reply to macro and addressbook issue

2007-01-22 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone, I am using the %OFromFName macro in my reply templates and believe this is based on how the incoming email is received (ie how the sender configured his email address or header). I often notice that this is not working well as the output is unsuitable, e.g. one of my contacts

Re: reply to macro and addressbook issue

2007-01-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:31:51 +1100GMT (22-1-2007, 12:31 +0100, where I live), you wrote: T I am using the %OFromFName macro in my reply templates and believe T this is based on how the incoming email is received (ie how the sender T configured his email address or header). That's

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Dwight, -- Montag, 22. Januar 2007, 03:47:47: [...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded as bad people who need to be protected from themselves I agree to this. In fact there where numerous discussions on this topic. Personally I also think an eMail should

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Eddie, On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:50:23 +0100 GMT (22/01/2007, 19:50 +0700 GMT), Eddie Castelli wrote: [...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded as bad people who need to be protected from themselves EC I agree to this. Well, I don't. EC In fact there where

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Dwight! On Sunday, January 21, 2007, 8:47 PM, you wrote: Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply but for filing. this, and being able to edit text have been longstanding requests of some, which have been opposed, and not adopted because users who wish to do

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 6:50:23 AM, Eddie Castelli wrote: Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)? THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it. it is a WORKAROUND. and a not very satisfactory one at that. I guess I am going to hell or to

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Thomas! On Monday, January 22, 2007, 8:43 AM, you wrote: [...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded as bad people who need to be protected from themselves EC I agree to this. Well, I don't. EC In fact there where numerous discussions on this topic. True,

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Dwight! On Monday, January 22, 2007, 9:18 AM, you wrote: Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)? THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it. it is a WORKAROUND. and a not very satisfactory one at that. I guess I am going to hell or to

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Marten Gallagher
In a time where Governments are thinking of considering eMail as a legal document it it more than being a 'bad person' altering such a document (also when there is a possibility through exporting and re-importing. An email is only able to be regarded as a legal document to the same level as a

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Marten Gallagher
Hello Thomas! On Monday, January 22, 2007, 8:43 AM, you wrote: [...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded as bad people who need to be protected from themselves EC I agree to this. Well, I don't. EC In fact there where numerous discussions on this topic. True,

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Doug Weller
Hi Mary, Monday, January 22, 2007, 3:38:01 PM, you wrote: Hello Dwight! On Monday, January 22, 2007, 9:18 AM, you wrote: Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)? THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it. it is a WORKAROUND. and a not

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Doug Weller
Hi Eddie, Monday, January 22, 2007, 12:50:23 PM, you wrote: Dear Dwight, -- Montag, 22. Januar 2007, 03:47:47: [...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded as bad people who need to be protected from themselves I agree to this. In fact there where numerous

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Doug! On Monday, January 22, 2007, 11:10 AM, you wrote: Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)? THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it. So if I want to do a fast search of subject lines anything in memo will show up? No, it won't.

Re: Vanished mail file

2007-01-22 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Graham, Thursday, January 18, 2007, 19:38:00, you wrote: However, if anyone can explain why this might have occurred, I would be extremely grateful. What is the partition type where you keep The Bat! files (TBB)? Is it a FAT or NTFS partition? -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin

Re: Vanished mail file

2007-01-22 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Maxim, Monday, January 22, 2007, 6:42:25 PM, you wrote: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 19:38:00, you wrote: However, if anyone can explain why this might have occurred, I would be extremely grateful. What is the partition type where you keep The Bat! files (TBB)? Is it a FAT or NTFS

Re[2]: Vanished mail file

2007-01-22 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Graham, Monday, January 22, 2007, 21:01:54, you wrote: What is the partition type where you keep The Bat! files (TBB)? Is it a FAT or NTFS partition? NTFS Thank you, could you please check the options of this folder, is Compress folder on exit checked on? -- Best regards, Maxim

Re: Vanished mail file

2007-01-22 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Maxim, Monday, January 22, 2007, 7:34:26 PM, you wrote: What is the partition type where you keep The Bat! files (TBB)? Is it a FAT or NTFS partition? NTFS Thank you, could you please check the options of this folder, is Compress folder on exit checked on? No, unfortunately, as I

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Urban
Monday, January 22, 2007, Mary Bull wrote: But only helpful if there are meaningful subject lines, using words relevant to the body text's content. Memo is no substitute. So forward it to yourself and change the subject line. -- Urban I believe you should live each day as if it is your

Combined/truncated messages?

2007-01-22 Thread Kitty
I have recently had some unusual problems with emails. For example, here is an email which starts out as a message to one mailing list and then in the middle switches to an entirely different message sent to another mailing list. In the below quote, everything up to regularly. is one message and

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Urban! On Monday, January 22, 2007, 2:00 PM, you wrote: But only helpful if there are meaningful subject lines, using words relevant to the body text's content. Memo is no substitute. So forward it to yourself and change the subject line. Yes, Urban, that's another nice work-around.

Re: Combined/truncated messages?

2007-01-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Kitty, On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:04:16 -0600GMT (22-1-2007, 21:04 +0100, where I live), you wrote: KV I have recently had some unusual problems with emails. KV For example, here is an email which starts out as a message to one KV mailing list and then in the middle switches to an entirely

Re: Combined/truncated messages?

2007-01-22 Thread Kitty
That's odd behaviour. Is this happening to one account or to multiple accounts? When inspecting the messages via webmail, are they listed correct on the server? (You might try to keep messages one day at the server, so you can inspect messages that show up corrupted in TB.) I've only

Re[2]: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread rich gregory
U So forward it to yourself and change the subject line. But that would alter the correct sender ID and time stamp. -- Beautiful Butterfly Displays http://FramedButterflyArt.com Random tagline: A liberal is a person whose interests aren't at stake at the moment. - Willis Player

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Robin Anson
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 at 19:12:07 -0500, Rich wrote: U So forward it to yourself and change the subject line. But that would alter the correct sender ID and time stamp. Hence the approach I suggest in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], which is also what Marten refers to in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Robin

Re[2]: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread rich gregory
EC In fact there where numerous discussions on this topic. TF True, but [un]resolved. UNRESOLVABLE. This topic is similar in tone to a religious war for some reason! Those who insist that the integrity of an email should be unassailable seem wholly unable to compromise. Nobody else cares, and

Re: Combined/truncated messages?

2007-01-22 Thread Chris W .
Kitty @ 2007-1-22 4:07:03 PM Combined/truncated messages? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've only noticed it on 1 account but I only have one account that I get much mail on. It goes even beyond what I posted. For example, I found a message in a strange folder and so I looked at the headers. There

Re: Editing Received Messages

2007-01-22 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 2:00:53 PM, Urban wrote: Memo is no substitute. So forward it to yourself and change the subject line. work arounds are no substitute -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using IMAP with The