Hello Everyone,
I am using the %OFromFName macro in my reply templates and believe
this is based on how the incoming email is received (ie how the sender
configured his email address or header).
I often notice that this is not working well as the output is
unsuitable, e.g. one of my contacts
Hallo Tom,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:31:51 +1100GMT (22-1-2007, 12:31 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
T I am using the %OFromFName macro in my reply templates and believe
T this is based on how the incoming email is received (ie how the sender
T configured his email address or header).
That's
Dear Dwight,
-- Montag, 22. Januar 2007, 03:47:47:
[...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded
as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
I agree to this. In fact there where numerous discussions on this
topic. Personally I also think an eMail should
Hello Eddie,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:50:23 +0100 GMT (22/01/2007, 19:50 +0700 GMT),
Eddie Castelli wrote:
[...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded
as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
EC I agree to this.
Well, I don't.
EC In fact there where
Hello Dwight!
On Sunday, January 21, 2007, 8:47 PM, you wrote:
Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply
but for filing.
this, and being able to edit text have been longstanding requests of
some, which have been opposed, and not adopted because users who
wish to do
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 6:50:23 AM, Eddie Castelli wrote:
Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)?
THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it.
it is a WORKAROUND. and a not very satisfactory one at that. I guess I
am going to hell or to
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 8:43 AM, you wrote:
[...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are
regarded as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
EC I agree to this.
Well, I don't.
EC In fact there where numerous discussions on this topic.
True,
Hello Dwight!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 9:18 AM, you wrote:
Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)?
THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it.
it is a WORKAROUND. and a not very satisfactory one at that. I guess
I am going to hell or to
In a time where Governments are thinking of considering eMail as a legal
document it it more than being a 'bad person' altering such a document
(also when there is a possibility through exporting and re-importing.
An email is only able to be regarded as a legal document to the same level
as a
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 8:43 AM, you wrote:
[...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are
regarded as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
EC I agree to this.
Well, I don't.
EC In fact there where numerous discussions on this topic.
True,
Hi Mary,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 3:38:01 PM, you wrote:
Hello Dwight!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 9:18 AM, you wrote:
Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)?
THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it.
it is a WORKAROUND. and a not
Hi Eddie,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 12:50:23 PM, you wrote:
Dear Dwight,
-- Montag, 22. Januar 2007, 03:47:47:
[...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded
as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
I agree to this. In fact there where numerous
Hello Doug!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 11:10 AM, you wrote:
Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)?
THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it.
So if I want to do a fast search of subject lines anything in memo
will show up? No, it won't.
Hello Graham,
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 19:38:00, you wrote:
However, if anyone can explain why this might have occurred, I would
be extremely grateful.
What is the partition type where you keep The Bat! files (TBB)? Is it a FAT or
NTFS partition?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Hello Maxim,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 6:42:25 PM, you wrote:
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 19:38:00, you wrote:
However, if anyone can explain why this might have occurred, I would
be extremely grateful.
What is the partition type where you keep The Bat! files (TBB)? Is it a FAT
or NTFS
Hello Graham,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 21:01:54, you wrote:
What is the partition type where you keep The Bat! files (TBB)? Is it a FAT
or NTFS partition?
NTFS
Thank you, could you please check the options of this folder, is Compress
folder on exit checked on?
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Hello Maxim,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 7:34:26 PM, you wrote:
What is the partition type where you keep The Bat! files (TBB)? Is it a
FAT or NTFS partition?
NTFS
Thank you, could you please check the options of this folder, is
Compress folder on exit checked on?
No, unfortunately, as I
Monday, January 22, 2007, Mary Bull wrote:
But only helpful if there are meaningful subject lines, using words
relevant to the body text's content.
Memo is no substitute.
So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
--
Urban
I believe you should live each day as if it is your
I have recently had some unusual problems with emails.
For example, here is an email which starts out as a message to one
mailing list and then in the middle switches to an entirely different
message sent to another mailing list. In the below quote, everything
up to regularly. is one message and
Hello Urban!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 2:00 PM, you wrote:
But only helpful if there are meaningful subject lines, using words
relevant to the body text's content.
Memo is no substitute.
So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
Yes, Urban, that's another nice work-around.
Hallo Kitty,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:04:16 -0600GMT (22-1-2007, 21:04 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
KV I have recently had some unusual problems with emails.
KV For example, here is an email which starts out as a message to one
KV mailing list and then in the middle switches to an entirely
That's odd behaviour. Is this happening to one account or to multiple
accounts? When inspecting the messages via webmail, are they listed
correct on the server? (You might try to keep messages one day at the
server, so you can inspect messages that show up corrupted in TB.)
I've only
U So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
But that would alter the correct sender ID and time stamp.
--
Beautiful Butterfly Displays
http://FramedButterflyArt.com
Random tagline:
A liberal is a person whose interests aren't at stake at the moment. -
Willis Player
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 at 19:12:07 -0500, Rich wrote:
U So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
But that would alter the correct sender ID and time stamp.
Hence the approach I suggest in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], which is also what Marten
refers to in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Robin
EC In fact there where numerous discussions on this topic.
TF True, but [un]resolved.
UNRESOLVABLE. This topic is similar in tone to a religious war for some
reason! Those who insist that the integrity of an email should be
unassailable seem wholly unable to compromise. Nobody else cares, and
Kitty @ 2007-1-22 4:07:03 PM
Combined/truncated messages? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've only noticed it on 1 account but I only have one account that I
get much mail on. It goes even beyond what I posted. For example, I
found a message in a strange folder and so I looked at the headers.
There
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 2:00:53 PM, Urban wrote:
Memo is no substitute.
So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
work arounds are no substitute
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The
27 matches
Mail list logo