too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

Hello, After I used TB! a couple of days, I find that there are very large number of tmp files under %temp% directory, all of them are 0 byte of size. Is there any configuration that makes TB! delete these empty temporary files? Thanks. -- Best regards, Bobi Jam pgp0.pgp Description:

Re: too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

Hello tbudl, oops, sorry for misused this reference to create a new topic, I'll create a brand new topic. On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 16:15:38[GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which was 16:15 where I live) tbudl wrote: Bobi Hello, Bobi After I used TB! a couple of days, I find that there are Bobi

Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

Hello, After I used TB! a couple of days, I find that there are very large number of tmp files under %temp% directory, all of them are 0 byte of size. Is there any configuration that makes TB! delete these empty temporary files? Thanks. -- Best regards, Bobi Jam pgp0.pgp Description:

Re: bring mole recipe

Hi Vasiliy, On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 1:11:03 PM PST, you wrote: Hmm... And what are you means? I don't understand. We're still waiting for the mole recipe. :-) -- Melissa PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys pgp0.pgp Description: PGP

Re: Mark unread - and some scheduler stuff too

Hello Gerard, Friday, October 31, 2003, 12:18:30 AM, you wrote: G Try this. Copy the msg to the folder you want the msg to be in with a G filter. When using the copy msg in a filter on regular msg's, the msg G is automagicly made unread. D'oh! I thought I had tried that but obviously I hadn't

Unpleasant encoding

Unpleasant encoding Hi, Here is an Melissa Reese's message. I can read it into the Bat. But if I Make F9(Select all) + Ctrl+C(Copy) and (Ctrl + V)paste into Word The message is encoded? Why? What can I do? Original message into The Bat Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:42:39

Re[3]: 8-bit characters

Hello net5zero, On 31 October 2003, at 00:23 -0500 you wrote: nnn If I get a message is Japanese, can I view it in TB 1.62? If so, what nnn do I need to do? Sorry, about Japanese I don't know. -- Best regards, Vasiliymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using: * The Bat!

Re: bring mole recipe

Some time around 10/30/2003 20:56:22, I think I heard Paul Cartwright say: On Thursday, October 30, 2003, 7:21 PM, you wrote: DJ M2 is Opera's new Mail client. Opera is a browser. I used Eudora DJ before TB but at work I cannot use TB, and its either M2, Mozilla Mail DJ or (eek!) Outlook

Re: Unpleasant encoding

Jean Site, [JS] wrote: JS Here is an Melissa Reese's message. I can read it into the Bat. But JS if I Make JS F9(Select all) + Ctrl+C(Copy) and (Ctrl + V)paste into Word JS The message is encoded? JS Why? What can I do? Nothing really. The messages are encoded like that when they're PGP/MIME

Re[2]: Unpleasant encoding

Hello Allie, Friday, October 31, 2003, 11:42:06 AM, you wrote: AM Jean Site, [JS] wrote: JS Here is an Melissa Reese's message. I can read it into the Bat. But JS if I Make JS F9(Select all) + Ctrl+C(Copy) and (Ctrl + V)paste into Word JS The message is encoded? JS Why? What can I do? AM

Re[2]: TB! 2

Hello Thomas other TB! list members following this thread, On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, Thomas wrote to say: DH What kind of plugins? TF Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus. DH These are plugins designed specifically for TB!? TF Yes. By TB users. I see. By TB users using TB! for email w/ w/o

Re: Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

Hello Bobi, On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:23:39 +0800 GMT (31/10/2003, 15:23 +0700 GMT), Bobi Jam wrote: After I used TB! a couple of days, I find that there are very large number of tmp files under %temp% directory, all of them are 0 byte of size. I confirm I have many of those as well. Is there

Re: TB! 2

Hello Douglas, On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 07:33:35 -0600 GMT (31/10/2003, 20:33 +0700 GMT), Douglas Hinds wrote: [Plugins] TF So far, all of them are free. However, the download sites seem to be TF all over the place, they are not centralised at Ritlabs, because they TF are all still in beta status

Re: Is there a way to filter messages with Base64 coding?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello S Perhaps this would work? S StringsLocationPresence S *** S Content-transfer-encoding: base64Kludges Yes S

Re: Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

Hello Thomas, Friday, October 31, 2003, 8:28:20 AM, you wrote: TF I would like to know why they are there in the first place. TB TF downloads the messages into the temp folder folder, and then imports TF them and deletes the tmp files. If there is a problem, the mails will TF not be deleted from

Re: bring mole recipe

Hello DZ-Jay, Why does everyone in this list feel compelled to beat to death a wrong post, OT post, or other newbie mistakes? Can't you just let it go and concentrate on other *real* TB-ish topics? Not _everyone_ :-)) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat!

Re: Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

Hello Robert, On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:06:04 -0600 GMT (31/10/2003, 22:06 +0700 GMT), Robert C Wittig wrote: I have nothing like this in any of my TB directories, but I did notice a lot of *.tmp files with names like: ffe96db1_{8DC1A9E4-0A15-11D8-8737-00E0295A61BA}.tmp ...in c:\windows I

Re: Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

Hello Thomas, I confirm I have many of those as well. Both you and Bobi are using Beta versions. You are using 2.01.7 and Bobi v2.01.15. Couldn't this be a beta issue to be dealt with in TBBeta? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF:

Re: Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

Hello Jonathan, On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:40:41 -0600 GMT (31/10/2003, 22:40 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: But why are there so many, and why do they have zero size? It's puzzling. It is correct that they are created by TB on download, as a temp file to store information. Are you running

Re: Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

It is correct that they are created by TB on download, as a temp file to store information. Are you running a virus scanner? If so, you might be finding it's causing locking on the file before TB has the ability to delete the file. Lots of those temp files here as well. Even without a virus

Re[2]: TB! 2

Hello Thomas other TB! list members following this thread, On Friday, October 31, 2003, Thomas wrote: TF [Plugins] TF So far, all of them are free. However, the download sites seem to be TF all over the place, they are not centralised at Ritlabs, because they TF are all still in beta status

Re: bring mole recipe

Hi DZ-Jay, On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 2:45:24 AM PST, you wrote: Can't you just let it go and concentrate on other *real* TB-ish topics? Not until we get that mole recipe! :-) -- Melissa PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys pgp0.pgp

Re: bring mole recipe

Melissa- Friday, October 31, 2003, 1:05:38 AM, you wrote: MR We're still waiting for the mole recipe. :-) No moles around here. Would you settle for gopher? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: bring mole recipe

DZ-Jay- Friday, October 31, 2003, 2:45:24 AM, you wrote: Powered by The Bat! v1.62r Hindered by MS Windows 2000 build 5.0.2195 Service Pack 3 ...and I love the tag line... -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Help with new mail template

Friday, October 31, 2003 6:28:42 AM Hi, Im attempting to do a auto-responder which contains my PGP public key. I have a problem and maybe you someone knows the answer. Im want to add (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20key )to my email signature. When I place this in signature template

Re: Help with new mail template

Hi Darrin, On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 6:30:38 AM PST, you wrote: (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20key For some reason it isn't recognizing (%20send%20key) this part of it. Here's the reason: Since TB! recognizes its own macros by the % symbol at the beginning of the macro,

Filter question

Hello, Is there any reason why TB! would not automatically filter a message (when Manual only is not ticked in the filter rule) but will do so when asked to Re-filter Messages (Folderright click)? I find my incoming filters failing me more and more lately... just not working in many cases. Could

Re[2]: bring mole recipe

Hello Melissa, Friday, October 31, 2003, 11:28:26 AM, you wrote: MR Hi DZ-Jay, MR On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 2:45:24 AM PST, you wrote: Can't you just let it go and concentrate on other *real* TB-ish topics? MR Not until we get that mole recipe! :-) I even bought the chocolate. --

Re: bring mole recipe-THE END

On Friday, October 31, 2003, 11:28 AM, you wrote: Can't you just let it go and concentrate on other *real* TB-ish topics? MR Not until we get that mole recipe! :-) ok, so I went to allrecipes.com and found this, so we can END this thread:) Super Chicken Mole A straightforward version of

Re: bring mole recipe

On Friday, October 31, 2003, 5:45 AM, you wrote: have you tried the mozilla client? just asking, as I know nothing about it ;) DJ Yes, I've heard of it, I've actually used it. But at the moment I DJ find it convenient to use M2 at the office (seems faster). But this DJ can change. I am

Re: TB! 2

Hi Douglas, On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 5:33:35 AM PST, you wrote: Upgrades rarely cost the same as an original purchase. Which can be a good thing. Unfortunately, in the case of my favorite Office software (StarOffice), the upgrade from v6 to v7 is basically a full price bug fix! :-( --

Re: Filter question

Hi P, @31-Oct-2003, 12:24 -0600 (18:24 UK time) P.Johnson said: Is there any reason why TB! would not automatically filter a message (when Manual only is not ticked in the filter rule) but will do so when asked to Re-filter Messages (Folderright click)? Sometimes rules used to get corrupted.

Re: TB! 2

Hi Melissa, on Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:00:17 -0800GMT (31.10.03, 20:00 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MR On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 5:33:35 AM PST, you wrote: Upgrades rarely cost the same as an original purchase. MR Which can be a good thing. Unfortunately, in the case

Having doubles due to sorting filters

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I've the following problem: I have a filter in my sorting office for read mail and one for answered mail They both look the same: BeginFilter Name: Dinges (Known) Active: 1 Source: \\Account\$KNOWN$ Target: \\Account\Personen\Map voor

Re: TB! 2

Hi Peter, On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 12:28:28 PM PST, you wrote: I'm sure you know about OpenOffice, which is the open source edition derived from Sun's StarOffice. Couldn't that be an option for you? I have OpenOffice as well, but I like the added features of StarOffice (v7 has the

Re: TB! 2

Hello Melissa Thank you for your email dated Friday, October 31, 2003, 8:42:18 PM, in which you wrote: MR I like the added features of StarOffice (v7 has the ability to MR create PDF documents as well) So has the latest OO - .swf as well. -- Regards William http://www.residues.info and

Re: TB! 2

On Friday, October 31, 2003, 21:42:18, Melissa Reese wrote: I have OpenOffice as well, but I like the added features of StarOffice (v7 has the ability to create PDF documents as well). Doesn't OpenOffice.org 1.1 add PDF saving as well? -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE:TB! 2

Hello Melissa, Friday, October 31, 2003, 9:42:18 PM, you wrote: On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 12:28:28 PM PST, you wrote: I'm sure you know about OpenOffice, which is the open source edition derived from Sun's StarOffice. Couldn't that be an option for you? I have OpenOffice as well,

Re: TB! 2

Hello Melissa, Which can be a good thing. Unfortunately, in the case of my favorite Office software (StarOffice), the upgrade from v6 to v7 is basically a full price bug fix! :-( Wasn't StarOffice free some time ago (a few years)? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)

Re: TB! 2

Hello Melissa, I have OpenOffice as well, but I like the added features of StarOffice (v7 has the ability to create PDF documents as well). http://download.services.openoffice.org/ooo/dev_docs/features/1.1/index.html ,- [ ] | OpenOffice.org 1.1 introduces the one-click PDF export feature

Re: TB! 2

Douglas- Friday, October 31, 2003, 8:12:46 AM, you wrote: DH Sign up and try it out - if your like. LookOut even works with it. DH mail15.com is Russian and has a link for configuring TB! to work DH with it, but the link itself doesn't work the last time I looked. I use my mail15 account with

Re: TB! 2

Hi MAU, On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 1:10:20 PM PST, you wrote: Wasn't StarOffice free some time ago (a few years)? It was if you downloaded it (I have a cable connection, so downloading the rather large SO v5.2 was quick and easy). That policy was discontinued with SO v6 (post beta

Re[2]: TB! 2

Hello Melissa other TB! list members following this thread, On Friday, October 31, 2003, you replied to my claim that: Upgrades rarely cost the same as an original purchase. IBM's Speech Recognition software is another opprobrious exception, and they won't even provide a discount when

Re: TB! 2

Hi MAU, on Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:10:20 +0100GMT (31.10.03, 22:10 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : M Wasn't StarOffice free some time ago (a few years)? Yes, it was. My problem with it was its insisting on an own desktop, which ceased with OpenOffice, which I use happily since

Re[2]: Changing focus by clicking

click to re-sort (or scroll) in another pane and, having done that, one would assume that other pane is now where I intend to focus, but the focus doesn't switch. GM Regarding the scroll bar, that behavior seems normal (and for me, GM desirable). Try it with two paned a Windows Explorer

Re: TB! 2

Hi Douglas, On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 1:36:14 PM PST, you wrote: I see you're using La Chauve-Souris! (v2.01.3) as your mailer. Does that mean you're using Linux? Hee hee...no. It's The Bat! in French. :-) -- Melissa PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: Filter question

Marck, Is there any reason why TB! would not automatically filter a message (when Manual only is not ticked in the filter rule) but will do so when asked to Re-filter Messages (Folderright click)? M Sometimes rules used to get corrupted. I would often have to M re-create a rule from scratch

Re: TB! 2

Hello Peter, ducking because of anticipated trouts Naaahhh, they are being reasonable lately ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:

La Chauve-Souris

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Melissa, Friday, October 31, 2003, 10:17:39 PM GMT, you wrote: M Hee hee...no. It's The Bat! in French. :-) 31 October 2003 23:13:17: Quel joli sourire vous avez! - -- Regards Nigel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP

Re: Filter question

Hello P.Johnson, On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:26:33 -0600 GMT (01/11/2003, 05:26 +0700 GMT), P.Johnson wrote: What I meant to say is that many of my messages come through one of the accounts (Account A) and are filtered through to folders in other accounts. Fine. These messages coming through

Re: bring mole recipe

Hello Paul, On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:40:41 -0500 GMT (01/11/2003, 01:40 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: but eventually, if you continue on TBUDL, you will get the dreaded DEAD HORSE message from the list managers... and something about a trout... Horses, trouts, bats, and now moles: It's a

Re: TB! 2

Hi Mau, @31-Oct-2003, 23:52 +0100 (22:52 UK time) MAU [M] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Peter: ducking because of anticipated trouts M Naaahhh, they are being reasonable lately ;-) ... which doesn't mean that they're *not* watching [bruahahahaha] ;-) -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone --

Re: Filter question

Hi P, @31-Oct-2003, 16:26 -0600 (22:26 UK time) P.Johnson said to Marck: M Sometimes rules used to get corrupted. I would often have to M re-create a rule from scratch to get it to work again. I didn't realize this happened. Too bad this is the case, but it's important to know. I haven't had

TBUDL Mission Statement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is your monthly message from the moderation team to remind you of the primary purpose of this discussion list. To review the list rules, follow the link at the end of this message. Before posting a question to the list, please check The Bat!

Re: TBUDL Mission Statement

Hello Marck D Pearlstone, on Saturday, 2003-11-01, at 02:15:01, in the message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote (at least in part): MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP This is your monthly message from the moderation team to remind you MDP of the primary

Re: bring mole recipe

On Friday, October 31, 2003, 7:17 PM, you wrote: but eventually, if you continue on TBUDL, you will get the dreaded DEAD HORSE message from the list managers... and something about a trout... TF Horses, trouts, bats, and now moles: It's a zoo here. I don't know about a zoo, but it sure

Re: Filter question

Marck D Pearlstone wrote: You don't need this degree of separation with TB. Keep them all together and segregate by folder and use an account reply template that sets reply-to and from addresses according to the original recipient of the message: %REPLYTO=''%REPLYTO='P. Johnson %OTOADDR'%-

Re: Filter question

Hi George, @31-Oct-2003, 18:35 -0800 (01-Nov 02:35 UK time) George Mitchell said: You don't need this degree of separation with TB. Keep them all together and segregate by folder and use an account reply template that sets reply-to and from addresses according to the original recipient of

Re: Question about account template execution

Hi George, @24-Oct-2003, 19:14 -0700 (01-Nov 02:14 UK time) George Mitchell said to TBUDL: ... snip %SETPATTREGEXP=(?i)[EMAIL PROTECTED]%- %_TO_ADDR=%REGEXPMATCH='%OTOLIST, %OCCLIST'%- %IF:%_TO_ADDR:%FROM=''%FROM='%_TO_ADDR':%- ... snip The quote matching looks a bit dubious to me here.

Re[2]: Help with new mail template

Hi, On Friday at 9:31 AM you wrote: MR it must look like this instead: %%20 Thanks Melissa for your help :) -- Darrin pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:

Re: Filter question

Marck D Pearlstone wrote: I posted a question about my attempt at a workable template for this a week ago, but got no replies. :-( It's probably too advanced for the UDL forum. I will have another look at it and see if I can offer any helpful hints. Much appreciated. I was going to try

Re: Connection Centre

Hello N.S.V, On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 03:33:35 + GMT (01/11/2003, 10:33 +0700 GMT), N.S.V wrote: Interesting. You don't have a real name, but PGP-sign your messages to a public list to make sure we know it's from you... whoever you may be. 1. How can I keep Connection Centre window showing after