Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread John Phillips
Hi Bat! Fans, Just wondering if Bat! can handle high speed ADSL correctly. My standard connect is 1.5 mb. I have noticed at times that all messages are downloaded (info from the connection centre) and the message deletion from the server may be 10 or 15 messages behind. However eventually the

Re: Storing sent mails automatically in the correct folder...

2005-02-26 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello WilWilWil everyone else, on 26-Feb-2005 at 00:21 you (WilWilWil) wrote: It would be perfect. If I send a mail to friend named A from his folder I've set, I do not need to move the sent mail to his folder. TB do it for me. TB does this for me. With a Virtual Folder. :-) You only need

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello John Phillips everyone else, on 26-Feb-2005 at 09:01 you (John Phillips) wrote: I have noticed at times that all messages are downloaded (info from the connection centre) and the message deletion from the server may be 10 or 15 messages behind. However eventually the deletion catches

Re: Again, why only TB built-in filters are enough to fight all sorts of SPAM

2005-02-26 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 26 Feb 2005, @ @ at 00:38:01 +, when MFPA wrote: I remember somebody who said only email me with this exact subject line, or your messages will be junked by my spam

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Alexander, A reminder of what Alexander S. Kunz on TBUDL typed on: 26 February 2005 at 09:17:09 GMT +0100 ASK So I'd say - coincidence. Me too. I have my Bat running on the same PC as my mail server. The whole process of collecting and sending is all but instantaneous with no

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
John Phillips writes: Just wondering if Bat! can handle high speed ADSL correctly. My standard connect is 1.5 mb. I connect to my own e-mail server on my LAN at speeds of 100 Mbps with no trouble. I have noticed at times that all messages are downloaded (info from the connection centre) and

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Eric
On Sat, 26 Feb. 2005 19:01:54 +1100 GMT(26/02/2005, 08:01 + GMT), John Phillips wrote: 6JP Just wondering if Bat! can handle high speed ADSL JP correctly. My standard connect is 1.5 mb. I thought I had a similar problem, but have concluded that it was Norton AntiVirus unable to deal with

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tony, On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:00:16 + GMT (26/02/2005, 18:00 +0700 GMT), Tony Boom wrote: TB Me too. I have my Bat running on the same PC as my mail server. The whole TB process of collecting and sending is all but instantaneous with no TB corruptions. In the office I also download

Re: Storing sent mails automatically in the correct folder...

2005-02-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mary, On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:46:07 -0600 GMT (26/02/2005, 06:46 +0700 GMT), Mary Bull wrote: MB In your Account/Sorting Office-Filters/file drop-down-menu, choose MB Create a new Filter, while the focus is on Outgoing. Name the filter MB (for example) A. Put Recipient (get recipient from

TB! truncating messages encrypted with PGP

2005-02-26 Thread DZ-Jay
Hello: I am using TB! v2.12.00 and just recently decided to use my current installation of PGP Freeware v7.0.3 to encrypt/decrypt messages. I used to do this before when I used Eudora Pro, but never in TB!. TB! encrypts messages perfectly fine, and I am able to decrypt the messages

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Jernej Simoncic
On Saturday, February 26, 2005, 9:01:54, John Phillips wrote: Just wondering, as the subject line says, can Bat! correctly handle ultra high speed connections? Or just a coincidence? TB has no problems with fast connections. I'm used to downloading mail with over 200kB/s (or a few MB/s when

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Thomas Fernandez writes: In the office I also download mails from the LAN at 100MBps. No corruption, even though the filtering (and status importing messages is a couple of seconds slow. No problem. How many filters do you have? I have lots of filters and sometimes the filtering is so slow

Re: Storing sent mails automatically in the correct folder...

2005-02-26 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Thomas! On Saturday, February 26, 2005, 9:08 AM, you wrote: You are right about this, but there is a features request out there wishing for an option to store sent messages in the folder that is active when message is created or something like that. This would improve usability. I

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Anthony, On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:11:03 +0100 GMT (26/02/2005, 23:11 +0700 GMT), Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: AGA How many filters do you have? Over a hundred. AGA I have lots of filters and sometimes the filtering is so slow that it's AGA time to go out and check mail again before it

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Thomas Fernandez writes: Over a hundred. I don't have that many, but TB still falls behind on the filters (as far as I can tell). 30 seconds is very often. What do you need that for? It's not often at all on a 100 Mbps network. It costs nothing and I get my e-mail in nearly real time that

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Thomas, A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez on TBUDL typed on: 26 February 2005 at 16:06:34 GMT +0100 TF even though the filtering (and status importing messages TF is a couple of seconds slow. No problem I noticed that, the connection centre flashes up for a split second then I can

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread John Phillips
Hi Thomas, On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, at 22:03:25 [GMT+0700] (which was Sun, 2:03:25 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: In the office I also download mails from the LAN at 100MBps. No corruption, even though the filtering (and status importing messages is a couple of seconds slow. No problem.

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread John Phillips
Hi Anthony, On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, at 17:11:03 [GMT+0100] (which was Sun, 3:11:03 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: (I have TB set to check mail every 30 seconds on my LAN). Do you have trouble with 3.01.33 losing mail on your lan? On our lan at work I had to revert back to 2.12 as version

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
John Phillips writes: Do you have trouble with 3.01.33 losing mail on your lan? Offhand, I can't remember ever losing any e-mail ... even when TB has crashed. When I start it back up, the messages are all there. However, it faults with enormous frequency now (dozens of times a day,

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Anthony, On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:32:30 +0100 GMT (27/02/2005, 02:32 +0700 GMT), Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: 30 seconds is very often. What do you need that for? AGA It's not often at all on a 100 Mbps network. It costs nothing and I get AGA my e-mail in nearly real time that way. Try

Re: Can ADSL be too fast for Bat!

2005-02-26 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Thomas Fernandez writes: Try checking every 2 minutes and see whether the problem persists. OK. Can you this AV here? the numbers won't tell me anything, but they might tell somebody something. I'll try to take a screen shot the next time I see it. -- Anthony

Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-26 Thread Mark Wieder
B- Thursday, February 24, 2005, 2:04:28 PM, you wrote: David I find it a little odd that Eset/NOD32 isn't on that list. They're David usually pretty fast. Where did you find that info anyway? I'm curious. BRiaNS http://www.hispasec.com/unaaldia/2308/ BRiaNS I hope you know spanish ;) Well,