Hello TBBETA,
I have tried Voyager today for the first time. Nice to see that I can
use my TB! pro key for it. But it's far less nice to see that I can
activate only 5 USB sticks.
I understand that Ritlabs must avoid piracy, but I'd really like to be
free to change my usb stick more
Hi Fabio,
on Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:42:42 +0200GMT (12.08.2006, 15:42 +0200GMT here),
you, Fabio Muzzi, wrote:
FM I have tried Voyager today for the first time. Nice to see that I can
FM use my TB! pro key for it. But it's far less nice to see that I can
FM activate only 5 USB sticks.
FM
installation.
No, I don't think so. I think the Voyager installation on the stick
(it's OTFE) is related to the stick's serial number.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Travel is very educational. I can now say Kaopectate in seven
different languages.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message
On Saturday, August 12, 2006, 17:01:18, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
No, I don't think so. I think the Voyager installation on the stick
(it's OTFE) is related to the stick's serial number.
If it's the volume serial number, that can be easily changed through
software.
--
Jernej Simončič http
Hello Jernej,
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 17:12:27 +0200 GMT (12/08/2006, 22:12 +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simončič wrote:
No, I don't think so. I think the Voyager installation on the stick
(it's OTFE) is related to the stick's serial number.
JS If it's the volume serial number, that can be easily changed
On Saturday, August 12, 2006, 17:29:38, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
If it is in the software of the stick, what you are suggesting is
either a workaround or a crack, isn't it?
Volume serial number is stored in the boot sector, and it's usually written
when the disk is formatted. Given that USB
8/7/2006 10:01 AM
Hi Vili,
On 8/7/2006 Vili wrote:
V Hello tbbeta,
V First, sorry for the offtopic, but as not too many mails, I thought...
V What kind of (very fast) USB drive would you recommend to use with
V Voyager?
I have been using Voyager for some time and find that the operating
Hello Paul,
V First, sorry for the offtopic, but as not too many mails, I thought...
V What kind of (very fast) USB drive would you recommend to use with
V Voyager?
I have been using Voyager for some time and find that the operating
system affects speed more than the USB device. If you have
lunes, 7 ago 2006 at 15:44, it seems you wrote:
What kind of (very fast) USB drive would you recommend to use with
Voyager?
I have this one
http://www.kingston.com/flash/dt_elite.asp
It's extremely fast compared with others
Read and write speeds of up to 24MB/sec. and 14MB/sec.
It reads
hi Paul,
Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 6:02:51 AM, you wrote:
How sad for you that you lack understanding. Good luck as you move to
greener pasture.
huh. won't anyone move somewhere else when facing lack of
understanding? even the usage of Outlook/Thunderbird/whatever with
this list speaks for it
hi Mary,
Sunday, July 30, 2006, 9:46:43 PM, you wrote:
I understand. The initial reporter is given as vitalie vrabie. I
seem to remember that he's on the development team.
not anymore. long story. to cut it short, it's mindset-related. mine
pretends to be an industrial one in the shift to
its purpose doesn't mesh with yours. Better you would seek a
place who's purpose meshes with you.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.80.04 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.1.2600
No IMAP OTFE Opera 8.5
Current beta is 3.81.12 | 'Using TBBETA
hi Paul,
Monday, July 31, 2006, 5:14:57 PM, you wrote:
It seems that to retain the purpose of TB development in its
original form it is important to listen and understand the
originators of the purpose without trying to reform them.
lol. didn't you know that just dressing pampers won't
7/31/2006 11:00 PM
Hi vitalie,
On 7/31/2006 vitalie vrabie wrote:
vv lol. didn't you know that just dressing pampers won't return you to
vv your happy childhood?
How sad for you that you lack understanding. Good luck as you move to
greener pasture.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.80.04
Hi all,
I tried Voyager the first time after upgrading to XP, and I see, that
it doesn't just enter the registry entry Voyager » Speller, as it used
to on Win2K and Win98, but also the folders AdvSort and FolderEditor.
What should be the use of this?
It is no acceptable behavior to write registry
Hello Peter!
On Sunday, July 30, 2006, 12:56 PM, you wrote:
I tried Voyager the first time after upgrading to XP, and I see, that
it doesn't just enter the registry entry Voyager » Speller, as it used
to on Win2K and Win98, but also the folders AdvSort and FolderEditor.
What should
Hi Mary,
on Sun, 30 Jul 2006 13:11:38 -0500GMT (30.07.2006, 20:11 +0200GMT here),
you, Mary Bull, wrote:
It is no acceptable behavior to write registry entries to friendly
hosts' machines by no means! :(
MB It is indeed not acceptable!
MB I haven't tried Voyager yet, but I might want
Hello Peter!
On Sunday, July 30, 2006, 1:31 PM, you wrote:
MB NB: Peter, the severity of this looks more than minor to me. Maybe it
MB was minor with only the Speller involved, but 3 Registry entries to a
MB machine one has only borrowed looks more nearly in the major category,
MB to me. Perhaps
Hello all,
Sunday, July 30, 2006, Mary Bull wrote:
Maybe one of them happens to hear us... ;)
I do hope so! I've mentioned so far the names of Maxim and Vitalie in
posting to this thread.
Perhaps Stefan, Marek, or 9Val will also be reading, if they have
filters that focus on their names.
Hello Marek!
On Sunday, July 30, 2006, 2:06 PM, you wrote:
Maybe one of them happens to hear us... ;)
I do hope so! I've mentioned so far the names of Maxim and Vitalie in
posting to this thread.
Perhaps Stefan, Marek, or 9Val will also be reading, if they have
filters that focus on their
?
This bug is advancing beyond the annoying stage for me at this point.
Thanks,
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.80.04]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta is 3.81.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com
Hallo Thomas,
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 08:53:46 +0700GMT (1-7-2006, 3:53 , where I live),
you wrote:
TF So, I renamed it into .tbb, but Voyager would not offer me an option
TF to import. It would import .tbb files from v1 and v2, but not v3.
Actually it says 'TB msg base v1 (.msb)' and 'TB msg base
Hello Roelof,
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 11:27:21 +0200 GMT (01/07/2006, 16:27 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
RO The .tbb type of message base has been in use since TB v1.42 and I
RO believe that you were using TB at that time, so you should have
RO remembered that. g,dr
Well, it's confusing to use
Hallo Peter,
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:45:39 +0200GMT (30-6-2006, 23:45 , where I
live), you wrote:
PO does anyone know of a way to recover messages from a part.bin
PO file, reported after an integrity check?
The way to recover from an unencrypted .bin is to rename to
messages.tbb and try an
with an encrypted .bin.
PO No luck.
Open the .bin with a text editor, and you will see that it is unencrypted!
So, I renamed it into .tbb, but Voyager would not offer me an option
to import. It would import .tbb files from v1 and v2, but not v3.
1.) The .bin should be encrypted, shouldn't it?
2
Hello Thomas,
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 02:30:09 +0700 GMT (16/06/2006, 02:30 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF The anti-virus / anti-spy (whatever) at an internet cafe just ate up
TF Voyager 3.80.4 on my USB stick a few days ago. Don't know whether they
TF use SD or something else. I will have
Reply to message sent 06/13/2006, @ 16:02:45 (8:02 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Maxim,
[-] (#0005877) Voyager wants to download normal TB! when checking for updates
Is there a beta version of Voyager available to test?
Thanks,
--
ò.ó Nick
Hello all,
Monday, May 15, 2006, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Do I need to create a BT item?
yes, do it
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 3.80.06
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM,
Hello Marek,
On Mon, 15 May 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do I need to create a BT item?
MM yes, do it
and I'd support it too. Could be dangerous if you're not fully
concentrating on the file you're downloading.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.80.06 with SpamPal POP3
Hello Richard,
On Mon, 15 May 2006 09:41:43 +0200 GMT (15/05/2006, 14:41 +0700 GMT),
Richard Wakeford wrote:
Do I need to create a BT item?
MM yes, do it
RW and I'd support it too. Could be dangerous if you're not fully
RW concentrating on the file you're downloading.
Hello Thomas,
Note added.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.80.06 with SpamPal POP3 account and no Plug-ins
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot
Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html
on for download.
TF When I first encountered that menu item, I tried it and got the
TF information you already have the latest version. So it seems to work
TF fine overall. :-)
One problem: I just installed Voyager 3.80.04 (over 3.65.02 - smooth
as silk) and then hit that menu item. It wanted
Hello TBBETA,
I already posted this problem in another thread, but it was suggested
to me by PM to open a new thread with this problem, so as to ensure it
is not lost.
The finding:
I just installed Voyager 3.80.04 (over 3.65.02 - smooth as silk) and
then hit that menu item. It wanted
I just installed Voyager 3.80.04 and am having Smart Bat act funky.
If I open it up and do anything to one of the pads I can't switch to
another pad, and if I try to exit I get this message:
Data was not saved. Do you wish to abandon changes? Yes/No/Cancel
If I click Yes is closes and if I
Hello all,
Wednesday, May 10, 2006, Nick Danger wrote:
Can anyone confirm (I'm guessing this is Voyager specific, if it's not
just a me problem.)
yes, I have already asked Stef to fix it.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 3.80.03
Hello Martin,
On Mon, 1 May 2006 11:38:19 +0200 GMT (01/05/2006, 16:38 +0700 GMT),
Martin Schoch wrote:
MS TheBat version is 3.80.03
MS Voyager version is 3.72.03
MS Any explanation for this difference?
They may have to get around to it.
I, too, am at the moment downloading the Voyager
version number in the file number (like with the main
program) would be appreciated.
Seconded.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.72.03]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta is 3.80.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http
5/1/2006 10:48 AM
Hi Nick,
On 5/1/2006 Nick Danger wrote:
An additional version number in the file number (like with the main
program) would be appreciated.
ND Seconded.
Me too!
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.72.03 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE Opera 8.5
Hello Paul,
On Mon, 1 May 2006 10:48:40 -0400 GMT (01/05/2006, 21:48 +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
An additional version number in the file number (like with the main
program) would be appreciated.
ND Seconded.
PVN Me too!
I hope the Ritlabs people read here and we don't need to hand in
On Mon, 1 May 2006, at 10:48:40 [GMT -0400] (which was 16:48 where I
live) Paul Van Noord wrote:
An additional version number in the file number (like with the main
program) would be appreciated.
ND Seconded.
Me too!
I just downloaded voyager from the Ritlabs website and installed it on
my
Hi,
I tried to use the current release voyager with MAPI/Exchange server.
Basically it worked ok, but there are two points that make continued use
impossible:
1.) When the account was set for periodic checking there was a password
prompt every time. Of course that's unusable, the password has
Hi,
one more thing with Voyager:
I was unable to use any kind of PGP. The internal PGP reportet
something along the lines of unknown encoding format when trying to
decode a received, PGP encoded message, and no other PGP types were
selectable - not even GnuPG. Also, from my PGP PUBRING.SEC only
Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
On Sunday, April 2, 2006, at 10:00:11 [UTC+0200] (Sunday, April 2, 2006
10:00 my local time) Martin Schoch wrote:
What's about the development of Voyager? Or did I miss something?
See my signature - this version is on RITLabs site.
Okay...Can someone help me
Hallo Keith,
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 01:10:01 -0600GMT (3-4-2006, 9:10 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
KR At one time, I had Voyager working, but I haven't used it for months.
KR This thread prompted me to install the latest version to try it
KR out, and now, of course, it's prompting me
hi,
Monday, April 3, 2006, 10:39:00 AM, you wrote:
The master password is what you've used as encryption key during the
install of Voyager.
not quite.
during install (the msgbase creation, actually) the following happens:
1. the encryption key is *generated*, based on enough collected
Roelof Otten wrote:
The master password is what you've used as encryption key during the
install of Voyager.
Thanks, Roelof (he says, sheepishly). I had my usual blinders on,
I guess.
As I recall, when Voyager was first installed, there was a prompt
that came up that required the entry
On Sunday, April 2, 2006, at 10:00:11 [UTC+0200] (Sunday, April 2, 2006
10:00 my local time) Martin Schoch wrote:
What's about the development of Voyager? Or did I miss something?
See my signature - this version is on RITLabs site.
--
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski
(Using The Bat
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, at 11:42:03 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:42 where I
live) Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
What's about the development of Voyager? Or did I miss something?
See my signature - this version is on RITLabs site.
Thanks, installed fine over my former version.
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
former version.
And works fine too :-)
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! E-Mail System Voyager version 3.72.03 on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http
Hello Tbbeta,
Voyager Beta 3.70.06 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager37006.rar
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.70.06 quot
Hello Maxim,
Voyager Beta 3.70.06 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager37006.rar
Bugs :-(
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5627
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5536
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
--
Best regards,
Alexander Gert
Hello all,
Saturday, January 28, 2006, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Voyager Beta 3.70.06 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager37006.rar
It is not possible to finish fresh installation of this version, after
activating of Voyager, dialog Create new user account
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, at 05:43:47 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:43 where I
live) Marek Mikus wrote:
Hello all,
Saturday, January 28, 2006, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Voyager Beta 3.70.06 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager37006.rar
It is not possible to finish
On 2006-01-25 (15:11), you wrote:
Is there a spam plugin or program that will work with Voyager? As in,
doesn't install any needed components to the hard drive?
Regula
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat
Reply to message sent 01/26/2006, @ 19:05:24 (12:05 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Krzysztof,
Regula
Color me stupid, but I have no idea what that means.
A quick Google doesn't do much to clarify.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[Reply to: Nick Danger · 2006-01-26 · 20:31 h (CET)]
Hello, Nick!
Regula
Color me stupid, but I have no idea what that means.
That's the name of such a plugin:
Website (German): http://www.gaijin.at/tbpregula.php
--
Cheers!
VA - using The Bat! 3.70.03 Qigong(Pro) on Windows XP SP 2.
Hello Nick Danger everyone else,
on 26-Jan-2006 at 20:31 you (Nick Danger) wrote:
Regula
Color me stupid, but I have no idea what that means.
A quick Google doesn't do much to clarify.
Google again. :-) Use regula plugin as a search term and hit the I'm
feeling lucky button.
--
Best
Reply to message sent 01/26/2006, @ 23:28:44 (4:28 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Volker,
That's the name of such a plugin:
Website (German): http://www.gaijin.at/tbpregula.php
Thanks, but as my German is strictly limited to board game terms
Hello TBeta,
Is there a spam plugin or program that will work with Voyager? As in,
doesn't install any needed components to the hard drive?
Thanks,
--
òžó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.65.02]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 12:55:04, you wrote:
what does %WDIR%\ stand for? It is placed as a variable in the Mail
Directory setting.
In the latest Voyager, the %WDIR% is no longer displayed.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, at 01:03:17 [GMT +0200] (which was 0:03 where I
live) Maxim Masiutin wrote:
The Bat! Voyager 3.65.02 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install.exe
Up and running. Installed over the former version without problems :-)
--
Henk M. de
Hello Tbbeta,
The Bat! Voyager 3.65.02 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install.exe
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.65.02
I cannot run Voyager ... first, after submiting password, I get this:
AppName: voyager.exe
AppVer: 3.64.1.0
ModName: kernel32.dll
ModVer: 5.1.2600.2180
Offset: 0001eb33
and on this Windows monit I click 'close' and next I get two next errors -
see screenshots.
This end, Voyager can't
Hello steverio,
Wednesday, January 4, 2006, 5:23:18 PM, you wrote:
S For me, for some reason, TBV does not associate itself with a mailto:
S by setting preferences there in the program. Even so, it does not list
S itself in the registry as a recognized mail client. In order for IE6
TBV isn't
1/5/2006 5:49 AM
Hi vitalie,
On 1/5/2006 vitalie vrabie wrote:
Thank you for confirming that. Leaving no registry traces is the way
to go.
vv so, TBV in no way default mailto handler at all, is that correct?
vv my point was, it comes handy for the period TBV is *already* running.
vv
1/4/2006 6:27 AM
Hi Roelof,
On 1/4/2006 Roelof Otten wrote:
RO TBV isn't supposed to list itself in the registry whatsoever. It
RO should leave the registry alone. Therefore it should not be able to
RO install itself as the default mail client. The only thing that's wrong
RO is that it offers
Hello Roelof...
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:10:55 +0100, you wrote:
Hallo steverio2k,
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:27:01 -0800GMT (4-1-2006, 2:27 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
S For me, for some reason, TBV does not associate itself with a mailto:
S by setting preferences there in the program. Even
Hello,
I have several Gmail accounts and they all work very well with TB!
I am now starting to use Voyager in my USB key.
All my other accounts function properly, at least to download (I
haven't sent any messages yet). However, I couldn't connect to my Gmail
accounts.
I used the same
Hello Christina...
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:32:39 +, you wrote:
Hello,
I have several Gmail accounts and they all work very well with TB!
I am now starting to use Voyager in my USB key.
All my other accounts function properly, at least to download (I
haven't sent any messages yet). However
Hi steverio,
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:13:43 -0800GMT (04-01-2006, 16:13, where I
live), you wrote:
I used to have GMail in TBV and it connected as well as TB, that is,
intermittently. I could not connect during some times such as peak
Internet use. GMail was slower to connect than my ISP POP
Maria...
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:35:23 +, you wrote:
Hi steverio,
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:13:43 -0800GMT (04-01-2006, 16:13, where I
live), you wrote:
I used to have GMail in TBV and it connected as well as TB, that is,
intermittently. I could not connect during some times such as peak
1/4/2006 6:45 PM
Hi Cristina,
On 1/4/2006 Cristina Ramos wrote:
CR I used the same configuration I have in TB!, so I don't see why
CR Voyager wouldn't work.
CR Are there any known issues related to this?
I do not use POP for Gmail so can't say what is happening. I can say
that XP SP2 is much
On 06-01-04 (16:32), you wrote:
I am now starting to use Voyager in my USB key.
All my other accounts function properly, at least to download (I
haven't sent any messages yet). However, I couldn't connect to my Gmail
accounts.
Voyager at Gmail works fine for me - the same as stationary
Hello steverio,
Saturday, December 31, 2005, 1:14:26 AM, you wrote:
Registering TBV for default email client lacks the approriate keys and
values in the registry.
huh, does it need at all the ability to be registered as such? good
question, eh?
however nonsense it may seem at first,
Hello,
Just back from 2 weeks away and I took Voyager with me. It was good to
be able to read all the mail but, unfortunately, I couldn't write any as
I got the following message every time I tried to send to any address.
Maybe it's something terribly simple but I couldn't work out what it
could
Hello Richard,
Just back from 2 weeks away and I took Voyager with me. It was good to
be able to read all the mail but, unfortunately, I couldn't write any as
I got the following message every time I tried to send to any address.
Maybe it's something terribly simple but I couldn't work out
Hello Vili,
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V You should have used your father's internet connection's SMTP
V server...
Ah. I knew it would be something simple like that. Thanks. I'll do that
next time I'm over.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.64.01 Christmas Edition
Hi Vitalie...
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:29:12 +0200, you wrote:
Hello steverio,
Saturday, December 31, 2005, 1:14:26 AM, you wrote:
Registering TBV for default email client lacks the approriate keys and
values in the registry.
Glad to hear from you again...wonderful! :)
huh, does it need at
Hallo steverio2k,
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:27:01 -0800GMT (4-1-2006, 2:27 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
S For me, for some reason, TBV does not associate itself with a mailto:
S by setting preferences there in the program. Even so, it does not list
S itself in the registry as a recognized mail
On 2005-12-30 (01:50), you wrote:
It is now possible to activate Voyager using the Registration Key
block. Previously, only Order Number could have been used for
activation. Now the user can choose from both options.
Your anonced *beta* is the same file, as here:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en
Hello Krzysztof,
Sunday, January 01, 2006, 14:52:27, you wrote:
Secondly: if only Registration Key allows to use Voyager, then how this
software can be evaluated on standard trial? (i.e. without buying it)
The Voyager can't be evaluated.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
On 2006-01-01 (16:25), you wrote:
The Voyager can't be evaluated.
Why you changed your mind? Earlier Voyager could tryied without buying.
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
/'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl
Hi Maxim,
on Fri, 30 Dec 2005, at 02:50:55 [GMT +0200] Maxim wrote:
It is now possible to activate Voyager using the Registration Key
block. Previously, only Order Number could have been used for
activation. Now the user can choose from both options.
If you first choose order number
Bonjour Maxim,
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2005 à 01:50:55, vous écriviez :
MM Hello TBBETA,
MM It is now possible to activate Voyager using the Registration Key
MM block. Previously, only Order Number could have been used for
MM activation. Now the user can choose from both options.
Good ! could
,
Prezes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! Voyager Professional v3.64.01, Windows XP 5.1, Build 2600, Service
Pack 2
---
ING Nationale-Nederlanden Polska OFE zarabia najwiecej dla swoich
Klientow. Dolacz do
Hello all,
Friday, December 30, 2005, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
It is now possible to activate Voyager using the Registration Key
block. Previously, only Order Number could have been used for
activation. Now the user can choose from both options.
tested and works, many thanks.
http
on the website.
Seems to be wrong.
Here it installed over my former version of Voyager without having to
enter anything :-)
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System Voyager version 3.64.02 on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at: http
12/30/2005 9:33 AM
Hi Henk,
On 12/30/2005 Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
HMdB Here it installed over my former version of Voyager without having to
HMdB enter anything :-)
Here too! 8-}}
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.64.02 Voyager on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP Opera 8.51
On 2005-12-30 (15:28), you wrote:
Here it installed over my former version of Voyager without having to
enter anything :-)
Thomas seems to talk about fresh install. And if I udenrstand him
correctly, todays version of Vogayer spoils here something ...
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
Hi Maxim
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install.exe
Got a 404 not found error...
--
Neal Laugman
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition and Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.4 on
Win2000 SP4
Current beta is
Hello all,
Friday, December 30, 2005, Neal Laugman wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install.exe
Got a 404 not found error...
moved as stable to new location:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install.exe
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech
On Friday, December 30, 2005, 12:58:36 PM, Neal Laugman wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install.exe
NL Got a 404 not found error...
I got the same thing. :(
--
Mike
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service
Hi Krzysztof,
on Fri, 30 Dec 2005, at 18:40:13 [GMT +0100] Krzysztof wrote:
On 2005-12-30 (15:28), you wrote:
Here it installed over my former version of Voyager without having to
enter anything :-)
Thomas seems to talk about fresh install.
Correct - sorry, but I forgot to mention
Hello Prezes...
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:42:20 +0100, you wrote:
Hello,
CR Good ! could it also be possible to remove all the un needed options
CR of the preferences/applications section ?
Remove all preferences/application section - there is only one needed
element: to ask about default e-mail
Hi Marek
moved as stable to new location:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install.exe
Got it. Thank you Marek.
--
Neal
Current beta is NONE | 'Using TBBETA' information:
All TBBETA's
moved as stable to new location:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install.exe
Got it. Thank you Marek.
Beginning to run Bayes Filter Plugin with this version.
--
Neal Laugman
Using Voyager v3.64.02 and Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.4 on Windows XP 5 1
Dear Roelof,
-- Donnerstag, 22. Dezember 2005, 02:38:33:
The writing to the registry that this version does, argues for it
still being a beta.
Probably some have their Christmas spoiled and will not Voyage(r) *gg* ;)
--
best regards | Using The Bat! v3.63.14 (Beta)
, now that it is it's a great gift! For someone who
goes between a work computer and four different computers at home -
it's something I've been wishing for.
--
òžó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.64.01]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current
Dear Nick,
-- Donnerstag, 22. Dezember 2005, 18:55:30:
Probably some have their Christmas spoiled and will not Voyage(r)
I have to say, though it was very quirky (at least for me) to get it
up and running, now that it is it's a great gift! For someone who
goes between a work computer
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, at 21:21:16 [GMT +0100] (which was 21:21 where I
live) Eddie Castelli wrote:
I can agree. Me too I wish a well working TB!voy. But we have to work
a bit to get it to a professional standard.
Yep, including the possibility of using GPG/PGP
The bèta of Mobility Email had it
801 - 900 of 1208 matches
Mail list logo
