Hello Peter,
Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:14:49 PM, you wrote:
PF> Hmm, I am often using remove duplicates without having all "versions"
PF> disappear.
It is only after a purge that the message on the server disappears
and then with a second purge the original message in the local cache
disap
On 30 January 2006 at 17:58, Stuart wrote:
> I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates.
> Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
> are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete
> one of the messages, manually or by using Delet
Hello Stuart,
SC>> Testing duplicates.
> I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates.
> Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
> are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete
> one of the messages, manually or by using Delete D
Hello 9Val,
A reminder of what 9Val typed on:
Saturday, January 28, 2006 at 17:24:07 GMT +0200
SC>> Testing duplicates.
9> Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
Sorry it is not completely fixed. I just received 3 new IMAP TB!
messages and one of them has a duplicate. In trying to mar
Hello Dwight,
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 11:29:58 PM, you wrote:
DAC> I marked your test message unread, making it the only unread message
DAC> in my account. I then hit alt-f2, which checks mail for all accounts
DAC> and did not duplicate your complaint.
DAC> I don't understand why you are usin
Hello Curtis,
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 8:19:30 PM, you wrote:
>> Testing duplicates.
C> Have you done any cleaning of the local cache?
C> I haven't seen duplicates in a long time.
Could you check as described in my just sent message. I can reproduce
as described in that message.
--
Stu
6 matches
Mail list logo
