Hi Jim Lanyon
-
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, at 21:36:46 [GMT +] (which was 1:36 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Hello All,
> I have just received a company PDA with Windows CE. I would like
> to continue to use the Bat, does anyone know how to synchronise
Hi Tony Boom
-
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, at 12:20:40 [GMT +] (which was 4:20 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> Use a batch file to completely backup the registry entries and zip up the
> complete Bat directory and then schedule an ftp client, I use WS_FTP,
Hi WilWilWil
-
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, at 00:11:22 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:11 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Io,
> In the source of a message, I can see the date I've wrote it and
> saved. But if I don't send the message immediately, just save it, I
> can'
Hi Michael L. Wilson
-
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, at 16:08:42 [GMT -0700] (which was 4:08 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> My reply...
> I just tried it and it only took 9, and I was overwriting an existing
> file. Then a final click to close. So, 9 to run an
Hi Thorvald Neumann
-
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, at 07:53:03 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:53 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> That's what they told me when 1.xx was around... ;)
Exactly!
--
Best Regards,
Kevin
PGP Keys: idap://keyserver.pgp.com
idap:/
Hi Thorvald Neumann
-
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, at 13:23:58 [GMT +0200] (which was 4:23 AM where
I live) you wrote:
>> Just cehcking - if I do a full backup with everything everywhere
>> ticked, doe the filters (account specific, and global) get backed up
>>
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 19:44:54 [GMT -0500] (which was 5:44 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Otherwise, TB!'s IMAP is very frustrating when it
> comes to auto-filtering.
To say the least.
--
Best Regards,
Kevin
PGP Keys: idap://key
Hi Mean Drake
-
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 04:25:12 [GMT +0530] (which was 3:55 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Compressing reclaims space space locally and makes folder easier to
> read for TB by removing the dead space of already deleted mails from
> fold
Hi Mean Drake
-
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 03:26:53 [GMT +0530] (which was 2:56 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> This doesn't Purge. As I mentioned, only Folder>Compress+Purge as
> suggested by Kevin seems to work.
You can also try Folder/Maintenance and th
Hi Mean Drake
-
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 02:27:29 [GMT +0530] (which was 1:57 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Somehow I think there is a problem with IMAP folders. Using TB
> 3.0.
> What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to
> trash
Hi Paul Cartwright
-
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, at 15:20:18 [GMT -0400] (which was 12:20 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> to be honest, I tried TB with my fastmail account a while back, and gave
> up. I ended up deleting the fastmail account and stuck to POP3 ac
Hi MAU
-
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 12:35:56 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:35 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> You are not going to find anything better out
> there at the moment. Maybe prettier, but not better.
That depends on what you define as better. As an exa
Hi Bob
-
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, at 22:40:21 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:40 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Is there any way to change the size of the icons (glyphs) in TB! v3?
> Even when I use a glyphs.bmp file, the icons are spread too far apart
> and they tak
Hi Pete Holsberg
-
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 16:33:51 [GMT -0400] (which was 1:33 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> What other email clients have the ability to bounce emails?
Mulberry
--
Best Regards,
Kevin
Using The Bat! v3.0.0.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, at 01:33:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:33 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Then you don't get any support through this list then? Oh dear...
And why would you say that?
> Unlike every other bit of software on the
Hi MAU
-
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, at 20:21:54 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:21 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hello Kevin,
> Sorry, I don't use IMAP. And it is a workaround until Ritlabs decides to
> integrate the functionality in TB. Better a kludge than nothi
Hi MAU
-
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, at 12:13:30 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:13 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hello Alexander,
> Take a look at www.rancho-k.com :)
This does not work if one is using IMAP and it is a kludge at best,
IMO.
--
Best Regards,
Kevi
Hi Alexander S. Kunz
-
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, at 11:36:52 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:36 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Threading by
> references in TB is close-to perfect (the only things I am still missing
> are built-in function to manually add messages to
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, at 15:04:19 [GMT -0500] (which was 1:04 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Brave you are. :) TB!'s IMAP behaviour is quite unpredicable. Your
> friend may have a good time and thank for it. It's just as likely that
> he
Hi Chris Weaven
-
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, at 07:37:36 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:37 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> I've received some mails that are 'High Priority' and 'Low Priority' and
> there's nothing flagging them in my inbox to state this!? A quick F9
Hi Roelof Otten
-
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 21:15:20 [GMT +0200] (which was 12:15 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hallo Kevin,
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:37:15 -0700GMT (9-8-2004, 19:37 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:
KA>> I'm not so sure. I can go back and
Hi Zonnet
-
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 19:34:16 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:34 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hi Allie,
> The answer is Xray. I remove everything that is not strictly needed. I am
> slightly paranoid. I left the msg id in and TB uses that to
Hi Peter Meyns
-
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 18:59:28 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:59 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> Gerard's message threads correctly here, as do all the others of his.
> The In-Reply-To header doesn't seem to be needed when the references
> ar
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, at 20:02:58 [GMT -0500] (which was 6:02 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> The other mystery is what is happening to the In-reply-to header that
> TB! usually generates when a reply message is generated.
Good question.
Hi Roelof Otten
-
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, at 23:49:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:49 PM where I
live) you wrote:
AM>> I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
AM>> seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
Hi Michael L. Wilson
-
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, at 17:27:25 [GMT -0700] (which was 5:27 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> The version in The Bat! still lists it as 1.10.
Mine shows 1.11
--
Best Regards,
Kevin
Using The Bat! v2.12.04 on Windows XP 5.1 Build
Hi Alexander S. Kunz
-
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 17:56:22 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:56 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hello Kevin Amazon,
> 28-Jul-2004 17:43, you wrote:
>>> I always thought that this would automatically sign and/or crypt
Hi Alexander S. Kunz
-
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 17:32:20 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:32 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> I always thought that this would automatically sign and/or crypt the
> message?
%PGPMIME sets the PGP/MIME option to "on" for
the current
Hi Alexander S. Kunz
-
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 12:39:58 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:39 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> My constant annoyance is that apparently there's no way to tell TB to
> ALWAYS use PGP/MIME (the switch defaults to "auto" but I want it "o
Hi Dan Grunberg
-
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, at 10:13:46 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:13 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Is there a way of showing in a virtual folder, which folders the
> messages actually are in?
Yes, set up a view mode specific to your virtual fo
Hi Darrin Rich
-
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, at 18:10:45 [GMT -0700] (which was 6:10 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hello ,
> Batworld.de looks like it has a lot of information on the site. But
> since its not in english, I have no ideas what exactly is on
Hi Joey Lindstrom
-
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, at 11:49:04 [GMT -0600] (which was 10:49 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> So this is a known issue addressed in the beta you've mentioned? Cool.
> Next question: where do I download it? The download page at
> www.
Hi Joey Lindstrom
-
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, at 11:35:03 [GMT -0600] (which was 10:35 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> I've got about 9 or 10 email accounts. One of them checks a server on
> my local network, while all the others check a server on a remote
>
Hi Michael L. Wilson
-
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, at 20:44:24 [GMT -0700] (which was 8:44 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> I write a message in any of my accounts. I press end, and it just
> sits there. I close the message and save it, and go to the outbox,
>
Hi Bill McCarthy
-
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, at 22:43:12 [GMT -0500] (which was 8:43 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hello TB User Discussion List,
> I don't get this all the time, but about once a day - generally after
> TB! has been running smoothly for hour
Hi WilWilWil
-
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, at 13:33:54 [GMT +0200] (which was 4:33 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Really good remark. I use mail clients for years, as OE5, Office Outlook, and
> others, but never I've seen a spell checker for subject line.
> Th
Hi Robin Anson
-
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, at 13:36:43 [GMT +1000] (which was 8:36 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> By default port 123 is for the network time protocol. I don't know if
> that would cause the problem, but I believe the general advice about
> us
Hi Cory
-
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, at 12:10:41 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:10 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hi all,
> How can I achieve that all messages I sent are stored in the folders
> these msgs are sent from? (without creating filters for every folder)
Hi Zonnet
-
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, at 20:03:35 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:03 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hi Bat Users,
> I would like to hear from other TB user which version currently works best
> with TB and if there are any pitfalls to look out for.
Hi Plan9
-
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, at 22:54:04 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:54 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
> For me weird things have been happening all day as far a e-mail is
> concerned. I have been gettin
Hi Roelof Otten
-
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, at 14:29:22 [GMT +0200] (which was 5:29 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Try this in the menu:
> Folder -> Browse deleted messages
> Works for pop3 accounts, might work imap, though I don't have any
> experience wit
Hi 9Val
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 23:01:23 [GMT +0300] (which was 1:01 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Well, at home I'm working with IMAP at 21.6Kbit dial-up. So speed is a
> really *big* issue for me. And I prefer to use TB! without any
> synchr
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 12:38:35 [GMT -0500] (which was 10:38 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Kevin Amazon wrote:
> I think he's more thinking about simply changing a POP to an IMAP
> account. TB! autocreates correspondin
Hi Charles M. Gerungan
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 18:33:24 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:33 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
> that depend on beta software? IMAP support is constantly being wo
Hi David Boggon
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 17:31:58 [GMT +1000] (which was 12:31 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> um, my German isn't what it used to be ... how comes there isn't an
> equivalent site in English? could the authors stretch to a translated
>
Hi Mike Smith
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 08:29:57 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:29 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hi Kevin
KA>> Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
KA>> extremely happy with TB if you have some patience and willing
Hi Anubhav Roy
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 07:41:30 [GMT +0530] (which was 7:11 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> can anyone help..
> new to forum
> thanks in advance
>
> Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUD
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, at 21:08:21 [GMT -0500] (which was 7:08 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Kevin Amazon, [KA] wrote:
>> The key issues with regards to IMAP are:
> I wanted to add a couple other lacking features that are
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 00:42:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:42 PM where I
live) you wrote:
>> However, total IMAP functionality
>> isn't quite there yet...
> Aahh - now here's the rub...
> I need to know, before I jump - what functi
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, at 17:02:04 [GMT -0500] (which was 3:02 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Pretty much. I've been using it since January this year. I've seen it
> develop from being almost unusable to being much better as it
> currentl
Hi Julian Beach (Lists)
-
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, at 08:50:53 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:50 AM where
I live) you wrote:
>> FAQ on the web page developers' site:
>> Q: How do I protect my work so that people cannot copy the code?
>> A: You can't. But if yo
Hi Paul Cartwright
-
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, at 21:51:09 [GMT -0400] (which was 6:51 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2004, 9:09 PM, you wrote:
> I have also receieved some empty messages, with no subject, no TO:,
> almost no info whatsoe
Hi Allister Jenks
-
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, at 16:12:33 [GMT +1200] (which was 9:12 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Sunday, July 4, 2004, 10:33:11 AM, Kevin wrote:
> OK, I'm being a bit of a purist, but I feel in good company considering
> the extensive ant
Hi Allister Jenks
-
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, at 10:16:15 [GMT +1200] (which was 3:16 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Sunday, July 4, 2004, 4:19:03 AM, Kevin wrote:
>>> How can one change either the color of the table borders or the style
>>> (a single line ins
Hi Roland Burger
-
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, at 18:21:10 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:21 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> Unicode is also for me very urgent, because I cannot write Polish
> characters in the addressbooks and in all templates and quick
> templates!
Hi Costas Papadopoulos
-
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, at 17:21:28 [GMT +0300] (which was 7:21 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> Hello,
> Although I only use HTML formatted messages to the extent of less than
> 1%, I'm wondering if there is a way to change the Ta
Hi Charles M. Gerungan
-
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, at 01:02:13 [GMT +0200] (which was 4:02 PM where I
live) you wrote:
KA>> Outlook doesn't have to. This is the job of the mail server.
> What rfc states this? It isn't. Why would a mta do that if it doesn't
>
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, at 21:58:37 [GMT +0100] (which was 1:58 PM where I
live) you wrote:
>> You definitely can't change from POP to IMAP. I've tried this. You
>> have to create a new account and make it IMAP from the outset.
> DO
Hi Charles M. Gerungan
-
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, at 22:18:20 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:18 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Hello Kevin,
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:51:50 -0700 UTC, Kevin Amazon wrote:
KA>> As a matter of fact, we have our serv
Hi Charles M. Gerungan
-
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, at 21:40:44 [GMT +0200] (which was 12:40 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hello Roelof,
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:48:16 +0200 UTC, Roelof Otten wrote:
RO>> However you're posting garbage. Messages without Mes
60 matches
Mail list logo
