Hi Tim,
on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:00:28 -0400GMT, you wrote:
TC> Upgraded to 3.0.2.3 replaced the executable but the program is still
TC> showing the beta 30019 that I was using before the upgrade.
Maybe it might help to run the 3.0.1 MSI installer once, before going
from 3.0.0 to 3.0.2. Just a
Hi Tony,
on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:38:53 +0100GMT, you wrote:
TB> I installed the NOD32 pluggin that someone mentioned on here. I already
TB> use NOD32, it already checks both incoming and out going mail so what
TB> advantage is there to have the pluggin?
I don't think there is any. I don't e
Hi Tony,
on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:12:51 +0100GMT, you wrote:
TB> [AV plugin]
TB> I'll leave it there, it can't hurt can it?
No, except that it uses resources unnecessarily. If that isn't an
issue, I don't see a problem here. :-)
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.0.2.3 Rush on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, bui
Hi Kevin,
gpg: Signature made 10/29/04 21:25:56 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit using DSA key ID
3A8E5CAD
gpg: Good signature from "Kevin Coates (Lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: aka "[jpeg image of size 2208]"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:
Hi Gunivortus,
on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:42:32 +0100GMT, you wrote:
GG> Being with a browser online, I click on an email link and TB is started
with the
GG> default account. however, I want to use another account, so I change in the
GG> message the From: address, choosing one in the list that pops u
Hi all,
I had no problem installing the new version. The restoring from a tbk
file worked very well, as far as I can see. I had yet to uninstall it,
because I hadn't chosen the correct mail directory during the first
install, and I didn't find a way to make TB! use it. The entry in
Preferences --
Hi Charlene,
on Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:35:12 +0100GMT, you wrote:
>> Uninstall and new install went well, but I found that the previous
>> mailpwd directory was neither removed nor emptied during uninstall,
>> although I had "Keep database" unchecked.
CF> Did you first delete the Ritlabs-entry in th
Hi Richard,
on Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:08:16 -0500GMT, you wrote:
RN> Where? Oh, where are quick templates. Here I am writing this in "Edit
RN> Mail Message" and under "Utlities" there is only a greyed-out
RN> "Create a quick template."
Greyed-out here too. Use the shortcut ++Q.
--
Cheers
Peter
Hi Raymund,
on Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:17:35 +0100GMT, you wrote:
RTT> Ich möchte für die Vorstellung am 27.November um 19:30 Karten reservieren.
lol Don't use folder templates that contain the %TO macro.
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.0.2.8 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800M
Hi Chris,
on Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:49:56 +GMT, you wrote:
CW> TB! has just crashed in a way I've never seen before!
CW> ...
CW> Has anyone else witnessed this?
Not in this version. I remember occasions when this indeed happened,
but that was many beta versions ago. And it was on Win98... Sorr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I played around with GnuPG a bit, and set up a free form primary user
ID (just my name, no e-mail, no comment). TB! doesn't seem to like
this. If I have to sign or decrypt anything, TB! shows a window "Enter
passphrase for Unknown Recipient",
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Maxim,
on Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:00:26 +0200GMT, you wrote:
>>> [Christmas Edition]
MM> We've decided to release a stable version with new major
MM> additions at a cost of the nice release date, thus we will most
MM> likely to release the new versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Maxim,
on Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:04:42 +0200GMT, you wrote:
>>> [free form primary UID]
MM> As soon as you've registered this at the bugtracker, you have
MM> nothing to worry about.
Thank you. Done. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
there are two minor issues in my daily use of PGP/GPG with The Bat!,
but still I'd like them fixed:
One: I'd like The Bat! to automatically check PGP signatures, when the
message is selected. I saw this in KMail and Sylpheed, and it is
indeed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Henk,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:46:06 +0100GMT, you wrote:
HdB> I downloaded the new GnuPG version 1.4.0 but after installingand
HdB> trying to send a signed message I got the message:
HdB> gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available.
At lea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Henk,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:07:06 +0100GMT, you wrote:
HdB> Bad sig?
Nope. :-))
gpg: Signature made 12/16/04 21:07:06 Westeuropäische Normalzeit using DSA key
ID DBE6E678
gpg: Good signature from "Henk M. de Bruijn"
gpg: aka ..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alexander,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:49:40 +0100GMT, you wrote:
ASK> Can you please check the two last messages from Henk de Bruijn and Peter
ASK> Meyns?
ASK> Peters PGP-sig-delimiter is "- -- " (with space before CR) and its not
ASK> recognized by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alexander,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:12:21 +0100GMT, you wrote:
ASK>>> Peters PGP-sig-delimiter is "- -- " (with space before CR) and its
ASK>>> not recognized by the RTV as signature, but recognized & stripped
ASK>>> when replying. Henks PGP-sig-del
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:44:41 +0100GMT, you wrote:
>> Two: I'd like to have an option to save decrypted messages. Encryption
>> is fine for transmission, but I don't need them necessarily encrypted
>> on my computer. It was possible up to ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
on Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:19:48 +0100GMT, I wrote:
PM> I played around with GnuPG a bit, and set up a free form primary user
PM> ID (just my name, no e-mail, no comment). TB! doesn't seem to like
PM> this. If I have to sign or decrypt anything,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bill,
on Sat, 18 Dec 2004 13:52:49 -0600GMT, you wrote:
BM> On Sat 18-Dec-04 1:40pm -0600, Bill McCarthy wrote:
>>gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available
>> Hmm, while trying to sign this note, I received the
>> same message :-(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi MAU,
on Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:11:01 +0100GMT, you wrote:
M> No, I haven't died yet, or at least completely ;-)
I hope, not even partially! :-o
M> Just too much travelling and too busy to actively participate on the
M> list. But I read you (more or
Hi Dierk,
on Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:06:52 +0100GMT, you wrote:
DH> Currently I am using Full-width Message List and at first start of
DH> TB get a main window consisting only of the tool bar, menu and
DH> message list - which is wrong and can be healed by choosing another
DH> split mode and
Hi Avi,
on Sun, 26 Dec 2004 08:50:27 +0200GMT, you wrote:
AY> While we are talking about TB and VCF, I have an annoying problem
AY> here. Quite frequently, when I launch TB, I get the following message:
AY> "Files with extension .vcf are not associated with The Bat!". I then
AY> associate the fil
Hi Avi,
on Sun, 26 Dec 2004 15:42:08 +0200GMT, you wrote:
>> Have you check-marked it under Options » Preferences » Applications?
AY> Absolument! That would be just too easy a solution, n'est ce pas, mon
AY> ami? I am sorry to say that the problem is a bit more mysterious than
AY> that.
I'm sor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mary,
on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:32:07 -0600GMT, you wrote:
MB> Hello Peter and Everyone!
MB> Peter, I've just read the support note which you added to my report at
MB> bugtracker, http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4205
MB> I want to thank you s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Boris,
on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:13:49 +0100GMT, you wrote:
BA> Are you planing another BugFixing-Beta cycle after the current cycle?
I'm just a list member with no particularly close relations to RITlabs,
but I dare to say, yes, certainly! Unless /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I use GnuPG and have a free form primary user ID, i.e., just the name,
nothing else. The sub-UIDs contain the email addresses. The Bat! only
accepts the first email address for her implemented GPG use. So, if I
try to sign this message with ++
Hi Alexey,
on Fri, 28 Jan 2005 02:50:03 +0800GMT, you wrote:
ANV> I use dial-up connection and sometimes it stucks.
ANV> When I try exit The Bat! in these cases, I see:
ANV> ---
ANV> Warning
ANV> ---
ANV> Some tasks are now active.
ANV> Do you wan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stuart,
on Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:48:49 +GMT, you wrote:
MP>> I know PowerPro (use it for some things, like software specific buttons),
but
MP>> what are you referring at?
SH> Some time ago, someone (Allie?) published a PowerPro macro that, in
S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Claude,
on Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:27:38 +0100GMT, you wrote:
ASK>> Why is this message arriving again and again? Or is it only me?
CR>Sorry, it is not my fault.
CR> I noticed this too, but I did not send messages since two days.
CR> So, there is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
The Bat! is great in offering access to many functions via the
keyboard. But there seems to be a problem in the Sorting Office. I
cannot invoke the "_A_dd condition" button although the A is
underlined and the button should be "pressed" by the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:25:33 -0500GMT, you wrote:
JR> Hi Simon. Thanks for the info. The plot thickens. The other
JR> bayesit isn't working worth a darn either IMO. Don't know where to
JR> go from here. Back to regular filtering, I guess.
Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Miguel,
on Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:59:41 +0100GMT, you wrote:
>> The Bat! is great in offering access to many functions via the
>> keyboard. But there seems to be a problem in the Sorting Office. I
>> cannot invoke the "_A_dd condition" button althoug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stuart,
on Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:17:32 +GMT, you wrote:
SH> If I open the sorting office and go to an existing filter, the "Add"
SH> button is disabled. I have to RMB click and select "Add" from there.
Clicking the "Add" button works here. Howe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The,
on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:50:18 -0500GMT, you wrote:
TFC> I hope I'm asking to the right list, but I'd like to know
TFC> if some of you are agree with this wishlist
TFC> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:18:20 +0100GMT, I wrote a message that was
signed twice.
I don't know why this occurred. Maybe I should stick to GnuPG, but
the newer versions don't work from within TB!...
- --
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :beta:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:26:38 +GMT, you wrote:
PM>> Maybe I should stick to GnuPG, but the newer versions don't work
PM>> from within TB!...
MDP> -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
MDP> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc2 (MingW32)
MDP> Working fine for
Hi Marck,
on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:56:47 +GMT, you wrote:
PM>> gpg: key 9E19BFC2: secret key without public key - skipped
PM>> gpg: key 9E19BFC2: secret key without public key - skipped
PM>> gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
PM>> gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:16:02 +GMT, you wrote:
PM>> I know this is getting OT and should be followed up on PGP-Basics,
PM>> but while we're at it, how do I set up a default /secret/ key?
PM>> default-key 0x03365206E10774CE
MDP> ...
M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:41:46 +GMT, you wrote:
MDP> Have you checked my sig My key has about 10 addresses in it.
But for signing you only use your primary UID, I suspect. Haven't
checked that now...
- --
Cheers and good night :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roelof,
on Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:09:47 +0100GMT, you wrote:
MB>> After saving this message as draft, the options for signing and
MB>> encrypting are unchecked.
RO> Confirmed
MB>> This seems to be a bug. Was this introduced in pre-beta cycle?
RO>
Hi Cees,
on Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:11:07 +0100GMT, you wrote:
C> maybe I've missed somethign in the bast but how do I attach a sound to
C> messages I receive by a specific person?
I didn't dare to try the actual pre-beta(s), but here the lowest level
of sound settings is folder properties.
Hi Roelof,
on Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:43:42 +0100GMT, you wrote:
RO> Please somebody tell me that I'm not going crazy.
I'd really like to. But how can I be sure? ;:)
RO> I remember that it used to work...
Maybe. But there is this BT entry saying it would be solved again in
3.0.2.11: https://www.ri
Hi Charlene,
on Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:10:51 +0200GMT, you wrote:
CF> a short moment ago I had no unread mail in my incoming folder. Sudden,
CF> the mailticker started up and is showing 3 unread mails from sender
CF> named "-1b" with the subject -not kidding- "30th Dec 1899". When I click
CF> on it,
Hi betalist,
so now I'm a beta tester too.
This is my first try with a beta version and I like most of what I see.
As I don't have filters for _everything_ there are sometimes messages in my
inbox that I want to move to another folder. In 1.53d I did that by right
clicking the msg in the preview
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:23:47 +0100GMT (which was 11:23 +0100GMT where I live),
Krzysztof Kudlacik presented us with these thoughts about "Common Folder problem":
>> Well... it creates a _new_ folder named _Trash_
KK> Andrew - I know what is "normally" meant by "move to trash"/
KK> Ple
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 19:01:52 +0100GMT (which was 19:01 +0100GMT where I
live), Dierk Haasis presented us with these thoughts about "Common folders
- making them better":
>> Dierk, it is easy to select any of your accounts by highlighting the From:
>> line in editor and opening the menu.
DH> I kno
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 12:38:02 -0600GMT (which was 19:38 +0100GMT where I
live), Dwight A Corrin presented us with these thoughts about "Common
Folder problem":
DAC> I got the whole works, before any use of them by me.
DAC> inbox,outbox,trash,sent. Still think common folder sent file is an
DAC> oxym
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:26:53 +0100GMT (which was 17:26 +0100GMT where I
live), Patrick Cornelißen presented us with these thoughts about "The Bat!
- bug report : Attachements not shown":
>> I'm getting some weird characters here on Windows 2000 (US version),
>> instead of the ß in your name
>> I'
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:00:30 +0100GMT (which was 17:00 +0100GMT where I live),
Alain de Gevigney presented us with these thoughts about "1.54 Beta/14 source view bug
report":
AdG> This is what the source view display when trying to view the source
AdG> of a message with a _big_ attach (3 828
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:34:58 +0800GMT (which was 08:34 +0100GMT where I live),
Thomas F presented us with these thoughts about "Slow message finder":
TF> If I do want to search for the attachment name (which is in the "lower
TF> headers" and therefore neither in the Headers nor in the Body), TB
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I only once checked the box "Store the information in the password
database". My passphrase was still cached when I restarted TB!. It is still
cached after rebooting! What's that? I don't want my passphrase to be
stored on this computer for
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:31:54 +0200GMT (which was 17:31 +0100GMT where I live),
Maxim Masiutin thought about "beta/16" and wrote in another thread:
>>> [!] Virus Checker (see the options in the "Options|Virus Checker" dialogue)
>> Just out of interest, what does the [!] mean ?
MM> It's a majo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:52:34 +0100GMT (which was 15:52 +0100GMT where I live),
Dierk Haasis thought about "Collapse threads keyboard shortcut" and wrote:
DH> I hope I am not the only one: Why can't the keyboard shortcut for
DH> Expand all threads
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:24:43 +0100GMT (which was 15:24 +0100GMT where I live),
Dierk Haasis thought about "Still present..." and wrote:
>> No, can't find it anywhere. I have none of the problems with the CC
>> locking up after send and recei
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 11:05:08 -0500GMT (which was 17:05 +0100GMT where I live),
John Seymour thought about "Connection Center (was: Still present...)" and wrote:
TF>> Where is this checkbox? I couldn't find it.
JS> Took a little searching to find this one.
JS> Are your settings for LA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 00:46:32 +0800GMT (which was 17:46 +0100GMT where I live),
Thomas F. thought about "Connection Center (was: Still present...)" and wrote:
PM>> Btw., I was really impressed of your connection centers, as I never knew
PM>> anything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 00:31:48 +0800GMT (which was 17:31 +0100GMT where I live),
Thomas F. thought about "Current bugs" and wrote:
TF> another problem bothers me now: You attached 3 *.png files. I usually
TF> open all of them, rearrange them on my scr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001 19:25:01 -0600GMT (which was 02:25 +0100GMT where I live),
Boris Golberg thought about "Common Folders" and wrote:
PM>> Does anyone have an idea for a workaround? I moved a common folder to an
PM>> account in Windows explorer, jus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TB! developers and beta fellows,
I realized in beta21 that the file size in the preview isn't displayed
correctly if it is a large file. In my case 155.738 bytes were given as
1.557 (see attached screenshot). I'd very much like to see the /real/
f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
I'm in the TB!Beta list for some time, and there is one proposition I'd
like to make for the better use of this list. I see, that any time there
is an announcement of a new beta, everyone replies to this announcement.
Wouldn't it be nicer to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:53:06 -0600GMT (which was 20:53 +0100GMT where I live),
Boris Golberg thought about "msg size not displayed correctly" and wrote:
BG> Do you have letter 155K size? I mean - without attachments. 8-)
?? Oops, I'm sorry, I don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:30:56 +0100GMT (which was 14:30 +0100GMT where I live),
Per Goetterup thought about "The Bat! - bug report" and wrote:
PG> Any idea when 'current week' will change from meaning 'since monday' to 'last
PG> 7 days'? :-)
Hi Per,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I'm not sure if this is a beta issue or OT. I just received two mailer
daemon messages for messages that were actually delivered. Does anyone
have an idea why I received them? I'll quote one of them including
headers:
Return-path: <>
Enve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:40:21 +0200GMT (which was 15:40 +0100GMT where I live),
Pete thought about "printing" and wrote:
Nick>>> Put %CLIPBOARD into your printer template.
Nick>>> Then just highlight what you want printed, Ctrl-C, and print.
Hi all,
somewhere along the way through the betas I must have lost the file
thebat.lng. It is not found on my computer. Can anybody suggest a way to
restore it?
TIA
--
Cheers
Peter
*
This message was created using The Bat!, version 1.54 Beta/28,
under Windows 98, 4, 10, build 67766222,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:54:05 -0500GMT (which was 12.02.02, 17:54 +0100GMT
where I live), Jan Rifkinson wrote this about "template problems in beta_39":
JR> Has anyone experienced a problem using some of your
JR> templates in beta_39? In particular I noticed that
JR> the bracketing template
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:13:06 +GMT (which was 22.02.02, 14:13 +0100GMT
where I live), Tony Boom wrote this about "Glyphs":
TB> Maybe a simple variation of the original with neutral colouring?
Hi Tony,
very good idea! The "valid" notion irritates me too. I'll add your
suggestion to my glyph
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:31:43 -0500GMT (which was 22.03.02, 18:31 +0100GMT
where I live), Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote this about "Bug with Mailticker?":
CGS> Does anyone else have this:
CGS> Whenever a new message arrives and the mailticker is displayed, I have to
CGS> double-click very "hard"
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 21:36:52 +0900GMT (which was 22.03.02, 13:36 +0100GMT
where I live), Yuki Taga wrote this about "Start up and periodic checking bug?":
YT> Seems if I have check on startup selected, and a periodic setting,
YT> there is no check on startup. Instead checking begins 1 period af
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 19:38:44 +0200GMT (which was 22.03.02, 18:38 +0100GMT
where I live), Stefan Tanurkov wrote this about "1.60 has been "silently" released":
ST> Just wanted to say that the release installation is now available at
ST> the official place and the executable is available at
ST>
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 18:08:54 +0900GMT (which was 23.03.02, 10:08 +0100GMT
where I live), Yuki Taga wrote this about "Start up and periodic checking bug?":
PM>> for testing I disabled "No automatical dial for periodical checking".
PM>> Now TB! connects and checks on startup as it should...
YT> Bi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi friends,
the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there are
some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it refuses to
encrypt or decrypt, the error msg telling me that the key was not found
(although it is in my key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:39:12 -0800GMT (which was 25.03.02, 19:39
+0100GMT where I live), Nick Andriash wrote this about "Favourite
addressees no more available":
NA> Cannot confirm using 1.60a on a finely tuned Win98SE System. ;o)
Hi Nick,
now you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:21:41 -0600GMT (which was 25.03.02, 20:21 +0100GMT
where I live), Joseph N. wrote this about "PGP/GnuPG in 1.60":
JN> My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the
JN> GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:04:39 +0100GMT (which was 26.03.02, 09:04 +0100GMT
where I live), Dierk Haasis wrote this about "PGP support broken?":
DH> -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Hi Dierk,
too bad, I don't have Nick's private key, but it makes me curiou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 11:41:40 +0100GMT (which was 30.03.02, 11:41 +0100GMT
where I live), Johannes Posel wrote this about "PGP support broken?":
JP> I do not have the eMail anymore, but I think it was one or two
JP> messages. Might as well be the reci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 09:38:45 -0500GMT (which was 30.03.02, 15:38 +0100GMT
where I live), Allie C Martin wrote this about "PGP support broken?":
PM>> What has happened to GnuPG support in TB!? I can't get it
PM>> working any more.
ACM> What problems
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 10:25:51 +0100GMT (which was 30.03.02, 10:25
+0100GMT where I live), Andreas Schwartmann wrote this about "1.60 has
been "silently" released":
AS> Can you tell me the name of the Plug-In? There seem to be lots of them
AS> at the WinAmp site and I can't find my way through this
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:29:41 +0200GMT I wrote this about "Copying":
PM> On Sun, 31 Mar 2002 03:03:36 -0600GMT (which was 31.03.02, 11:03 +0200GMT
PM> where I live), Dean wrote this about "Copying":
D>> Hello, Just curious, I have notice last several versions that I can't copy
D>> and paste email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Luc,
on Sun, 7 Apr 2002 19:06:36 +0200GMT (which was 07.04.02, 19:06 +0200GMT
where I live), you wrote on TBUDL:
L> When i compose a new message and use the address picker, all my
L> addresses appear.
L> How can i avoid that so that i get the sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:33:44 +0100GMT (which was 10.04.02, 17:33 +0200GMT
where I live), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MDP> "Options | Message list colours..."
MDP> The "Generic group" defines the default font for message lists.
A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Miguel,
on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:42:41 +0200GMT (which was 10.04.02, 18:42 +0200GMT
where I live), you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MAU> A new discovery for me. I thought that you were calling 'message
MAU> headers' what I ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marcus,
on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:46:52 +0200GMT (which was 10.04.02, 19:46 +0200GMT
where I live), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>> All I find there is to select arabic, greek or chinese. The rest is
>> only about colours.
Hi Thomas,
on Tue, 26 Nov 2002 02:16:01 +0700GMT (25.11.02, 20:16 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TF> suppose I receive an email that requests a reading confirmation. I
TF> have TB set so that I will be prompted. The prompt query comes up when
TF> I move fr
Hi Thomas,
on Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:52:24 +0700GMT (26.11.02, 04:52 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TF> Try it with "Yes". I have now done so by marking such a message as
TF> Unread, then reading it and moving the cursor to another account by
TF> clicking wit
Hi Timothy,
on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:23:41 -0500GMT (04.12.02, 17:23 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TC> I have asked for help on many different occasions over the past few
TC> months only to receive 0 responses.
What about, no one knows the answer? I have pu
Hi Thomas,
on Mon, 30 Dec 2002 02:16:54 +0700GMT (29.12.02, 20:16 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>> Most international keyboards use the AlGr+e (or very similar)
>> combination.
TF> I don't have an altGR key. I believe it is similar to left-alt +
TF> shif
Hi Thomas,
on Mon, 30 Dec 2002 02:33:04 +0700GMT (29.12.02, 20:33 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>> Alt Gr is the right alt key here. It is the same as left-alt + ctrl. And it
>> indeed produces a ¤ sign with E. *S*
TF> Not here. Right-alt + e opens the E
Hi Tony,
on Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:37:57 +GMT (04.01.03, 18:37 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB> Can anyone tell me how to send mail with 163b1 without having to save it
TB> as a draft first please.
Strange. I can use the Send button with the mouse o
Hi Allie,
on Mon, 6 Jan 2003 06:47:36 -0500GMT (06.01.03, 12:47 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB>> Batch file
AM> A surprising amount of requests have appeared so I'll publicly post it
AM> since it's short
And it works perfectly. Thank you, Allie :-)
-
Hi David,
on Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:51:01 -0500GMT (06.01.03, 17:51 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DRA> I suppose it will be a good time to upgrade from The Bat 1.53d.
DRA> Please tell me the safest way to install The Bat on the new disk
DRA> without delays.
Hi Jonathan,
on Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:32:00 -0600GMT (22.01.03, 16:32 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
JA> If you create multiple alternative strings in a filter, and go to a
JA> middle item, then use the drop down list for setting where you want
JA> your filt
Hi Jonathan,
on Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:38:24 -0600GMT (22.01.03, 18:38 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>> Not confirmed here. Perhaps it is OS related.
JA> The interesting thing was... it only happened on the second item in
JA> the list. The rest (3rd, 4th, 5
Hi Graham,
on Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:09:39 +GMT (30.01.03, 13:09 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
FG> The supplied templates for TB have the originators mailto: in the
FG> footer of the message.
FG> This is inadvisable...
I agree with you completely
Hi Andy,
on Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:48:11 -0500GMT (23.02.03, 17:48 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>> But why should each user have to tweak the registry? Correct markup
>> would eliminate the problem.
>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A> Nicer still would be if when the link is r
Hi Claude,
on Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:15:04 +0100GMT (24.02.03, 19:15 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
CR> X-Mailer: The greatest mailer you have never seen before version 1.62
CR> Bonjour TBBETA
Bonsoir Claude,
X-Ray seems to work. :-) Or do you use something else?
--
Cheers
Hi Tony,
on Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:39:23 +GMT (28.02.03, 19:39 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB> A reminder of what Peter Meyns typed on:
TB> 28 February 2003 at 19:29:39 GMT +0100
PM>> What's wrong about using the company's network?
TB&g
Hi Tony,
on Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:14:28 +GMT (28.02.03, 20:14 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PM>> Oh, come on. Let's be more tolerant. It is easy to ignore, when you know
PM>> why it appears, isn't it?
TB> OK fine, lets all start advertising.
Why should anyone want tha
401 - 500 of 563 matches
Mail list logo
