On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:09:01 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
What other protocol is there that will work across all platforms? Every
other form of direct process control is platform specific. The only things
you can count on are the basics on the OS level.
First, does it need to be cross-platform?
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:44:52 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
TB! will soon be on Linux.
Cool!
Which needs to be defined for each editor. Most editors can't even
implement anything more complex than a simple search and replace correctly. I
doubt they would even begin to consider this. No,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:29:43 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
It isn't sendmail, it is the delivery agent and only on mbox format. The
POP server that can read mbox format should also know how to unescape a From
like that.
Not sure about the latter. How would you tell the difference between a
line
Thought users of 3rd party email programs (competitors of MS Outlook)
might find this article amusing:
"Brown Orifice" Is Only The Beginning
http://www.i-want-a-website.com/about-linux/
Ken
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sewingwitch.com/ken/
http://www.harrybrowne2000.org/
Kill the
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 1:19:10 AM, you wrote:
JD Just an apology for the previous message. I thought I'd only selected
JD a small amount of text and then pressed F4. I then hit send
JD immediately. I've now set it to confirm immediate sending.
Ah, so that's the magic keystroke. Why isn't
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:19:27 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Same reason I detested it in PMMail when they implemented it. I CP
something in a message to something else and then hit reply. Whoops, the
entire message isn't there. The assumption is that marked text in an email
client's read window
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:03:19 -0500, Curtis wrote:
KP (I'd also like to see "move to folder and go to next/prev message"
KP on the toolbar (a feature I use a lot in PMMail).)
The 'go to next/previous message' buttons are already on the toolbar.
The Go to Folder button should be added, yes.
No,
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 15:04:47 -0500, Curtis wrote:
TB! did not originally have this feature. I among others suggested it
but there was some opposition, by others (I remember Steve Lambs
opposing arguments clearly :-)), to it's implementation. The best of
both worlds occurred. It was implemented
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:28:11 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 12:22:36 PM, Kenneth wrote:
One deficiency in PMMail is that if I select another folder from the
main window and then select next message from the reading window, the
reading window closes, instead of reading the
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:38:05 -0500, Curtis wrote:
OK, what you should do is go into the account properties and delete the
templates there. From then on, any new folder that you create will have
no templates defined.
I think a large part of my problem is the sparse and inconsistent help
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:42:26 -0500, Curtis wrote:
Can PMMail filter messages according to their age, size and other
similar distinguishing features?
I don't see those offhand as separate language items, but I do see
PROGRAM. This takes a path to a program and invokes that program with
the name
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 20:37:54 -0500, Curtis wrote:
I have a problem with it personally. Why can't the send action be made
to close the editor?
SL How is it supposed to?
If I knew I wouldn't be asking. I asked why can't it be done. I'm
actually giving PMMail the benefit of the doubt and assuming
12 matches
Mail list logo
