Hello all!
I tried many times to set and check additional parameters in filters, but
without success. How to use them according to common sense? How to reference
to the parameter which was set in another filter? Is it possible?
Did anybody successfully use this feature?
--
Best regards
Zygmunt Wereszczynski @ 2005-Jun-12 4:40:18 PM
How and what to do with User parameters in filters? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried many times to set and check additional parameters in filters, but
without success. How to use them according to common sense? How to reference
to the parameter
of e-mail daily and I don't want to wade
through all of the e-mail to find the ones that are ignored.
I've read the help files, but there's not much guidance there. Is
this behavior some kind of bug, or is this by design?
I've also noticed that the results from the Selective Download filters
Januk [J],
On 10-11-2003 05:27, you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
J That's because the address regexps can't handle the colon after the
J labels in the second example. There are a couple of other errors
J too. Try the following (note: I haven't tested this much, so it may
J need polishing):
I
Hello Peter,
On Tuesday, November 11, 2003 at 22:22 GMT +0100, authorities charged
Peter Fjelsten [PF] for writing:
PF I works better now.
I'm glad you're working better, but what about the regexps?! ;-)
(Sorry, I tried to resist, really...)
PF I'm in greater trouble concerning the
Hello Peter,
On Thursday, November 6, 2003 at 23:26 GMT +0100, something compelled
Peter Fjelsten [PF] to inscribe:
PF It's the strangest thing: for some orders, it works 85% on for others
PF only 10% - although there are more that works 10% than 85%.
That's because the address regexps can't
Januk [J],
On 05-11-2003 05:17, you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF Something is halting the output as only the fixed text is output,
PF i.e. the NAVN=, etc.
J This is when you try it in TB? Which type of template are you using?
I have tried putting your template into the sorting office,
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:08:01 +0100 (05.11.2003 03:08 my local time)
you wrote about Text parsing: RegEx, filters, maybe third party software?
at least in part:
PF So it's hard for me to test here. If I remove (?im-s) it will compile
PF some places.
Regexp tester in TRegExp
Januk [J],
Sorry for replying late but I've just stated a new job this Monday (usability
engineer), so it's a bit hectic for me... :)
On 03-11-2003 01:45, you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
J Ok, I've got most of it, though perhaps not the hardest parts. This
J is partially tested, but you'll
Hello Peter,
On Thursday, October 30, 2003 at 15:33 GMT +0100, clairvoyants were
mystified when Peter Fjelsten [PF] conjured:
PF Please bear with me, as this may be a log message and a bit difficult
PF to understand.
Ok, I've got most of it, though perhaps not the hardest parts. This
is
Hi all
I asked for the specifications of .TBB/.TBI and filter files, and I
was told to wait until v2, as the filters where going to change a lot.
Well, they haven't as they are the same as v1.63.
Now, is it possible to have this information available?
* TBB/TBI (messages and folder index
Hello James,
Thursday, July 17, 2003, 8:38:48 AM, you wrote:
JS Is it possible to assign a unique name to a file that is
JS extracted or exported via a filter? Specifically I'd really like
JS to use a macro expansion like $DATE$ in the file name...or
JS better yet use regular expressions to use
Hello tbtech,
Is it possible to assign a unique name to a file that is
extracted or exported via a filter? Specifically I'd really like
to use a macro expansion like $DATE$ in the file name...or
better yet use regular expressions to use the original message's
subject line (and /or other header
On Wed 2-Jul-03 10:37am -0400, Carsten Thönges wrote:
No. I think it is wrong. The Reply-To address does not necessarily
belong to the sender.
Wrong may a bit strong. The message to which I'm replying has you in
the From: line - you wrote it. It has tbtech in the Reply-To: line.
Tbtech was
Where TB! stores his filters? Is it in some file, or registry or some
other place?
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
/'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl |
/'.'; `-,`--',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Polish Support
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote:
Where TB! stores his filters? Is it in some file, or registry or some
other place?
ACCOUNT.SRX file in account's diurectory on disk.
--
Marek Mikus
Czech Support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
the rest of the filters handle
things differently.
Possible uses:
1 Keeping an external kill file with subjects or from addresses to
delete mails. That way I could have a manual filter to add such data
to a database of sorts to remove threads I have no interest it.
2 The opposite
Hello Kjartan,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:08:41 +0200 (22.10.02 16:08 my local time)
you wrote about Filters: running external programs
at least in part:
KM The filename passed to an external program by a filter is this the same
KM message TB will use after the program finishes executing
Hello Kjartan,
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 at 13:33 GMT +0200, electricians were
shocked that Kjartan Mannes [KM] potentially scribbled:
No... My dirty workaround is Save to text-file using template, modify
file (Unix-mailbox), import back, kill original
KM Drats. Oh well, I can always do it
Anyone have any really aggressive spam filters set up in the
bat?
I need some pointers or examples.
also
How do you set a string in the filters if there is no TO:
address in the email. What do you put in the string field.
I tried leaving it blank and it filtered everything.
thanks,
Timbo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On or about Wednesday, April 10, 2002 at 09:27:03 (GMT -0400),
Timothy Casten ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Anyone have any really aggressive spam filters set up in the
bat?
Yes.
I think there's an item in the FAQ about
Thursday, 17 January, 2002, 5:50:14 AM, you wrote:
R I recall a thread with the same request some time back and Jan (if Irecollect
R right) had suggested that one could use the 'message is older than' option in
R the advanced options of the filter. Maybe some experimentation and you
Thursday, 17 January, 2002, 9:24:26 AM, you wrote:
BK It seems there is a problem with your question: Which object should
BK expire?
BK The answers assume that *a message* should expire. Your reference to
BK Forte Agent suggests that *a filter* should expire.
I was reffering the to filter.
this possible?
A non techie answer in this tech group...
This would involve two filters (one is the filter you want to expire) and use of
windows scheduler.
The filter you want to expire will have an additional condition which is that a
specific address is present in an address book.
The second filter
Hello Daniel,
Mitteilung vom Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2002, 18:36:09:
D Thanks for advices, but it seems to me to not to worthy work for such
D simple action. I was thinking more about some selection on the filter
D options that maybe i was unable to find, like In Forte agent expire
D filter in n
Tuesday, 15 January, 2002, 12:50:09 AM, you wrote:
AA Hello.
AA Here's one way to do it:
AA Have the filter export the message to a file and launch a VBS script.
AA Checking dates in VBS is trivial.
AA The message can be sent back to TB!, if necessary, via the /MAIL
AA parameter.
Thanks
Daniel,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, at 18:36:09 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:06 PM where I live) you
wrote:
D Thanks for advices, but it seems to me to not to worthy work for such
D simple action. I was thinking more about some selection on the filter
D options that maybe i was unable to find, like In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
On 14 January 2002 at 19:54:54 +0100 (which was 18:54 where I live)
Daniel wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
Is there a way for filter in TB to expire after given period. (i.e.
to delete itself or at least make no
Hello.
I've written a VBS script that generates a summary of the messages
treated by my TB! Incoming mail filters. My filters direct one or more
messages to various folders. I wanted one message to summarize what
each folder received.
I hope the script is self-explanatory. Most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Januk Aggarwal !
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 02:43:14 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 11.12.2001, 11:43 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
GE ([01]?\d\d?|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])\. [snipped:]
That'll work.
GE Still 0.0.0.0 is possible, but
Hello Januk Aggarwal !
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:27:40 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 11.12.2001, 20:27 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
GE What I meant was, that this regex matches an invalid/impossible
GE IP-Number. I hope you understood me that way.
Actually, I thought you meant it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:52:44 +0300, Stefan contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
...
ST I've seen your post in TBUDL, but you were talking about a single
ST filter. What I meant is collecting several filters in an editor with
ST further copying
32 matches
Mail list logo
