Hi Dierk,
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 08:25:24 +0200GMT (03/08/2001, 14:25 +0800GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH> He once wrote - maybe off-list - of problems sending or receiving mail
DH> with TB!. So he has to use Eudora.
He should tell us about the problems, so we can solve them for him.
DH> I've nothin
Hello Thomas,
On Thursday, August 02, 2001 at 8:38:02 AM you wrote (at least in part):
TF> I have only an Incoming filter for TBUDL, no Outgoing filter. Messages
TF> I send stay in the Sent folder, and if they don't come in through the
TF> list (so they appear in the TBUDL folder by virtue of th
At 09:56 AM 8/2/01 +0100, you wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hi Raj,
>
>On 02 August 2001 at 09:25:58 +0530 (which was 04:55 where I live)
>Raj wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
>
>R> Fellow TB users (Special attn : Moderators),
>
>R> Just wa
Hello Peter,
On Thursday, August 02, 2001 20:08:23 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Possible Filter ?':
Peter> Just my way of sorting, a suggestion to Raj (if he likes it) and something for
Peter> the mailing list archive to search for by a newbie :-)
Peter> Nothing really im
Hi Raj,
On Sunday, July 29, 2001, Raj wrote:
R> I have been following this discussion on Anti Virus program for some time, just a
little
R> surprised (and curious) as to how there is no comment/views on Mcafee's
ActiveShield. I
R> myself have been using it for over a year w/o any problems
Hello Jan,
On Thursday, August 02, 2001 at 7:43:21 PM you wrote (at least in part):
JR> Couldn't this be easily be accomplished by clicking on TBUDL
JR> in the 'To' column of the sent folder? Less computing...
Of course it can :-)
But somehow I like the idea of having them sorted away. :-)
I
Hello Nick,
On Thursday, August 02, 2001 at 7:03:40 AM you wrote (at least in part):
NA> I'm not 100% sure what you mean, but you can always leave the "Source
NA> Folder" and "Move messages to Folder" boxes the same.
[...]
NA> I must admit, I'm a little confused. What exactly are you wanting to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On August 2, 2001, at 12:25:04 AM -0700, Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> Aside from CKT actually being illegal versions of PGP,
> As long as CKT does not make a new version based upon proprietary NAI
> code from 7.x, this statement is just plain wrong, sorry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Raj,
On 02 August 2001 at 09:25:58 +0530 (which was 04:55 where I live)
Raj wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
R> Fellow TB users (Special attn : Moderators),
R> Just wanted to check if there is a delay in the updation of
R>
Thomas,
It is a pocketPC by Compaq - different O/S etc. with no visible
options to Outlook that I can see.
--
Cheers,
Ken
==
Thursday, August 02, 2001, 5:36:51 AM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Ken,
TF> On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 11:59:36
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Wednesday, August 01, 2001 at 10:05:58 PM you wrote:
> Aside from CKT actually being illegal versions of PGP,
As long as CKT does not make a new version based upon proprietary NAI
code from 7.x, this statement is just plain wrong, so
11 matches
Mail list logo
