Hi all,
I don't know if it's me or TB! who doesn't understand my rule
correctly... ;)
I've server-side spam filtering on my IMAP account (Fastmail.fm),
which is quite great.
Sieve on my server modifies the header of spam mails, so I can mark
these filtered mails as read.
I search for "X-Spam: spa
Het is woensdag 4 mei 2005 en 21:14:31 uur :
Hallo tbbeta,
see attachment... it remains that way; doesn't do what it should.
--
groeten,
Cees
Put Orville Bullitt's brain in a pigeon and it'd fly backwards.
I moved my entire message base to a new install on a new computer. I
have a couple imap accounts, both with multiple sets of client side
filters. On one account, filters are working perfectly. On the other,
not at all.
I've tried re-filtering several times and see that indeed the logs say
that the
Hi all,
This is my second batch of between 10 and 15 messages received.
Filters are created to filter these messages and autofiltering is
enabled.
On both occasions it took 4 passes with the manual filtering for all
messages to be filtered. You filter and 3 are behind. You filter
again, one is be
Hello Manuel,
MB> Perhaps anyone could show me the way, I pasted my filter below.
Works finefor me with manually generated message. So problem
can be in:
1. headers of the real message
2. filter execution (i.e. it doesn't executed correctly)
3. filter wasn't tested at all.
Could you
Hello 9Val,
just now (on 04/20/2005 at 13:03) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Could you try to check if it works after manual refiltering or after
> cache removal?
What I found out is really curios. I tried and sent messages to me,
which would match the criteria.
Everything was filtered correct exc
Filtering on IMAP accounts is hit and miss with this release.
Occasionally, I have to re-filter to get messages from the Inbox to
their respective folders. It's not consistent, but usually happens if I
leave TB! idle for a while.
If I am actively reading e-mail and traversing across various accou
Matt Thoene wrote...
>I moved my entire message base to a new install on a new computer. I
>have a couple imap accounts, both with multiple sets of client side
>filters. On one account, filters are working perfectly. On the other,
>not at all.
>
>I've tried re-filtering several times and see that
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, December 22, 2004, 3:27:07 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this?
Yes I have TB lists on MRB and use filters. Sometimes I see counts for
the inbox folder and it takes a couple of times of selecting other
accounts/folders before the message finally ends up in t
o be filtered. You filter and 3 are behind. You filter
> again, one is behind. You filter again, the one remains. Filter again
> and finally, it is moved.
> Anyone else seeing this?
You could use serverside filtering.
I also had problems with The Bat! IMAP filtering!
But then I just set
On Thursday, December 23, 2004 at 3:47:53 AM [GMT -0500], Kian
Andersen wrote:
> You could use serverside filtering.
This is what I do for the bulk of my mail.
> I also had problems with The Bat! IMAP filtering! But then I just
> set it all up on the server on now everything is good!
On Thursday, December 23, 2004 @ 2:58:54 AM [-0700], Allie Martin wrote:
>> You could use serverside filtering.
> This is what I do for the bulk of my mail.
Allie...what interface do you use for server-side filtering? Does
MDaemon Pro have this feature available?
I'm having strange problems wit
Hi Matt Thoene,
On 23/12/2004 12:06 PM, you wrote:
> Allie...what interface do you use for server-side filtering? Does
> MDaemon Pro have this feature available?
It will filter at the time of distribution to local accounts and it will
filter after distribution to accounts. The account level filt
On Thursday, December 23, 2004 @ 9:29:35 AM [-0700], AC Martin wrote:
> Yes. I do prefer some of TB!'s filtering, especially filtering based on
> address book and the execution of sounds upon filtering to particular
> folders and with particular filter matches.
Hmm...so if you filter at the serve
On Friday, December 24, 2004 at 3:25:41 PM [GMT -0500], Matt Thoene
wrote:
> Hmm...so if you filter at the server, it will not trigger TB sounds
> when it hits the corresponding folders locally?
Yeah. But two things:
- the sounds are triggered even when read messages are added, i.e.,
messages
Hello Allie,
AM> On both occasions it took 4 passes with the manual filtering for all
AM> messages to be filtered. You filter and 3 are behind. You filter
AM> again, one is behind. You filter again, the one remains. Filter again
AM> and finally, it is moved.
If it'll happen again, can you chec
Hi 9Val,
On 04/01/2005 10:23 AM, you wrote:
> If it'll happen again, can you check log to see there is problem - in
> filters work with IMAP messages or with message moving (as I remember
> there are some problems, when messages were copied, not moved)
I'll bee sure to check the logs next time
Hi all,
IMAP autofiltering now seems to work quite smoothly, i.e., without the
AV's and cache corruptions as before. I'm quite pleased that it works
but not without a couple cosmetic issues.
When a new Inbox message is filtered, the Inbox count registers the
message. So for a moment the Inbox see
Hi all,
I just received one of the few messages that ends up being filtered
locally by TB! and not the server. Initially I thought the message had
not been filtered since it was sitting right there in the Inbox. I
selected it and 'no message loaded' remained in the preview pane. I
hit reload, and
Allie Martin wrote:
IMAP autofiltering now seems to work quite smoothly, i.e., without
the AV's and cache corruptions as before. I'm quite pleased that it
works but not without a couple cosmetic issues.
Agreed :-)
When a new Inbox message is filtered, the Inbox count registers the
message. So fo
Curtis,
On 22-12-2005 14:52, you [C] wrote in
:
C> Things are therefore still glitchy in this release, even for those
C> like myself having better than an intolerable experience with IMAP.
C> :)
I have also seen this in the last versions.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
3.64.01 Pro MyGa
On 23/12/2005 at 12:23:19 PM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote:
> I have also seen this in the last versions.
It's good at purging. I just purged over 2000 messages each in a couple
folders. Happened quite quickly and without problems.
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition / ht
22 matches
Mail list logo
