Re: Help with S/MIME on Microsoft Crypto API

Hello Henk, On Tuesday, July 26, 2005 at 12:21:10 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote: As I intended to finally use it I changed S/MIME configuration to use Microsoft Crypto API. Sadly I wasn't able to sign any e-mail, most probably because I choose the wrong settings. All I get (after selecting the

Re: Help with S/MIME on Microsoft Crypto API

On 26-7-2005 9:14 Peter Palmreuther wrote: Hello Peter, On Tuesday, July 26, 2005 at 12:21:10 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote: ...snip Sorry I can not help you with this :-( Seems I don't get only TB! to behave this way, it's just I don't want to use Outlook or Outlook Express for sending mails

Re: Help with S/MIME on Microsoft Crypto API

Hello Henk, On Tuesday, July 26, 2005 at 9:34:26 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote: HMdB Sorry I can not help you with this :-( No problem. Seems I don't get only TB! to behave this way, it's just I don't want to use Outlook or Outlook Express for sending mails signed with this certificate ;-) HMdB

Version Numbers

Hello Group I have had an email telling me that version 3.51 is available. I am running 3.5.26 and I'm confused about the numbering. Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please? -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK :Jeff_Gaines: Using 3.5.26 Current

Re: Version Numbers

Hello Jeff Gaines everyone else, on 26-Jul-2005 at 18:38 you (Jeff Gaines) wrote: Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please? Yes. The version numbering system was changed a little bit. Quoting developer 9Val from the beta list: .- | 3.51.10 | | 3 = the major version number | 51 = first cipher

Re: Version Numbers

Good day, Jeff. JG I have had an email telling me that version 3.51 is available. I am JG running 3.5.26 and I'm confused about the numbering. JG Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please? This is newest public release. -- WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [email only]|[3MB

Re: Version Numbers

Hello Jeff, On Tuesday, July 26, 2005, at 12:38:35 PM, you wrote re: Version Numbers: JG I have had an email telling me that version 3.51 is available. I am JG running 3.5.26 and I'm confused about the numbering. Many of us are. There is a similar discussion occurring on the beta list. JG Is

Re: Help with S/MIME on Microsoft Crypto API

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:22:15 +0200GMT (26-7-2005, 18:22 +0200, where I live), Peter Palmreuther wrote: Hello Peter, On Tuesday, July 26, 2005 at 9:34:26 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote: HMdB Sorry I can not help you with this :-( No problem. It confuses me even more with it's S/MIME / security

Re[2]: Version Numbers

Hello Group On Tuesday, July 26, 2005, 5:48:59 PM, Alexander wrote: ...and besides that, 51 is of course larger than 5, isn't that obvious? :-D *hehe* Maths is not my strongest subject :-) Thanks! -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK :Jeff_Gaines: Using TheBat! 3.5.26

Re: Version Numbers

Hi Alexander, On Tuesday, July 26, 2005, 12:48:59, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please? Yes. The version numbering system was changed a little bit. Quoting developer 9Val from the beta list: And where does 3.5.30 fit in? Roman -- We know that the nature of genius is