Re[2]: test creating @thebat.net

2007-10-07 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Perry, Sunday, October 07, 2007, 20:16:58, you wrote: >>Now that I've reported the success of this test would you please explain >>*why* we are creating this account? Does this have something to do with >>further beta testing of version 4.0? Account creation wizard in V4 will allow to creat

Re[2]: test creating @thebat.net

2007-10-07 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Richard, Sunday, October 07, 2007, 18:23:57, you wrote: >>Tried again just because I had a couple of free minutes and I've finally >>been successful! Don't know why but it's worked. I now have an account. If somebody could not login properly, that was probably because of session informatio

Re[2]: test creating @thebat.net

2007-10-07 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Richard, Sunday, October 07, 2007, 17:16:14, you wrote: >>That's the one I'm using. I can log into the bugtrack with no problem >>but this page - absolutely nothing :-( Unfortunately, the bugtracker has different login databse, opposing to the rest of www.ritlabs.com -- Best regards, Max

Re[2]: test creating @thebat.net

2007-10-07 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Richard, Sunday, October 07, 2007, 13:08:07, you wrote: >>Same here. My old address was [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the new one is >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] The e-mail address is not used at all to login to www.ritlabs.com. Please see my previous reply to TBBETA: the login to www.ritlabs.com has noth

Re[2]: test creating @thebat.net

2007-10-06 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Henk, Sunday, October 07, 2007, 9:31:49, you wrote: >>Access denied Whoever gets this error, please send me your login name to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , I will check this issue. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re[2]: test creating @thebat.net

2007-10-06 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Ian, Sunday, October 07, 2007, 8:59:19, you wrote: >>I am not getting that error, but no matter what I try I get Access >>Denied. I have gone through the lost password process and my username >>is correctly identified, but no matter what I do I cannot get through. What is your login name on

Re[2]: test creating @thebat.net

2007-10-06 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Charlene, Saturday, October 06, 2007, 23:27:41, you wrote: >>> https://www.ritlabs.com/en/thebat.net/3.php >>> https://www.ritlabs.com/de/thebat.net/3.php >>> https://www.ritlabs.com/ru/thebat.net/3.php >>I took the second one and tried to register and got >>Fatal error: Call to undefined f

Re[2]: test creating @thebat.net

2007-10-06 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Thomas, Saturday, October 06, 2007, 23:15:44, you wrote: >>I thought so. Does one of the pages below work properly? https://www.ritlabs.com/en/thebat.net/3.php https://www.ritlabs.com/de/thebat.net/3.php https://www.ritlabs.com/ru/thebat.net/3.php -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin

Re[2]: test creating @thebat.net

2007-10-06 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Thomas, Saturday, October 06, 2007, 23:00:16, you wrote: >>Sorry is that realy you Maxim? TheBat.net is a spammer adress. Please >>calrify. http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/news_detail.php?ID=1599 -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Test

2006-07-12 Thread Vili
Hello Alexander, >> Do you forgive me now? > Not while you're using Thunderbird! ;-) :))) Point goes to Alexander :)) Curtis: it was not a problem for me, I just asked. How could I be mad at you, when we share the same name... My last name, Kertesz is pronounced as Curtis in the US (I am n

Re[2]: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Peter, Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:14:49 PM, you wrote: PF> Hmm, I am often using remove duplicates without having all "versions" PF> disappear. It is only after a purge that the message on the server disappears and then with a second purge the original message in the local cache disap

Re[2]: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Terry
On 30 January 2006 at 17:58, Stuart wrote: > I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates. > Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they > are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete > one of the messages, manually or by using Delet

Re[2]: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Vili
Hello Stuart, SC>> Testing duplicates. > I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates. > Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they > are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete > one of the messages, manually or by using Delete D

Re[2]: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-28 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello 9Val, A reminder of what 9Val typed on: Saturday, January 28, 2006 at 17:24:07 GMT +0200 SC>> Testing duplicates. 9> Could you check if issue was solved in .06? Sorry it is not completely fixed. I just received 3 new IMAP TB! messages and one of them has a duplicate. In trying to mar

Re[2]: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-27 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Dwight, Thursday, January 26, 2006, 11:29:58 PM, you wrote: DAC> I marked your test message unread, making it the only unread message DAC> in my account. I then hit alt-f2, which checks mail for all accounts DAC> and did not duplicate your complaint. DAC> I don't understand why you are usin

Re[2]: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-26 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Curtis, Thursday, January 26, 2006, 8:19:30 PM, you wrote: >> Testing duplicates. C> Have you done any cleaning of the local cache? C> I haven't seen duplicates in a long time. Could you check as described in my just sent message. I can reproduce as described in that message. -- Stu

Re[2]: Test, please ignore

2005-11-29 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy George, Friday, November 25, 2005, 7:50:38 PM, George wrotened: GMM> Hello George, GMM> Friday, November 25, 2005, 9:46:12 PM, you wrote: >> I moved my lists to gmail and i want to make sure that all things work. >> Thank you for your patience GMM> I passed the test! Hurray! Nah you on

Re[2]: test

2005-11-09 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Vili, Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 5:03:27 AM, Vili wrotened: V> Hello Cees, >> I'm having problems connecting to my mailserver V> You dont have to use this list to test it... Write your own address as V> the recipient... Or perhaps he wants to test to see how many silly mails he c

Re[2]: Test: Could someone reply

2005-08-26 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Liz, Friday, August 26, 2005, 8:20:04 AM, you wrote: > In the message which was > apparently written on Friday, August 26, 2005, 2:09:21 PM. I believe you > wrote: SC>> Testing IMAP server filter, with TB local filter for adding color SC>> grouping. > WOOF Well this conversat

Re[2]: Test x-rogue

2005-07-07 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Mary, Thursday, July 7, 2005, 11:51:02 AM, you wrote: > BTW, today is Leif's birthday! :happybirthday: , Leif!! Perhaps we > could get him to amend the code as a birthday present to all of us > Roguemoticon and Smiley aficionados! Don't look at me.. I didn't write the code in TB as to where

Re[2]: Test x-rogue

2005-07-07 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Mary, Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 5:39:05 PM, you wrote: > I was in PM with Leif (on whose server PCWize runs) over the > weekend. It's been going down every few days. I'm going to CC this > to him, in case he hasn't noticed yet that it's out again. G. That's it. I need to pull that box do

Re[2]: Test x-rogue

2005-07-06 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Bill, A reminder of what Bill McCarthy typed on: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 18:17:27 GMT -0500 BM> I will try to remember to look for that zip file - the BM> site: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat is currently BM> unavailable. Use this: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip

Re[2]: Test x-rogue

2005-07-06 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Bill, A reminder of what Bill McCarthy typed on: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 at 15:45:29 GMT -0500 >> X-rogue test, beware. BM> What is with the x-rogue stuff? I checked the help BM> file for both "rogue" and "x-rogue" - there is no such BM> thing. BM> I did see the following line in

Re[2]: Test

2005-06-10 Thread harlekin
This macro is intended to run so that the message format is changed to the given format wanted. So when you add for example MFORMAT="HTML" in the template, when you create a new message or answer a message then the message you create is automatically set for message format HTML. Does it matter i

Re[2]: Test

2005-06-09 Thread harlekin
Many thanks for the quick answer! Will do this right away!! -- using TB! 3.5.26 OS: Windows XP Build 2600 with Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMP

Re[2]: Test

2005-06-09 Thread harlekin
Would love to add it! Where is this wishlist? :) Or just post in this mailing list a new thread? Thanks! -- using TB! 3.5.26 OS: Windows XP Build 2600 with Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://w

Re[2]: Test

2005-06-08 Thread harlekin
LOL :) Thanks... now should be better. Is there a Macro that can be added to a template to set the message format to MicroEd Text? -- using TB! 3.5.26 OS: Windows XP Build 2600 with Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TB

Re[2]: Test from GMail

2005-02-22 Thread Gmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > You need to get yourself a certificate from thawte or verisign and then > enable > smime in Account Properties Options. I see that you're using a Thawte certificate. What document did you use when registering for it? I'm not too comfortable using

Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-22 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Thorvald, Just wondering why your reply to George contains TBUDL in the To: header as well as the tbbeta address, when it was originally from tbbeta. Again, just wondering as it broke my thread color. :( -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5

Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-19 Thread Paul Van Noord
11/19/04 6:56 AM Received From: Tony Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Avi, A reminder of what Avi Yashar on TBBETA typed on: 19 November 2004 at 12:24:45 GMT +0200 > So I am also not a happy camper on this point Then do as I have done and write directly to Gmail Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Re

Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread rmorris
Hello Thorvald, Thursday, November 18, 2004, 7:22:00 AM, you wrote: TN> Thursday, November 18, 2004, 09:49, Peter Hampf wrote: >> Connection: "Secure to dedicated port 465". And "use settings of mail >> retrieval". That does work here just fine. TN> Why did they wrote port 587 on Gmail's website?

Re: Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Avi Yashar
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:49:27 +0100, Peter Hampf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Connection: "Secure to dedicated port 465". And "use settings of mail > retrieval". That does work here just fine. That's what I use. And it works fine for me too. -- Avi Yashar Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro 3.0.

Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Peter Hampf
Hello Thorvald, on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:45:16 +0100 GMT your local time you wrote: TN> POP works, but what settings do I have to use for SMTP? TN> I tried TLS to port 587 and entered the specific details under Perform TN> SMTP authentication/Use specific settings... Connection: "Secure to dedica

Re: Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-17 Thread Avi Yashar
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:52:40 -0600, Ricardo Marte wrote: > To see the message in your Inbox, you need to make your gmail address > the sole recipient of the TO: e-mail field. You can then CC: or BCC: > anyone else. I tried this with a few of my accounts and am trying it > more globally with this

Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-17 Thread Ricardo Marte
Hello Avi, Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 8:55:57 AM, you wrote: > Actually, Tony, this is one of the intentional quirks of Gmail. Here > is how the Gmail support staff explain it: > ~~~ > Mail you send to yourself only appears in your inbox when you are the so

Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-16 Thread Paul Van Noord
11/16/04 9:42 PM Hi Allie, Thanks for fixing my ignorance! I never knew TLS and SSL were synonymous! Take Care, Paul >=== Original Message Below ===< > Received From: Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Van Noord wrote: > How is it configured? I have been a user since 1998 a

Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-16 Thread Paul Van Noord
11/16/04 9:03 PM Hi Allie, How is it configured? I have been a user since 1998 and have never found a way to configure SSL. Take Care, Paul >=== Original Message Below ===< > Received From: Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Van Noord wrote: > When will The Bat! be able to

Re[2]: Test release.

2004-02-17 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Dear Peter, PG> OK, I realize that the IMAP issues with the attachments are not going PG> to be fixed, Hmm. Which ones you mean exactly? PG> but please, please, PLEASE fix the new bug with the toolbar icons PG> staying If grey when the new mail arrives in the folder. It worked PG> fine before RC

Re[2]: test

2003-03-08 Thread Cees Schouten (regards from Rubeo!)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo Martin, Op een zaterdag 8 maart 2003 om 21:43:49 schreef jij over "test": >> test GnuPG MS> My GnuPG says: MS> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found still struggling with the stuff; but created a new keyset (my third or

Re[2]: Test message

2001-03-25 Thread Cees Schouten
Hallo Kevin, Op Sunday, March 25, 2001, om 7:11:00 PM, schreef jij een en ander over 'Test message' : ACM>> This is just a test message for the list which seems to have been ACM>> down. KC> Your test message made it through, but there doesn't seem to be any KC> other activity. At least that'