dark side! You will now be told by a number of users that
there is no problem with TB's IMAP and that it's your fault/your
computer/your ma
Hello tbbeta,
I wrote: "My online Drafts folder shows 2 mails. My local, that is
assigned to Inbox.Drafts on the IMAP server, shows nothing..."
My log shows:
"IMAP - 1: The folder "INBOX.Drafts" selected. 0 recent, 0 unread out
of 2 total messages"
So, where is that 2 mails? It seems, that the s
Hello tbbeta,
I wrote:
> "My online Drafts folder shows 2 mails. My local, that is
> assigned to Inbox.Drafts on the IMAP server, shows nothing..."
> My log shows:
> "IMAP - 1: The folder "INBOX.Drafts" selected. 0 recent, 0 unread out
> of 2 total messages"
> So, where is that 2 mails? It seems,
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 2:05:38 PM, Clive Taylor wrote:
> it's your fault/your computer/your mail server etc. Well... we
> know better don't we.
No, I don't think we know anything one way or the other. Debugging is
about considering all the possibilities. Not about oneupspersonship.
--
Dwi
--On 5 July 2005 14:54:51 -0500 Dwight A Corrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not about oneupspersonship.
I'm so glad I got a Mac, it looks like PC has really gone mad :)
--
Tony.
i.
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 2:57:43 PM, Tony Boom wrote:
>> Not about oneupspersonship.
> I'm so glad I got a Mac, it looks like PC has really gone mad
Just thought it was about the right time of day to try coining a new
word. Guess it needed a smiley?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichi
Hello Clive,
Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 9:05:38 PM, you wrote:
CT> Welcome to the dark side! You will now be told by a number of users that
CT> there is no problem with TB's IMAP and that it's your fault/your
CT> computer/your mail server etc. Well... we know better don't we.
It even gets worse. S
--On 5 July 2005 15:17:15 -0500 Dwight A Corrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just thought it was about the right time of day to try coining a new
word. Guess it needed a smiley?
It needed something, punctuation or hyphenation, it took me two minutes to
work out what it said...
Good stuff th
--On 5/07/2005 14:54 -0500 Dwight wrote:
Debugging is
about considering all the possibilities. Not about oneupspersonship.
Sorry, that doesn't make any sense at all to me.
--
Clive Taylor
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' informa
--On 5/07/2005 22:36 +0200 Mark wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if more and more providers
will take a similar decision leaving only specialised companies offering
it (for an extra charge).
I don't know where you're based Mark (Belgium?) but here in the UK I'm not
aware of any mainstream ISP o
Hello Clive,
Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 11:37:20 PM, you wrote:
CT> I don't know where you're based Mark (Belgium?)
Yes
CT> but here in the UK I'm not aware of any mainstream ISP
CT> offering IMAP mail services.
Tiscali did offer it, but their belgian division has been sold to Scarlet
that does no
Hello Clive,
> --On 5/07/2005 14:03 -0400 Vili wrote:
>> So, summary: IMAP is unuseful, really, as far as I see... The logic is
>> ok, but it is unreliable
> Welcome to the dark side! You will now be told by a number of users that
> there is no problem with TB's IMAP and that it's your fault/y
Hello Clive,
> Welcome to the dark side!
One more sentence: I dont mind to be there, if we are CONSTRUCTIVE.
--
Vili
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To r
Hello Clive,
> --On 5/07/2005 22:36 +0200 Mark wrote:
>> I wouldn't be surprised if more and more providers
>> will take a similar decision leaving only specialised companies offering
>> it (for an extra charge).
> I don't know where you're based Mark (Belgium?) but here in the UK I'm not
> aware
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, at 02:10 PM, Vili wrote:
> My goal is to UNDERSTAND the differences between my system and their
> system. This is how a bug can be caught
For me, it's one of not using the Inbox.draft as my Outbox. While
using TB! in its current state of development, a server side Out
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, at 02:17 PM, Vili wrote:
> My log shows:
> "IMAP - 1: The folder "INBOX.Drafts" selected. 0 recent, 0 unread out
> of 2 total messages"
> So, where is that 2 mails? It seems, that the server send the info,
> that this mailbox has 2 mails, I have seen "2" for a sec besid
Hello Vili,
V> "IMAP - 1: The folder "INBOX.Drafts" selected. 0 recent, 0 unread out
V> of 2 total messages"
That's verbose log of IMAP session. Servers always include deleted
message count in report, so their _plain_ counters are useless in
case of not expunged folder.
V> 9Val: do yo
19 matches
Mail list logo
