martes, 1 nov 2005 at 08:43, it seems you wrote:
Macro is just another option for better flexibility (e.g. adding it to AB
templates). As you know, some macro options can be set separately from
template.
I guess, the folder to store replies in should be set at the same page where
reply
Hello MAU,
No that's OK, thanks for the offer. It would just teach me how to use
another workaround, and that was not the point of my message. The
point was that workarounds shouldn't be necessary. As long as they
are, I cannot recommend TB.
No, I'm not suggesting or pointing a workaround. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31 Oct 2005, at 23:20, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
So does terrorism. That doesn't mean it's a good thing.
Have you any idea how many people have asked RL to release MicroEd as
a separate stand alone text editor? I for one and dozens of others
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
What advantages does this system yield?
C Do we really have to go through this again. It was all discussed
C months ago.
Please remember that it wasn't me who rekindled the discussion, I was
just reminding that the issue is still not solved.
But here,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
ASK So far, it is you alone who wants MicroEd to behave differently.
Don't give me that.
How many people on this list wanted the UI updates when the
developement started for v3.5.x? Almost noone, all complained about
unfixed bugs that should have been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
ASK Yes, so please file the feature request
This _is_ a feature request!
ASK welcome to my ignore filter!
Oh. Now you've gotten me - I'll have to think about suicide or
something.
- -- MfG, AS mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Tuesday, November 01, 2005 02:12 PM +0100 Alto Speckhardt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now you want to tell me that because most of the experts
participating in this list have adjusted to the TB-way it was ok to
the standard user?
I now find some common ground with you.
I agree that
Het was op dinsdag 1 november 2005 om 15:30 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'About release' :
Hoi Alexander,
AGH Du bringst mich an den Rand des Wahnsinns!
ASK AGH this should've been a PM. I forgot to adjust the recipient and
ASK accidentally sent it to the list. Sorry sorry sorry.
Het was op maandag 31 oktober 2005 om 9:06 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'About
release' :
Hoi Tony,
why do we need computers, when we have pencil, paper, and morse code?
TB And I'm fluent in morse code... Or I used to be a few years ago.
right, Inspector Morse, I presume? :)
--
groeten,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31 Oct 2005, at 08:12, Cees wrote:
right, Inspector Morse, I presume? :)
But do you know my first name?
- --
Tony Boom
PGP http://www.theboomclan.com/tbc.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.2 (Build 2425)
Comment:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
You also have to finally adress age-old bugs like the
MicroEd-EOL-handling. This also remains open since v1, despite
massive discussions on this list.
ASK Thats not a bug, thats a feature [...]
As has been established quite extensivly it might be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
AS You also have to finally adress age-old bugs like the
AS MicroEd-EOL-handling. This also remains open since v1, despite
AS massive discussions on this list.
TF Please refresh my memory. I have no EOL problem in MicroEd.
With auto format enabled MicroEd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
Let's not start this whole discussion all over again
ASK No one mentioned it during the last months, you did. Go figure.
ASK :-)
It's still not fixed. Once I hoped it might come around just by
itself, but it didn't. The time seemed apropriate to remind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
With auto format enabled MicroEd is unable to distinguish between
two following lines that are not seperated by a third containing
only a return.
ST This is because [...]
Please excuse me, but we had all this in abundant detail a few months
ago. I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
It's still not fixed.
ST There is nothing to fix - this has been repeated hundreds of
ST times. MicroEd works as designed.
So does terrorism. That doesn't mean it's a good thing.
- -- MfG, AS mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
ST It's not TB's behaviour, it's MicroEd's behaviour. If you don't
ST like MicroEd's behaviour, you can use Windows editor.
The windows-editor doesn't know a thing about quote handling,
reformating or many other features intrinsic for writing emails.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
It's still not fixed.
ST There is nothing to fix - this has been repeated hundreds of
ST times. MicroEd works as designed.
ST AFAIK, lots of people like it. No matter what parallels you draw.
That's why I'm suggesting to make it switchable, not to abolish
Hi,
Take the editor of any other email-program: Every one of those
performs adequate in this matter, with no problems at all.
ST Do they provide quote handling and reflowing the same way MicroEd
ST does?
Not exactly. They do it right.
I have an editor here from a mailbox net that received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
The problem is rather that MicroEd removes hard-CRs. If it would
just leave them where I type them there would not be a problem.
C It doesn't recognise your hard-CR's differently from the ones it
C inserts itself.
I see, but this is definitly wrong
Hello Stefan,
things may be found in previous messages in TBBETA). I am sorry for lack of
communication with testers and users, but it takes really long time and we
have
too much job to do and, as I told you before, we are limited in resources.
Thanks for this honest mail.
--
Vili
The Bat
Hello Dwight,
which development process was interrupted by... fancy tabs.
I was begging since v.1 for better ways to deal with flagged and
parked messages and consider the tabs as a long overdue correction of
a missing feature, not a fancy addition.
Agreed. Message list tabs are VERY
Hello Michael,
in September 2003. But absolutely unusable. Some improvements since then
(and one fullprice upgrade)
Upgrade is 50%. And why did you pay it, if it was not worth it???
--
Vili
The Bat 3.62.08 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 1
Hello Michael,
in September 2003. But absolutely unusable. Some improvements since then
(and one fullprice upgrade)
Upgrade is 50%. And why did you pay it, if it was not worth it???
Improvements were made, more were promised and there was a thought which
sounds like ok. they get their chance
Alexander,
I'm puzzled - again. Just from looking at the sheer number of coders that
are assigned to BT reports (9Val, VV, Maxim, Diman, you... forgot someone
for sure, sorry), I always thought there were many programmers, and that
*this* is the reason why fancy features make it into the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30 Oct 2005, at 18:40, Gleason Pace wrote:
My only request is that one day I
should have a TB that really works well.
www.theboomclan.com/wish.gif
- --
Tony Boom
PGP http://www.theboomclan.com/tbc.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Hello Michael,
Someone does not answer other parts of the mail, because agrees with
that, dont you think. But lets be explicite:
Oh, I apologize :-)
I made other experiences with other users so I misunderstood you.
No problem. :)
--
Vili
The Bat 3.62.08 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag
Hello MAU,
Ask any software developers, if they agree with this statement you
quoted or not.
I have been in software development since 1968. Yes, 1968. :)
Then I would be ashamed, if I were you, if you agree with that
showstopper statement... No offense MAU, I really
Hello Mark,
V Again: you, me, beta list members can live with these bugs. But
V not an enduser. He should not be faced any of them...
Most of the time they aren't. And as for:
Chinese letters in Scheduler, Message tab misery, crash after Language
change are IN FRONT of a user...
V I am
Hello Thomas,
1.) If you have more than 10 filter conditions, you will have to wait
several seconds (several minutes in case of 100 filter conditions)
Curiosity: is there ANY email client, that can handle this much filter
condition?
--
Vili
The Bat 3.62.07 on Windows XP 5.1 2600
Hello Alexander,
I repeat my proposal that there should be a more intensive dialogue between
Ritlabs and the users, at least the beta testers.
Well said. We dont need email in every minute. RL hurts itself with
these bugs and this kind of handle of our feedback :(( Or lack of
feedback,
Hello MAU,
All of them is very obvious bugs :((
But, do you really consider any of them as showstoppers?
Let's put it this way: if I am proud of the software I am writing,
yes, they are.
--
Vili
Current beta is 3.62.03 | 'Using
Hello MAU,
All of them is very obvious bugs :((
But, do you really consider any of them as showstoppers?
Let's put it this way: if I am proud of the software I am writing,
yes, they are.
,- [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Showstopper ]
| In software development, a showstopper is a
32 matches
Mail list logo
