Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Tero Ripattila
Hello Paul, --On 13. lokakuuta 2004 16:32 +0100 "Paul White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote: I think you'll end up with what is now known as Secure Bat. I wish I had done the same for just an extra $10.00. I'm glad that I did buy the Professional licence :-) Six weeks of bug-fixing has certainly resto

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Dennis Hays
Quoting Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In other words, I saw it as an opportunity to support RitLabs > in the > face of all the bashing the company was taking at the time, > on-line, > in the TB! lists, and in Private Mails to me. > I have to agree with Mary on this. I also consider any email c

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Nick Andriash
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, at 7:58:53 AM, Roelof wrote: > Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're using > TB for business. I don't believe it has anything to do with business or home use, rather the Pro version is supposed to take the place of the current SecureBat th

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Paul White
On Wednesday, 13 October 2004 at 16:24 (UK time), Mary Bull said: > I bought the Professional license, not because I plan to use it in > business, but simply because I am actually able to afford it and I > think it may have some features added down the road which I might > wish, in the future, to

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hallo shemming, On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:31:52 +0100GMT (13-10-2004, 14:31 +0100, where I live), you wrote: S> Am I right in thinking that there's still no practical difference S> between these 2 products? The reason I bought the professional edition is (extra) security. I am still waiting.. --

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roelof! On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 10:15 AM, you wrote: RO>>> Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're RO>>> using TB for business. SH>> Obiously, but that wasn't the point, was it? RO> OK, but the other side is that $10,00 isn't a very substantial RO> amount o

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Stuart, On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:56:41 +0100GMT (13-10-2004, 16:56 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO>> Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're using RO>> TB for business. SH> Obiously, but that wasn't the point, was it? OK, but the other side is that $10,00 isn't a

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Stuart Hemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 RO> Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're using RO> TB for business. Obiously, but that wasn't the point, was it? - -- :Stuart_Hemming: Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marcus, On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:46:53 +0200GMT (13-10-2004, 16:46 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MO> If this is already stated at the site I apologise, but at least I could MO> not find it at a first look. Neither could I. -- Groetjes, Roelof WinErr: 010 Reserved for future mistakes by

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 16:37, Roelof Otten wrote: SH>> That's what I though. It's a bit steep asking people to pay an SH>> extra $10 for the pleasure of /just/ a name though, isn't it? > Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're using > TB for business. I was abou

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Stuart, On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:16:27 +0100GMT (13-10-2004, 16:16 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PF>> Yes. Still - but things have been promised to change SH> That's what I though. It's a bit steep asking people to pay an extra SH> $10 for the pleasure of /just/ a name though, isn't it? W

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Stuart Hemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PF> Yes. Still - but things have been promised to change That's what I though. It's a bit steep asking people to pay an extra $10 for the pleasure of /just/ a name though, isn't it? - -- :Stuart_Hemming: Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Bui

Re: Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread Peter Fjelsten
shemming, On 13-10-2004 14:31, you [sec] wrote in : sec> Am I right in thinking that there's still no practical difference sec> between these 2 products? Yes. Still - but things have been promised to change -- Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Se

Pro vs Home

2004-10-13 Thread shemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am I right in thinking that there's still no practical difference between these 2 products? - -- :Stuart_Hemming: Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.3 PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pg