Re[2]: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

In reply to : JW> I doubt this. Had they known it, they would have fixed it. It turns >> out to be an elusive bug, as some encounter it and others don't. JW> Thomas, perhaps it is just a bug. But even if it was just a bug, JW> why did RL lose sight of their goal to

Re: Re[2]: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

On 7/18/05, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > Monday, July 18, 2005, 11:58:56, you wrote: > > >>With an introduction like that - and with the > >>BayesIt problem still unresolved - who would imagine that we would be > >>embarking on an entirely new series of beta (pardon, me, alpha) > >>testing of a very ri

Re[2]: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

Hello Jay, Monday, July 18, 2005, 11:58:56, you wrote: >>With an introduction like that - and with the >>BayesIt problem still unresolved - who would imagine that we would be >>embarking on an entirely new series of beta (pardon, me, alpha) >>testing of a very risky nature? Do you mean the BayesI

Re: Re[2]: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

On 7/18/05, Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you sure you are cut out for testing software? Testing software? Yes. Testing a RitLabs email client? I am not sure any longer... for the reasons stated in my initial message on this thread. The simple fact is that I cannot afford to have

Re[2]: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

Good day beta list members, Monday, July 18, 2005, 9:58:56 AM, you wrote: > On 7/18/05, Natasha V Pearce wrote: >> been taken out of context, but if you feel I've misquoted you and/or >> quoted >> them in a misleading or otherwise inappropriate manner, please feel free >> to >> send d

Re[2]: 3.51, Communication, and the Ethics of Beta Testing

Good day, Natasha. NVP> ICAM. You're free to choose whichever level of TB suits your NVP> current needs. To NVP> help you make this decision, RL posts, on a daily basis, NVP> all their fixes at NVP> and in addition NVP> po

Re[2]: 3.51: AV when deleting attachment

Hello Mary, >> Is "Attach files at sending" checked? > I can't find this option. Where is it located? Account, Properties, Files and directories, Bind attachment only at sending (or something similar). > I attached the various .jpegs and .pngs using the drop-down menu in > Utilities: "Attach File

Re[2]: 3.51: AV when deleting attachment

Hello Mary, >> When writing an e-mail just a while ago I attached another one as >> .eml and then decided to delete the attachment. When doing so I got >> the attached AV. I have not been able to reproduce it so far. > This has happened to me several times, but it happened so infrequently > and so

Re[2]: 3.51

miércoles, 6 jul 2005 at 16:34, it seems you wrote: > 1) If you are spanish but don't want any other language you are out of > luck. You have to install all of them > Me I want English. I do _not_ american, however Spanish is useful at times. You could get English+Spanish only in http://www.gdut

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Dimitry, Thursday, July 7, 2005, 9:16:57 AM, you wrote: > It's probably checking the Certificate Revocation List. It is by any > chance "crl.verisign.com", or a similar name? Don't honestly recall. I did the whois on the IP when installing Garmin CitySelect v6 a couple days back, and saw th

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Eugene, >>> Please download 3.51 which is a replacement of 3.5.xx. >>> It fixes charset issues of the latest 3.5.xx ZW>> First of all, Exchange connection problems are fixed! > No, they aren't. The Bat! 3.51 still fails to open my Exchange message store: > 07.07.2005, 17:06:59: FETCH -

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello James, Thursday, July 7, 2005, 5:46:03 AM, you wrote: JJW> On 7/7/05, Allie Martin wrote: >> Men don't experience that .. JJW> Well, I'll have to confirm this with Tony. He has been clarifying a JJW> lot of such matters for me lately. JJW> But thanks for your specification of gender. All

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Thorvald, haven't seen you for quite a while, where have you been? Thursday, July 7, 2005, 7:44:50 AM, you wrote: > Does anybody know why msiexec.com tried to access the internet three > times while installing the 3.51-MSI? My firewall blocked these attempts > and it installed fine. It tr

Re[2]: 3.51

7/6/2005 8:16 PM Hi Ron, On 7/6/2005 Ron Secord wrote: RS> Any chance of getting an .rar file to download? I can't even get the RS> .msi to start. Something might have damaged your MSIexec files. Check the information at: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyI

Re: Re[2]: 3.51

--On 6 July 2005 22:32:54 +0300 Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's because you already have The Bat! on your hard disk, Why won't you answer me? I've asked a few very on topic, very relevant questions and I get no answer at all. No need to answer that, I already know why. -

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Alexander, Wednesday, July 06, 2005, 18:40:21, you wrote: >>One minor issue - the installer thinks that the core parts of TB require >>357kB on the HDD. That's because you already have The Bat! on your hard disk, it won't need much space to update the files, this is quite normal. -- Best

Re: Re[2]: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:02 PM, Manuel Breitfeld > wrote: > > > The effect that I would recommend the following numbering system doesn't > > change anything, however I just want to write it down. ;) I would recommend > > to have a majo

Re[2]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 02:02 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > The effect that I would recommend the following numbering system doesn't > change anything, however I just want to write it down. ;) I would recommend > to have a major number and two minor numbers separated by a dot. v3.50 ->> v

Re: Re[2]: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 01:48 PM, Manuel Breitfeld > wrote: > > > Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that it's > > not > > always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did point out. > > CVS's numbe

Re[2]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 01:48 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that it's not > always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did point out. > CVS's numbering system for instance goes like this 1.1 ... 1.9 1.10 >

Re: Re[2]: 3.51

--On 6 July 2005 12:11:08 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In the IMAP fine tune, there's an option to test the IMAP connection. What happens when you run the test? The test button is beside the connection number setting. It starts counting down from 30 to 1, tells me everything

Re[2]: 3.51

Het was op woensdag 6 juli 2005 om 19:08 uur dat jij iets schreef over '3.51' : Hallo Mike, M> ¿Why is it that numlock must be on in order for ¡The Bat! to accept M> alt-codes? you should complain to Bill G. for that, NOT the RitLabs guys. ~:) -- regards, Cees Forget about the dog, b

Re[2]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Tony Boom wrote: > Well I probably don't but if 10 connections are available and TB only uses > 6 then the other four are spare just in case. I don't want to speak too > soon but apart from the cache problem doubling everything up, things seem > OK so

Re[2]: 3.51

On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 10:20 AM, Tony Boom wrote: > I can't be doing with this. I'm trying to play fair, done everything that > you lot suggested and then some but TB just won't play cricket! In the IMAP fine tune, there's an option to test the IMAP connection. What happens when you ru

Re[2]: 3.51

Het was op woensdag 6 juli 2005 om 18:00 uur dat jij iets schreef over '3.51' : Hallo Dwight, >> ¿ funny DAC> ¿If I recall my Spanish correctly, this isn't funny, but necessary DAC> isn't it? Spanish is all Greek to me -- regards, Cees l'enfère c'est les autres - Jean-Paul Sartre _

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Tony, >> What is that for? > Correcting bad English, you should try it sometime :) ??? > It's used to reformat paragraphs when you add bits and take bits away. > MicroEd don't auto wrap so I use ALT+L. Shoot... :)) I know that, I a using (ok, Alt+J) all the time, I thought, it i

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Tony, > PS: Don't ya just love ALT+L :) What is that for? -- Vili Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Tony, > A reminder of what Tony Boom on TBBETA typed on: > 06 July 2005 at 15:44:19 GMT +0100 >> Time will tell but I'm hopeful. > So far so good except one thing, I'm getting double of everything that > comes in. The main inbox count shows the true message count but the actual > fol

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Tony, >> Wouldn't it be better if we would ask Mrs. Boom to send you back to the >> factory for a major revision? > You can ask her but she'll tell you there is nothing wrong with my blood > supply, it's still pumping to all the right places :) There is a Hungarian term about you, Tony

Re[2]: 3.51

Het was op woensdag 6 juli 2005 om 17:04 uur dat jij iets schreef over '3.51' : Hallo Mark, MB>> How did you get that upside down question mark? Spanish is also useful MB>> here at times. MP> Alt + 0191 ¿ ¿ funny :) but at least I know how to get an upside down 9 6 :rofl2: -- regard

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello David, >>> Nice to see the spam filter back in the msi, It is a shame that I still >>> have to install all the languages. >> ?? Why do you have to?? I unchecked That... > ¿ Are you serious ? (there we go again.) > 1) If you are spanish but don't want any other language you are out of > luck

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Tony, > IMAP fine tune, I increased connections to 10 and refresh folder > every 20 seconds instead of minutes. Hmm... I dont know. It surely helps, but I dont have to be this drastic to make my IMAP work :))) -- Vili Current

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello David, > Nice to see the spam filter back in the msi, It is a shame that I still > have to install all the languages. ?? Why do you have to?? I unchecked that... -- Vili Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http:/

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Tony, > A reminder of what Vili on TBBETA typed on: > 06 July 2005 at 09:57:15 GMT -0400 >> So, did that suggestion work? > Er, what suggestion was that, refresh my memory? :) I wrote it ca. 3 times :)) Anyway: Account, Properties, Mail management, When inactive, disconnect after th

Re: Re[2]: 3.51

On 7/6/05, Cees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Het was op woensdag 6 juli 2005 om 15:40 uur dat jij iets schreef over '3.51' > : > AY> My only reservation is about your numbering system. To go from 3.5.36 > AY> to 3.51 is a jump of about 46 version numbers for no obvious reason. > AY> It seems mo

Re[2]: 3.51

Hello Tony, > It must be a typo? Surely that should say.. > We will proceed to other fixes and *then* update the web site? Tony, as other also wrote, you dont answer my question/suggestion that was to fix your "No message loaded" problem... So, did that suggestion work? -- Vili __

Re[2]: 3.51

Het was op woensdag 6 juli 2005 om 15:40 uur dat jij iets schreef over '3.51' : Hallo Avi, AY> My only reservation is about your numbering system. To go from 3.5.36 AY> to 3.51 is a jump of about 46 version numbers for no obvious reason. AY> It seems more logical for this to be a 3.6, which wo