Hello Jast,
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 at 06:12:09 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
J> Thanks, but...
J> I imported the PGP-key and added the forms. Now this may sound
J> stupid, but I still have no idea how to use them. I see them in the
J> submission forms menu window, but all I can do with them is delete
J
Hello Douglas,
> I did start this as private mail, but it's a valid question for
> TBUDL: Why do you all use The Bat?
It's simply the best.
Nico
__
<---<--{@ http://inferiamoris.dreamhost.com/nico @}-->--->
___
On 26 January 2000, Nico Schirwing wrote:-
> Hello Douglas,
>> I did start this as private mail, but it's a valid question for
>> TBUDL: Why do you all use The Bat?
> It's simply the best.
I agree with that. I finished with Eudora Pro 4.x as they refused to
acknowledge genuine bugs and fix th
Hello Martyn & all fellow TBUDL members,
Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 5:42:46 AM, Martyn responded to Nico's
saying:
>> It's simply the best.
Which did not respond to Tom's question. Martyn however, gave concrete
reasons why he prefers it in relation to other mailers. I did also. I
feel that t
> On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 1:54:34 PM, Nick Andriash wrote:
>> I have "auto correct" enabled
> A clarification on the above statement... I have "Automatic Checking"
> enabled, as "Auto Correct" doesn't work for me, and never has.
Good point.
I can't find anything in the help file that stat
> On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 2:09:00 PM, Fred Weissman wrote:
>> "Ignore All" as I understand it, tells the checker to ignore all occurrences
>> of that word for -this- message (or use) only. Since it's not being added
>> to the user dictionary, it will flag it as unknown/incorrect the next
>
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 7:15:11 AM, Fred Weissman wrote:
> Methinks the right-click version of 'ignore all' isn't connected to
> anything. IOW, it doesn't work. And I hope the guys at RIT are reading
> this.
I sent off a letter yesterday to RIT Research Labs about the problem...
for me
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 7:19:26 AM, Fred Weissman wrote:
> I can't find anything in the help file that states exactly what 'auto
> correct' is -supposed- to do.
> Because now that you mention it, I'm not so sure it's doing anything right
> now.
Fred, it's supposed to automatically correc
In Reference to "Spell Checker Oddity ?" From Nick Andriash:
NA> Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such
NA> as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_
NA> the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should
NA> a
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:38:10 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
==8<
> Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such
> as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_
> the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should
>
> In Reference to "Spell Checker Oddity ?" From Nick Andriash:
NA>> Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such
NA>> as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_
NA>> the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should
>> I did start this as private mail, but it's a valid question for
>> TBUDL: Why do you all use The Bat?
NS> It's simply the best.
I'm coming to learn this... ;)
Next thing I wanna know is, how are they going to pull off column
block selection mode if they allow proportional width fonts? It's
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
Recently, the box that had been opening up in the middle of my
screen as I downloaded messages, giving me a very helpful message
count, has stopped displaying. I see only an icon on the task bar.
I'm sure it's some obvious (to everyone else 8-)) setting that
a
Hello Douglas,
>> It's simply the best.
> Which did not respond to Tom's question.
It does. The Bat unites all the features that other programs lack off
under a smart interface. I always thought that would be impossible,
since often you get cool features here and a nice interface there...
but no
Hi Sebastian,
SA> I am using The BAT since version 1.38e. I installed PGP support (6.5)
SA> and am happy with it. There is just something that keeps bothering me,
SA> and it happens every time I decrypt an encrypted message (it contains
SA> the sender's public key at the end). The program keeps a
Hi,
...
J> I imported the PGP-key and added the forms. Now this may sound stupid, but
J> I still have no idea how to use them. I see them in the submission forms
J> menu window, but all I can do with them is delete them from there again...
J> Am I doing something wrong?
from a mail to this
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 10:13:28 AM, Allie Martin wrote:
> I see under the spellchecker menu, an option for automatic checking. Where's
> this autochecking option? I don't see it anywhere. :-/
Well the option is invoked if you simply choose the option off the Spell
Checker Menu, and beco
On Tuesday, January 26, 1999, 8:54:45 AM, Nick Danger wrote:
> It's there, just quirky. If you type Febuary you'll notice a more
> squared off underline than the usual zigzag type for misspelling. For
> those words a double right click will "auto correct". I think there
> is also a keyboard sho
Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 10:51:34 AM, Nico wrote:
> It does. The Bat unites all the features that other programs lack off
> under a smart interface. I always thought that would be impossible,
> since often you get cool features here and a nice interface there...
> but not all together. Well, u
Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 10:35:47 AM, Wolfgang wrote:
> The solution is not to put your PGP key in every message.
> That's an absolutely annoying overhead. Put it on your
> home page and add the URL to your signature.
Feh. "Finger for PGP key." :P
--
Steve C. Lamb |
In Reference to "Spell Checker Oddity ?" From Nick Andriash:
>> It's there, just quirky. If you type Febuary you'll notice a more
>> squared off underline than the usual zigzag type for misspelling. For
>> those words a double right click will "auto correct".
NA> Thanks Nick... always saw the b
KR> Recently, the box that had been opening up in the middle of my
KR> screen as I downloaded messages, giving me a very helpful message
KR> count, has stopped displaying. I see only an icon on the task bar.
Click the icon on the task bar, it'll pop the window open if it's been
minimized.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:05:15 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
==8<
>> I see under the spellchecker menu, an option for automatic checking. Where's
>> this autochecking option? I don't see it anywhere. :-/
> Well the option is invoked if you simply choose the option off the Spell
> Checker Men
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:28:57 -0600, Nick Danger wrote:
==8<
> "- Intelligent suggestions for misspelled words - SSCE can locate
> suggested replacements using either typographical (looks like) or
> phonetic (sounds like) matching. Suggestions are scored by the degree
> of closeness with
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:51:04 -0700, Keith Russell wrote:
==8<
> Recently, the box that had been opening up in the middle of my screen as
> I downloaded messages, giving me a very helpful message count, has
> stopped displaying. I see only an icon on the task bar.
> I'm sure it's
NA>> Thanks Nick... always saw the bolded line, but didn't realize that double
NA>> right clicking would do the trick... such a "feature" isn't documented
NA>> anywhere. :o)
> It's there under Spell Checking:
> "- Intelligent suggestions for misspelled words - SSCE can locate
> suggested replace
Hello All,
Does anyone know how to make The Bat! check to see if it is the
default e-mail program? It would always ask me, but one time I told
it not to ask anymore thinking it would automatically make itself
the default e-mail program. Is there a registry edit or ini file
somewhere to
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 11:28:57 AM, Nick Danger wrote:
> It's there under Spell Checking:
quoted snipped
>...but kind of hidden in gobs of text!
Well, I'll be darned!! I must have read that section a dozen times, and it
STILL didn't register with me!! ;o)
Thanks Nick...
Nick
-
I've been trialing Bat on Win98 for a couple weeks now. Last night I
decided to rearrange some folders in main account. They had between 5
and 100 messages in each. Upon moving them I noticed the strange fact
that they no longer had any messages in them - that is, all messages
had mysteriously
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Wednesday, 26 January, 2000, 12:55:10 PM, Allie wrote:
AM> Try going to Account|Properties|Options and uncheck the option "Sticky
AM> send/fetch windows' positions".
Thanks, Allie. As usual, you came through! Looks like I'll have to do
without that option
T
Hi there!
On 26 Jan 00, at 19:51, Nico Schirwing wrote
about "Why do I use The Bat?...":
> >> It's simply the best.
> > Which did not respond to Tom's question.
>
> It does. The Bat unites all the features that other programs lack off
> under a smart interface. I always thought that would b
Hi Group!,
Has anyone tried this; every time I do I get a crash in TB!
If I select more than one e-mail to be forwarded, by highlighting
several individual e-mail (using the Ctrl key), then I get "the
forward / redirect message screen", and select the "address all
addresses to the address bel
AVK> Nope, I do not. Have you been subscribed to PM-WIN? Just for example:
AVK> here, on this list, only few of us have *ever* read RFCs (well, Steve, Marck,
AVK> myself, have I forgotten anybody?).
I've read and argued news-related RFCs, if that counts... ;)
-tom!
--
Hopin' this said *some
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 13:15:04 ,rellieb-jean scribbled:
rj> Upon moving them I noticed the strange fact
rj> that they no longer had any messages in them - [snip] Of course I checked the
rj> 'View' (All Messages) and had a look in Windows Explorer at the
rj> relevant folders, and even
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 13:46:46 ,Gary scribbled:
G> Has anyone tried this; every time I do I get a crash in TB!
G> If I select more than one e-mail to be forwarded, by highlighting
G> several individual e-mail (using the Ctrl key), [snip]
The "bug" for "Redirect" was found, 1/14/00
Hi Angel,
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 3:55:21 PM, you wrote:
G>> Has anyone tried this; every time I do I get a crash in TB!
G>> If I select more than one e-mail to be forwarded, by highlighting
G>> several individual e-mail (using the Ctrl key), [snip]
A> The "bug" for "Redirect" was fo
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 14:06:55 ,Gary scribbled:
G>>> If I select more than one e-mail to be forwarded, by highlighting
G>>> several individual e-mail (using the Ctrl key), [snip]
A>> The "bug" for "Redirect" was found, 1/14/00
A>> Markus sent in a Bug Report on 1/18/00
G> Sorry, di
Hi there!
On 27 Jan 00, at 7:15, rellieb-jean wrote
about "Deathwish: rearranging folders dele":
It's a well-known and _longstanding_ bug (all of you are warned now!): it
happens when you drag full trays rather then individual folders. That is, to
drag folder w/o subfolders is all right, b
Hi there!
On 26 Jan 00, at 13:53, Tom Plunket wrote
about "Re: Why do I use The Bat? (was: "On":
> AVK> Nope, I do not. Have you been subscribed to PM-WIN? Just for example:
> AVK> here, on this list, only few of us have *ever* read RFCs (well, Steve, Marck,
> AVK> myself, have I forgotten
Hello Steve,
> Except for a decent IMAP implementation...
I didn't try IMAP yet. What's wrong with it?
> ...and seamless PGP integration...
How much more seamless do you want it? The Bat has the best PGP
integration I ever used so far...
> ...and external editor support...
Look, I come from
Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 7:13:38 PM, Nico wrote:
>> ...and seamless PGP integration...
NS> How much more seamless do you want it? The Bat has the best PGP
NS> integration I ever used so far...
Support for all of the PGP options. Eudora used to support these
(Eudora Lite still does, AFAI
Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 4:13:38 PM, Nico wrote:
>> Except for a decent IMAP implementation...
> I didn't try IMAP yet. What's wrong with it?
TB! treats IMAP as a glorified POP3 server. IMAP is administration of
remote folders as if they are local. Completely different design.
>> ...a
Hi there!
On 27 Jan 00, at 1:13, Nico Schirwing wrote
about "Re: Why do I use The Bat?":
> > Except for a decent IMAP implementation...
>
> I didn't try IMAP yet. What's wrong with it?
The only thing: there hardly exists any;-(
> > ...and seamless PGP integration...
>
> How much more sea
Hello, Folks,
I might be working with two different operating systems soon (WinNT and Linux).
Does anyone know a Linux-mailclient which is able to read the mail format of TB?
This way I could at least read my mail when working with Linux and would not
have the hassle of two completely differ
Hello Fred,
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 13:33:14 GMT -0500 (which was 10:33 AM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> I've noticed that 'different' underline and never realized why.
> Thanks.
> And yes, a double-right-click does auto correct it.
It is a neat little feature isn't i
Hello Albert M. Afonso,
On Thursday, January 27, 2000 at 15:34:36 GMT -0500 (which was
27/01/2000 3:34 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
AMA> Does anyone know how to make The Bat! check to see if it is the
AMA> default e-mail program? It would always ask me, but one tim
Hello Tom Plunket,
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:53:18 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 27, 2000, 4:53:18 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tom Plunket wrote:
AVK>> Nope, I do not. Have you been subscribed to PM-WIN? Just for example:
AVK>> here, on this list, only few of us have *ever
Hello Angel,
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 13:55:21 GMT -0800 (which was 1:55 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 13:46:46 ,Gary scribbled:
G>> Has anyone tried this; every time I do I get a crash in TB!
G>> If I select more than one e-mail
Hello Michael Frotscher,
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 03:30:17 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 27, 2000, 9:30:17 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Michael Frotscher wrote:
> Hello, Folks,
> I might be working with two different operating systems soon (WinNT and Linux).
> Does anyone k
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 19:32:43 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
==8<
> Can't recreate this either. When I tried to forward a bunch of
> messages I just got a message with a lot of mime attached messages.
> Looks like they slipped in a nice new feature without much fanfare.
> :)
That's
Hello Allie,
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 22:45:22 GMT -0500 (which was 7:45 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> That's been implemented for quite some time now. :)
Can you tell that I don't do much forwarding? :)
--
Thanks for writing
Januk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 6:35:50 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
>> But that's not exactly -auto- in my mind. Auto should mean no user
>> intervention.
> Not necessarily. I think it is far better this way, since I may have
> a valid reason for typing a misspelled word in a given message. I
>
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 19:32:43 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 27, 2000, 10:32:43 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello Angel,
> Can't recreate this either. When I tried to forward a bunch of
> messages I just got a message wi
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 19:49:29 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
==8<
>> That's been implemented for quite some time now. :)
> Can you tell that I don't do much forwarding? :)
I remember many versions ago complaining that I could MIME forward a
MIME attached message. This would preven
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Thursday, January 27, 2000 at 19:32:43 GMT -0800 (which was
27/01/2000 10:32 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
G>>> Has anyone tried this; every time I do I get a crash in TB!
G>>> If I select more than one e-mail to be forwarded, by highlighti
Hello Nick,
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 19:49:47 GMT -0800 (which was 7:49 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 6:35:50 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
>>> But that's not exactly -auto- in my mind. Auto should mean no user
>>> intervention.
>> Not
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
Has anyone found a straightforward way to merge filters from two
different PCs (e.g., home and work)?
TIA.
--
Keith Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.39 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 on a Pentium II 233 with 64 MB.
--
Hello Syafril,
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 11:15:25 GMT +0700 (which was 8:15 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> I just making test to redirect and forward 11 messages, no problem.
I think TB is exploiting a weakness of certain mail servers. If you
notice, when you redire
Hello ,
I have two programs that need new versions of mfc42.dll and
comctl.dll. But I can't remove them in _any_ known way I tried
_everything_: deleting, renaming or cutting them didn't work. Even
from DOS [Norton Commander] - NOTHING HAPPENED!!! Can someone PLEASE
tell
Hi Keith,
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:18:58 -0700GMT (27/01/2000, 05:18 +0800GMT),
Keith Russell wrote:
KR> Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
KR> On Wednesday, 26 January, 2000, 12:55:10 PM, Allie wrote:
AM>> Try going to Account|Properties|Options and uncheck the option "Sticky
AM>> send/fetch windo
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Thursday, January 27, 2000 at 21:49:42 GMT -0800 (which was
27/01/2000 12:49 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
>> I just making test to redirect and forward 11 messages, no problem.
JA> I think TB is exploiting a weakness of certain mail servers
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, January 27, 2000, Michael Frotscher wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
TB and Linux?:
MF> I might be working with two different operating systems soon (WinNT and Linux).
MF> Does anyone know a Linux-mailclient which is able to read the mail format of TB?
62 matches
Mail list logo
