Re: UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Edvinas, On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:19:44 +0300 GMT (19/07/2005, 13:19 +0700 GMT), Edvinas Matiušaitis wrote: EM> What editor did you use? If your "Language for non unicode EM> applications" is set to something different than Thai, then you EM> must use Windows style editor for thai letters. I

Re: UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-18 Thread Edvinas Matiušaitis
Hello Thomas, On Monday, July 18, 2005, at 17:20, you wrote: TF> I see. I tried to include some Thai characters in a previous message TF> (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]), but they didn't display as TF> such, though. What editor did you use? If your "Language for non unicode applications" is set to somet

Re: UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Edvinas, On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:55:26 +0300 GMT (18/07/2005, 13:55 +0700 GMT), Edvinas Matiušaitis wrote: EM> You won't get utf-8 encoding unless use at least one character EM> outside us-ascii charset. There's no need to use utf-8 if all EM> characters fall into us-ascii. By the way, the s

Re: UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-17 Thread Edvinas Matiušaitis
Hello Thomas, On Sunday, July 17, 2005, at 07:47, you wrote: TF> My previous messages should have written in Unicode with MicroEd but TF> arrived as us-ascii. also in the Sent folder it shows us-ascii. So I TF> am trying again whether this arrives in UTF-8. You won't get utf-8 encoding unless us

Re: UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Thomas, On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:51:45 +0700 GMT (17/07/2005, 12:51 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> Hm. Again the message was composed with UTF-8 in MicroEd but sent as TF> us-ascii. So, the encoding in MicroEd is not implemented at all yet, TF> it just looks this way when composing m

Re: UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Thomas, On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:47:16 +0700 GMT (17/07/2005, 11:47 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> My previous messages should have written in Unicode with MicroEd but TF> arrived as us-ascii. also in the Sent folder it shows us-ascii. So I TF> am trying again whether this arrives in

Re: UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Stefan, On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:47:28 +0300 GMT (16/07/2005, 21:47 +0700 GMT), Stefan Tanurkov wrote: >> However, when a UTF-encoded message arrives, the viewer will still >> switch from PTV to RTV. ST> MicroEd doesn't really support Unicode now - that's why viewing is ST> done with PTV. Y

Re: UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-16 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Thomas, > However, when a UTF-encoded message arrives, the viewer will still > switch from PTV to RTV. MicroEd doesn't really support Unicode now - that's why viewing is done with PTV. However, it's possible it will be rewritten from scratch during next months to support Unicode and some ot

UTF encoding (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello 9Val, On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 22:49:29 +0300 GMT (16/07/2005, 02:49 +0700 GMT), 9Val wrote: 9> The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available from: 9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ I can now create UTF-8 encoded messages using MicroEd. That is nice. The editor looks as usual, with my plain-text / fixed-

Re: Server turnaround time (was: Re: UTF encoding)

2000-04-24 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
nts on the subject MDP> of "Server turnaround time (was: Re: UTF encoding)": TF>>> Received: from ns2.dutaint.com [203.130.233.13] by in1.prserv.net TF>>> id 956560460.184186-1 ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 07:14:25 + TF>>> Received: from ho.bhakti.co.id by thebat

Re: Server turnaround time (was: Re: UTF encoding)

2000-04-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 09:52:14 +0100GMT (24/04/2000, 16:52 +0800GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP> We don't have too :-) it's clearly visible in the headers. Thanks :-) "Clearly visible"? Ah, sure. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.41 under Chinese W

Re: Server turnaround time (was: Re: UTF encoding)

2000-04-24 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, On 24 April 2000 at 16:26:33 GMT +0800 (which was 09:26 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Server turnaround time (was: Re: UTF encoding)": TF>> Received: from ns2.dutaint.com [203.130.233.13] by in1.prserv.net TF>>

Server turnaround time (was: Re: UTF encoding)

2000-04-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
gt; Organization: E-mailaholics International TF> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) TF> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TF> To: "Alexander V. Kiselev on TBBETA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TF> Subject: Re: UTF encoding TF> In-reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TF> References: <

Re[2]: UTF encoding (was:Re: 1.42 Beta/19 is now available)

2000-04-24 Thread tracer
Hello TF>> Chinese TF>> characters starting after the third "f", but the very last character TF>> is an lower-case o-umlaut. Obviously the translation worked in the TF>> attachment but not in the message body. Hmmm. Thomas I send you an email I received in Thai off list which seems to confirm th

Re: UTF encoding

2000-04-24 Thread tracer
Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 04:06:07 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Monday, April 24, 2000, 3:06:07 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Hallo tracer, > thanks for the HTML attachment in Thai, but it displayed as Chinese > characters. I assume the reason

Re[3]: UTF encoding

2000-04-24 Thread tracer
24 Apr 00, at 4:06, Thomas Fernandez wrote AVK>> about "UTF encoding": >>> thanks for the HTML attachment in Thai, but it displayed as Chinese >>> characters. I assume the reason is that there is no header in your >>> message saying: >>> >&

Re: UTF encoding

2000-04-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Alexander, On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 02:24:21 +0400GMT (24/04/2000, 06:24 +0800GMT), Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >> Pardon me? >> I lost the thread a bit. >> >> IIRC, Thomas got from me one UTF-7 + one UTF-8 messages, which >> displayed but without high-characters. Alexander sent him a non-UTF

Re: UTF encoding

2000-04-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Alexander, On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 02:24:21 +0400GMT (24/04/2000, 06:24 +0800GMT), Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >> IIRC, Thomas got from me one UTF-7 + one UTF-8 messages, which >> displayed but without high-characters. Alexander sent him a non-UTF >> encoded HTML attachment, which was in Thai

Re: UTF encoding

2000-04-23 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 23 Apr 00, at 23:15, SyP wrote about "Re[2]: UTF encoding": > Pardon me? > I lost the thread a bit. > > IIRC, Thomas got from me one UTF-7 + one UTF-8 messages, which > displayed but without high-characters. Alexander sent him a non-UTF > encoded H

Re[2]: UTF encoding

2000-04-23 Thread SyP
Hello The Bat! beta users and developers, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote at 4/23/2000, 10:46 PM AVK> Hi there! AVK> On 24 Apr 00, at 4:06, Thomas Fernandez wrote AVK> about "UTF encoding": >> thanks for the HTML attachment in Thai, but it displayed as Chinese &g

Re: UTF encoding

2000-04-23 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 24 Apr 00, at 4:06, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "UTF encoding": > thanks for the HTML attachment in Thai, but it displayed as Chinese > characters. I assume the reason is that there is no header in your > message saying: > > Content-Type: text/plain;

UTF encoding

2000-04-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo tracer, thanks for the HTML attachment in Thai, but it displayed as Chinese characters. I assume the reason is that there is no header in your message saying: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" That I got from SyP and it worked. Below is your header showing content-type but

Re: UTF encoding (was:Re: 1.42 Beta/19 is now available)

2000-04-22 Thread SyP
Hello The Bat! beta users and developers, Thomas Fernandez wrote at 4/22/2000, 8:39 AM ST>>> [*] UTF-7 and UTF-8 "character sets" should be supported TF> Where do I find this? When I right-click on a message, and choose TF> character set, I can see a list of character sets which does not TF>

UTF encoding (was:Re: 1.42 Beta/19 is now available)

2000-04-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dirk, On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:36:11 +0200 GMT (22.04.2000, 02:36 +0800 GMT), Dirk Heiser wrote: ST>> [*] UTF-7 and UTF-8 "character sets" should be supported Where do I find this? When I right-click on a message, and choose character set, I can see a list of character sets which does not