Hi Syafril,
I just noticed your note written Saturday, August 3, 2002, stating:
SH> ... you already know that myrealbox.com will go to maintenance
SH> mode for 2-days or more, why not change your subcription to
SH> digest or set on vacation (the procedure to do that already
SH> mention on Welc
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 15:51:00 +0200 Peter Palmreuther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SH> Hmm...I have idea, how if we change the procedure to automatically
> SH> going to vacation for 14-days instead of unsubscribe.
>
> That's exactly what I wanted to suggest after reading this thread.
> I don't kno
Hello Syafril,
On Saturday, August 3, 2002 at 3:14:40 PM you [SH] wrote (at least in
part):
SH> Hmm...I have idea, how if we change the procedure to automatically
SH> going to vacation for 14-days instead of unsubscribe.
That's exactly what I wanted to suggest after reading this thread.
I don't
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 20:07:02 +0700 Syafril Hermansyah
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ...]
> > A "20 bounce limit, and 3-days reset" would not have lasted the
> > weekend, except for those subscribing to the TBUDL-Digest (if there
> > is one). Obviously, when a server is down, the number of bounces
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 14:07:11 -0500 Douglas Hinds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I dunno. Let's look at it. None of us were unsubscribed from TBTech,
> which suffered the same condition except the message flow is much
> less. This indicates that a higher message flow (i.e. TBUDL)
> requires a higher
Hello Syafril,
With reference to the bounce rate / automatic subscription cancellation
policy you've got in place:
Apparently ALL of us who were subscribed with myrealbox.com
addresses were booted from TBUDL, with no notice given - and that
ain't good. What to do? ("Is it me or
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 11:50:14 -0500 Allie C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> GL> It seems like it would be better to use a criteria like "bounces
> GL> on three separate days" without a reset, rather than on a strict
> GL> 15 bounce count. If a mail service was down for a couple of hours
> GL> b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Gary Lucas [GL] wrote:
GL> It seems like it would be better to use a criteria like "bounces
GL> on three separate days" without a reset, rather than on a strict
GL> 15 bounce count. If a mail ser
On Friday, August 02, 2002, Syafril Hermansyah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SH> In the past bounce message from myrealbox.com not recognize well by
SH> Listar bounce watcher, now it work perfectly as it should.
SH> If listar bounce watcher receive more than 15 bounce from specific
SH> address, she
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday, August 03, 2002
12:31:03 PM
RE: "Is it me or "
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greetings Syafril,
On Friday, August 2, 2002, 11:56:51 AM, you wrote:
Syafril> Correct.
Syafril> In the past bounce message
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 07:34:27 -0500 Gary Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect it must have something to do with the message from Syafril
> Hermansyah
>
> SH> We have change the bounce watcher on this list, to be more
> SH> accurate.
Correct.
In the past bounce message from myrealbox.com n
On Saturday, August 03, 2002, DG Raftery Sr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DRS> For the past 4 days I have received nothing but a trickle of messages
DRS> generated on any of The_Bat!'s lists. I have received only 1 or 2 a day and
DRS> those are mostly from the tbtech list. Is there a problem with t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday, August 03, 2002
7:56:30 AM
RE: "Is it me or "
Greetings,
For the past 4 days I have received nothing but a trickle of messages
generated on any of The_Bat!'s lists. I have received only 1 or 2 a day and
those are
13 matches
Mail list logo
