IMAP: sync options

When syncing IMAP folders, what is the difference between Headers and text and Full syncronization? -- Best regards, ken mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re: IMAP: Getting all messages

On Friday, January 07, 2005 at 12:01:25 AM [GMT -0500], Ken Green wrote: I would think that switching a folder's sync properties from Headers only to Full Messages would do this, but apparently it's not working. That's the only way I know to do it. So if it's broken for you :( --

Re: IMAP: sync options

On Friday, January 07, 2005 at 12:12:53 AM [GMT -0500], Ken Green wrote: When syncing IMAP folders, what is the difference between Headers and text and Full syncronization? Headers and Text, is retrieval of headers and text without attachments, a more bandwidth friendly option. Full sync

Re: IMAP: sync options

On Friday, 7 January 2005, Allie Martin wrote: AM Headers and Text, is retrieval of headers and text without AM attachments, a more bandwidth friendly option. AM Full sync retrieves everything, i.e., headers, text and attachments. But does that actually work in practice? In my experience, I

Re[2]: How do you get decent support out of

Hello Thomas, Thursday, January 6, 2005, 6:07:54 PM, you wrote: TF I mean that I am not aware of any software company selling an email TF product that offers tech support better than the TB lists. I have in the past, for major corporations, contracted support from Microsoft (for

Re[2]: How do you get decent support out of

Hello Mary, Thursday, January 6, 2005, 6:07:25 PM, you wrote: MB I think perhaps Thomas may have thought he was Replying to Andrew. MB Andrew said that his company selected a different e-mail client, right Ah, my mistake. Thanks for clarifying. Still not used to The Bat threading over decent

Re: How do you get decent support out of

Hello Stuart Moore everyone else, on 07-Jan-2005 at 16:56 you (Stuart Moore) wrote: I think that you need to define better. I think we may be driven by very different criteria. H. Do you know - how much have you, or your company, paid for the MS or IBM support? ...thats a very different

Re: How do you get decent support out of

Hello Stuart, On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:56:08 + GMT (07/01/2005, 22:56 +0700 GMT), Stuart Moore wrote: TF I mean that I am not aware of any software company selling an email TF product that offers tech support better than the TB lists. SM I have in the past, for major corporations, contracted

Re: How do you get decent support out of

Hello Stuart Moore everyone else, on 06-Jan-2005 at 17:01 you (Stuart Moore) wrote: I am not sure that I understand your points exactly. I feared so. :-) ASK Those that actually do are either very, I beg your pardon, stupid, or ASK rather big, so that they have their own IT administration

Re: How do you get decent support out of

Hello Stuart! On Friday, January 07, 2005, 9:58 AM, you wrote: MB I think perhaps Thomas may have thought he was Replying to Andrew. MB Andrew said that his company selected a different e-mail client, right Ah, my mistake. Thanks for clarifying. Still not used to The Bat threading over

FR: UI: extend quicksearch

Hello TBUDL, The user interface of the Bat should really get improved: If you Alt-Tab to TB (and in general) you should be quickly able to access a certain message. That is not possible ATM: You come there, the focus might be in the folderlist or messagelist, or the preview window (but unlikely).

Re: IMAP: sync options

On Friday, January 07, 2005 at 6:44:16 AM [GMT -0500], Tim wrote: But does that actually work in practice? In my experience, I cannot retrieve text separately to attachments. When I use it, it seems to work here. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Ambition is the last refuge of the failure.