Re: Problem With Creating Filters

2004-04-16 Thread Steve Mulhall
Hi Gerard > If nobody has seen this problem and you find the same problem on 2 > different machines with 2 different releases of TB! me guess is it is > something you do. Problem is I do not know what. No, no. You misunderstand me. The problem is happening on two different machines with the same

Version 2.1?

2004-04-16 Thread Jarle H. Knudsen
Hello all, a few days ago I received an e-mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] stating that on April 15 version 2.1 of The Bat! would be released. However, checking the Ritlabs website today, the latest version seems to be 2.04.7. Was the e-mail a hoax? Best regards, Jarle H. Knudsen __

Re: Version 2.1?

2004-04-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Friday, April 16, 2004, Jarle H. Knudsen wrote: > a few days ago I received an e-mail from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] stating that on April 15 version 2.1 > of The Bat! would be released. However, checking the Ritlabs website > today, the latest version seems to be 2.04.7. Was the e-mail a hoa

Re: Problem With Creating Filters

2004-04-16 Thread Gerard
ON Friday, April 16, 2004, 9:02:11 AM, you wrote: SM> Having said all that, it appears that I'm the only person using this SM> version who's having this problem The good news is version 2.1 is almost here. I hope that solves your problem. One thought, could this be the result of a malformed head

Re: Problem With Creating Filters

2004-04-16 Thread Steve Mulhall
Hi Gerard > The good news is version 2.1 is almost here. > I hope that solves your problem. Good stuff. There's nothing like a newer version to help eliminate certain problems > One thought, could this be the result of a malformed header in the e-mail? > Have you tried e-mails from different sou

Re: Problem With Creating Filters

2004-04-16 Thread Allie Martin
Steve Mulhall, [SM] wrote: SM> The right-hand click context menu on a message, specifically RH SM> click | Specials | Create Filter, doesn't actually do anything, on SM> any message in any account. I have just upgraded to this latest SM> build and it worked perfectly in the previous build I had SM

Re: 20,000 messages lost at sea

2004-04-16 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Bo, @16-Apr-2004, 09:26 -0400 (16-Apr 14:26 UK time) Dirigo [BD] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: >> If the folders are missing press Shift-Alt-Ctrl-L to let TB hunt >> for missing folders. BD> For the heck of it, I tried the Shift-Alt-Ctrl-L and BD> lo-and-behold TB found a lost one

Re[2]: Version 2.1?

2004-04-16 Thread Miles Johnson
MM> no, but release date was delayed, as You can see in my signature, we MM> have Release Candidate version of 2.1. One would think Ritlabs would have sent a correction with the new date. It's as basic as it gets in term of professionalism and after all, it should just be child's play, one or a f

Bug in 2.10

2004-04-16 Thread John Phillips
Hi Bat! Fans, When starting up I get the following error message:- "Can't create folder c:\ProgramFiles\THEBAT!\Bayesit. Check that no file with such name exists or that access to the folder is allowed." I deleted the folder - re-installed, same message. I un ticked "Read Only" as the folder a

Ritlabs Official Forum has gone...?

2004-04-16 Thread Anne
Just browsing the Ritlabs site whilst waiting for RC1 to download, and I can't find any mention of the Ritlabs forums. If I use the direct page link I had bookmarked, it comes up as a blank page. Has the forum been pulled does anyone know? -- Cheers, Anne Registered Linux user #345132

Re: Version 2.1?

2004-04-16 Thread David van Zuijlekom
Hello Jarle, On Friday, April 16, 2004 at 10:25:13 +0200, you wrote: ... > Was the e-mail a hoax? It's released. Look at my sig. -- Best regards, David ** In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. - Napoleon Bonaparte ** [TB! 2.10] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4] [Runn

Vitual Folders

2004-04-16 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi All I have just downloaded v2.1 and I see that it now has support for virtual folders - Great! erm... forgive me if I seem ignorant, but what are virtual folders, and how can I use them to enrich my life? The web site and help file are strangely quiet on the subject. -- Many Thanks Adam C

Re:Vitual Folders

2004-04-16 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 17 April 2004 at 02:01 rich gregory said: > Does anyone know if the failure of the TRASH to clean itself of old > messages has been fixed? Seems to work OK, but thenI hadn't noticed a problem with the previous version. I found one trash folder in one of my accounts that hadn't been set to

Ver 2.10 Unread Tab

2004-04-16 Thread Munango-Keewati
Hello tbudl, Could someone explain to me the purpose of the Unread tab if all messages--read, unread, parked, etc--are still displayed in the right panel when that tab is selected? One would expect to see only unread messages displayed for each folder in the Unread tab panel. I must be missing s

Re: Vitual Folders

2004-04-16 Thread Geoff Lane
On 17 April 2004, 06:11, rich gregory wrote: > The trash will not delete messages older than X days for me even > though I seem to have everything set right. :( ~~~ I couldn't see which version you're using but in TB 1.62, I need to purge the folder before the expired mail goes. (either sele