Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

--On 3 July 2005 16:47:07 +0100 Tony Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: His mail always threads fine here. I lied, they used to but I found a few that don't. -- Tony. i. Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://ww

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

--On 30 June 2005 19:40:47 +0200 Martin Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't want to point my finger at Vili ;-) but do you others also get his mails not threading? His mail always threads fine here. -- Tony. i. Current be

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

On Friday, July 01, 2005 at 6:47:25 PM [GMT -0500], Miguel Urech wrote: >> but it lacked features I needed. > For example? This is off-topic, but alas, you're not on TBOT so... :( -- -= Allie Martin =- The Bat! v3.5.36 System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name -=-=- God I want patien

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Allie, You wrote about Mercury/32: > but it lacked features I needed. For example? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5.0.31 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 3.5.36 | '

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Marck, >>> like Mercury 32 for example? > MAU>> Great piece of software, isn't it? > > :-s no idea. Never used it. > Then I should say: Great piece of software, believe me :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5.0.31 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Dear Vili, @1-Jul-2005, 10:12 -0400 (01-Jul 15:12 UK time) Vili [V] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: V> I fired up TB! with GMail on the machine I did not have SMTP access, V> it works fine with GMail's own SMTP server :)) ... and you're threaded!!! ;-) -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlston

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Boris Anders & everyone else, on 01-Jul-2005 at 11:39 you (Boris Anders) wrote: >> Circumstances like Vili's were the original idea for a combined >> threading mode, we have it now in the most recent version, so I dare say >> that you're not exactly in the best position to argue or complain

OT: Divorce (Was: Vili's Mails not threaded)

Hello MAU, Mau wrote (in ): > Do you have a stomach ulcer or are you perhaps going through a divorce? Maybe the last one, but I need first a new "women", before I kick TB! in trash. -- Regards, Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de _

Re[2]: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Marck, >>> like Mercury 32 for example? MAU>> Great piece of software, isn't it? > :-s no idea. Never used it. I fired up TB! with GMail on the machine I did not have SMTP access, it works fine with GMail's own SMTP server :)) Yah... :)) Thanks guys for enlighten me :)) -- Vili

Re[2]: Vili's Mails not threaded

On Friday, July 01, 2005, at 07:43 AM, MAU wrote: >> like Mercury 32 for example? > Great piece of software, isn't it? For freeware ... indeed it is. I preferred MDaemon though. Don't get me wrong, it's nicely modular and *fast*, but it lacked features I needed. But it's very good at what it's

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Boris, > Please enlight me again, why would one want to know which version of TB > I use? Isn't it my thing? I always regarded you as a reasonable person, but seeing your latest posts I'm beginning to wonder why I had that impression. Do you have a stomach ulcer or are you perhaps going t

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Dear Miguel, @1-Jul-2005, 14:43 +0200 (01-Jul 13:43 UK time) MAU [MAU] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: >> like Mercury 32 for example? MAU> Great piece of software, isn't it? :-s no idea. Never used it. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.5.

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Marck, > like Mercury 32 for example? Great piece of software, isn't it? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5.0.31 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBE

Re[2]: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Marck, MDP> @1-Jul-2005, 13:23 +0200 (01-Jul 12:23 UK time) Vili [VS] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: VS ... I have tried using TB! with a local SMTP server, but it cannot VS send emails to the tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com address. MDP> ... VS>> WinXP Home, and Free SMTP S

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Dear Vili, @1-Jul-2005, 13:23 +0200 (01-Jul 12:23 UK time) Vili [VS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: VS>>> ... I have tried using TB! with a local SMTP server, but it cannot VS>>> send emails to the tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com address. ... VS> WinXP Home, and Free SMTP Server, program home

Re[2]: Vili's Mails not threaded

VS>> ... I have tried using TB! with a local SMTP server, but it cannot VS>> send emails to the tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com address. It just VS>> hangs there... Maybe the moderators/list owners know the answer... MDP> Tell us more. What server? What software? I run my own server here and MDP> have no

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Alexander, Alexander Kunz wrote (in ): > Circumstances like Vili's were the original idea for a combined > threading mode, we have it now in the most recent version, so I dare > say that you're not exactly in the best position to argue or complain. There's no doubt a

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Vili, > Please let me explain my situation. Completely accepted ;-). And let me also point out that my initial mail was not intended to criticize you (or even say you should not post to the list), but just to find out if some of my settings were wrong, or maybe even my server would fil

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Dear Vili, @1-Jul-2005, 03:37 +0200 (01-Jul 02:37 UK time) Vili [VS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Martin: VS> I send you this in private also, to be sure you get it. I got it! ;-) ... VS> ... I have tried using TB! with a local SMTP server, but it cannot VS> send emails to the tbbeta@theb

Re[2]: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Boris, Thursday, June 30, 2005, 10:59:51 PM, you wrote: >> Wouldn't it help to set the viewmode for the mailinglist to thread by >> reference+subject? > Maybe, but this isn't possbile in 3.0.1 RC6, is it? Circumstances like Vili's were the original idea for a combined threading mode, we h

Re: SOT: Re[2]: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Leif, LG> Thursday, June 30, 2005, 12:26:29 PM, you wrote: >> Obvious you would. I can only speak for me; and I'd prefer that he >> don't post such mails. But I can't do anything against it and so >> I've to accept it :-(. LG> Are broken threads irritating, yes, but as a moderator and as a f

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Martin and Boris and Marck, I send you this in private also, to be sure you get it. As you can see now, I am using TB!. Correct threading. Please let me explain my situation. Now, for a while I dont have access to a true SMTP server daytime. (I use a normal provider at the evenings.

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Alexander, Alexander Kunz wrote (in ): >>> I don't want to point my finger at Vili ;-) but do you others also get >>> his mails not threading? >> Yes, very very annoying!!! Reason is that the references are missing - >> so if you answer to such a mail, your reference

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Boris Anders & everyone else, on 30-Jun-2005 at 20:10 you (Boris Anders) wrote: >> I don't want to point my finger at Vili ;-) but do you others also get >> his mails not threading? > Yes, very very annoying!!! Reason is that the references are missing - > so if you answer to such a mail,

Re: SOT: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Leif, Leif Gregory wrote (in ): > Are broken threads irritating, yes, but as a moderator and as a fellow > subscriber I would never tell someone they shouldn't post to the lists Your decision, I'd make another. > just because they're unable to use TB due to circumst

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Mary, Mary Bull wrote (in ): > He said in a PM to me yesterday that he was sorry he'd been disrupting > threading. Sorry means for me, that I try that it don't happen again. Anyway - don't solve the problem. > And I apologize to you for messing up your threading in

SOT: Re[2]: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Boris, Thursday, June 30, 2005, 12:26:29 PM, you wrote: > Obvious you would. I can only speak for me; and I'd prefer that he > don't post such mails. But I can't do anything against it and so > I've to accept it :-(. Are broken threads irritating, yes, but as a moderator and as a fellow sub

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Boris! On Thursday, June 30, 2005, 1:26 PM, you wrote: >> Have a look at his X-Mailer! > I don't just care about why they are missing (also I thought something > like this). :) >> We'd rather have him posting than not, wouldn't we? > Obvious you would. I can only speak for me; and I'd p

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Mary, Mary Bull wrote (in ): > Have a look at his X-Mailer! I don't just care about why they are missing (also I thought something like this). > We'd rather have him posting than not, wouldn't we? Obvious you would. I can only speak for me; and I'd prefer that he d

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Boris! On Thursday, June 30, 2005, 1:10 PM, you wrote: >> I don't want to point my finger at Vili ;-) but do you others also get >> his mails not threading? > Yes, very very annoying!!! Reason is that the references are missing - > so if you answer to such a mail, your references are not c

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Martin, Martin Schuster wrote (in ): > I don't want to point my finger at Vili ;-) but do you others also get > his mails not threading? Yes, very very annoying!!! Reason is that the references are missing - so if you answer to such a mail, your references are not c

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello Martin! On Thursday, June 30, 2005, 12:40 PM, you wrote: > I don't want to point my finger at Vili ;-) but do you others also get > his mails not threading? At least sometimes? (Like his "Thank you" > mail in the Bugtraq thread?) Vili is not at home, he told me. He is, regrettably, having

Vili's Mails not threaded

Hello tbbeta, I don't want to point my finger at Vili ;-) but do you others also get his mails not threading? At least sometimes? (Like his "Thank you" mail in the Bugtraq thread?) -- Martin TB! 3.5.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4