Hello.
I recently upgraded from 1.53t to 1.60k. Some of the anomalies that I
reported for version 1.53t in January
( http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg33264.html )
have been fixed. Others have changed behavior or remain unchanged;
they are listed below approximately in the
B-stok/PL, Sunday, February 10, 2002
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, at 11:17:32 (which was 12:17 where I live) you wrote:
>> What is TB! 1.53t which can be found at the beta site?
MDP> It is 1.53 with a couple of obscure bug fixes (I don'
What is TB! 1.53t which can be found at the beta site? Are there any
reasons to continue using 1.53d instead of switching to 1.53t?
I guess it's a beta since it is found on the beta site and not on the
official site, but why is it called "1.53t" and not "1.54 beta x" a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marcus,
On 10 February 2002 at 11:57:21 +0100 (which was 10:57 where I live)
Marcus Ohlström wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What is TB! 1.53t which can be found at the beta site?
It is 1.53 with a couple of
Marck,
Thank you. I'll wait for the release one.
Thank you for writing
On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 01:37:17, Marck wrote about:
Bat! 1.53t Anomalies
>> Marck, Where can I download ver 1.53t ?
> It is can be downloaded from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 19 January 2002 at 02:51:24 +0100 (which was 01:51 where I live)
Andrew Aronoff wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points:
> If you'd like me to submit certain items to RITLABS
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, please let me know.
Your l
uable at any point in time. It appears that
a few of the anomalies I've listed were not previously reported. You'd
do the project team a service by reporting them. If you'd like me to
submit certain items to RITLABS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, please let me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 18 January 2002 at 20:48:17 +0100 (which was 19:48 where I
live)Andrew Aronoff wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points:
MDP>> I... doubt the validity of *any* of these tests. I feel they are
MDP>> a waste of time
> I'm not s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Shahar,
On 18 January 2002 at 20:02:49 +0200 (which was 18:02 where I
live)Shahar wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points:
> Marck, Where can I download ver 1.53t ?
It is can be downloaded from the Beta FTP site.
> Is it the c
because we've never seen it before.
Also used: It's Windows.
4. So what do you expect?
Also used: Don't antagonize the programmers.
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Windows 2000 Pro SP2]
--
Archives : http://tbudl
Marck,
Where can I download ver 1.53t ?
Is it the current version ?
Thank you all.
Thank you for writing
On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 18:11:40, Marck wrote about:
Bat! 1.53t Anomalies
--
Archives : http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 18 January 2002 at 15:54:49 +0100 (which was 14:54 where I
live)Andrew Aronoff wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points:
> FOA, there are *three* anomalies listed in my message. This is only
> half of the first one. That is, a
of a message "body" after its "attachments" have been deleted. ;-)
Can you reproduce these anomalies?
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Windows 2000 Pro SP2]
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 17 January 2002 at 11:00:07 +0100 (which was 10:00 where I
live)Andrew Aronoff wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points:
> 6. Leaving the last attachment
Right. Thanks for sending the example mail. This is an easy one. TB is
as the initial of the first
name and beginning letters of the last name if the e-mail address
starts off with the same letters.
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Windows 2000 Pro SP2
on a "made from scratch" PIII-500 MHz/384 MB RAM]
--
__
Hello Andrew,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:01:17 +0100 GMT (17/01/02, 19:01 +0800 GMT),
Andrew Aronoff wrote:
AA> 2. Hidden addresses... not
AA> I'll repeat here the question I asked him: "Why [would I] want to hide
AA> an address in the main view and display it when I'm actually looking
AA> for an a
_horizontal scroll bar_. There is
no overlap when using the space bar because the scroll bar hides the
last line of text in the first screen.
Is this anomaly reproducible on your system?
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Wi
Probably ... but it wouldn't fit ;-).
Then it's an anomaly, not a feature. ;-)
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Windows 2000 Pro SP2]
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 17 January 2002 at 13:42:12 +0100 (which was 12:42 where I live)
Andrew Aronoff wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points:
> IOW, to clarify the "Hide items..." checkbox, would "Hide items when
> consulting the Address Book (wh
est
how to revise the wording of the 'Hide items...' checkbox."
IOW, to clarify the "Hide items..." checkbox, would "Hide items when
consulting the Address Book (while still displaying them in the
'Address Pick List')" be more appropriate?
Thanks, Mar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 17 January 2002 at 11:00:07 +0100 (which was 10:00 where I live)
Andrew Aronoff wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points:
MDP>> .. The Address selector ... the root hides none.
> You're correct, but I don't understand why I'd
w to revise the wording of the "Hide items..." checkbox.
Thanks for your response!
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Windows 2000 Pro SP2]
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL P
lory the user), I ask that you provide a *single* example of
another program that provides such a default option under *any*
circumstances. (Want to to overwrite your file? Yes (default) No
Cancel)
I've never, ever before seen a default option that erases saved data.
Thanks, Thomas, for r
Hello Andrew!
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 11:00:07 AM you wrote:
> You're correct, but I don't understand why I'd want to hide an address
> in the main view and display it when I'm actually looking for an
> address. Where's the logic in this feature?
I can't at the moment answer your quest
package 5.52.010, DualHead Clone & DVDMax enabled,
1024x768, 32-bit color) When I get the chance, I'll retry under
vanilla VGA.
Thanks for your input!
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Windows 2000 Pro SP2]
--
Archive
t". Yes, TB's correct behaviour
is reproducable. :-)
TF>> I would really like you to change to individual mails during this
TF>> thread (and other threads on which you participate)
AA> Done, at least until the end of this thread, at least for all messages
AA> _after_ this
Hi Andrew,
On 16 January 2002 at 18:00:02 +0100 (which was 17:00 where I live)
Andrew Aronoff wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points:
MDP>> Nicknames must be typed in full and do not complete until you
MDP>> tab out of the field.
> I do not yet believe this problem is unique to my sy
Andrew Aronoff ha scritto:
> Hello Mary,
MC>> if a nickname is associated with more than one e-mail address, TB
MC>> doesn't tell me, but just displays the first one.
> In principle, nicknames are supposed to be _unique_.
Sorry, I sent the message too quickly.
I meant *name", not nickname.
Hello Mary,
MC> if a nickname is associated with more than one e-mail address, TB
MC> doesn't tell me, but just displays the first one.
In principle, nicknames are supposed to be _unique_.
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Windows 2
Andrew Aronoff wrote:
> Hi, Thomas.
> 1. Nicked nicknames
TF>> Options / Preferences / System / Autocomplete.
> Yes, I've checked that and chosen "Default address book only".
> Nicknames work most of the time, but not all of the time, even with
> Ctrl+. As I said, I haven't yet spotted what
ddresses. These are the
addresses of all the mailing lists and stores that I've given
permission to send me mail. I also have an incoming mail filter that
requires all incoming mail to have Sender addresses in the address
book.
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Windows 2000 Pro SP2]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 16 January 2002 at 11:26:38 +0100 (which was 10:26 where I live)
Andrew Aronoff wrote to The Bat! UDL and made these points:
TF>> Options / Preferences / System / Autocomplete.
> Yes, I've checked that and chosen "Default address boo
dividual mails during this
TF> thread (and other threads on which you participate)
Done, at least until the end of this thread, at least for all messages
_after_ this reply.
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.53t under Windows 2000 Pro SP2
on a "made from scratch" PIII-500 MHz/384 MB R
ny reply I make to a message will *not*
AA> be threaded correctly in TB!
I would really like you to change to individual mails during this
thread (and other threads on which you participate), so that your
valuable contributons *are* threaded correctly in TB.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der
orted to the TB! developers as a bug.
I'll update this list as I find new items. If an item is confirmed
elsewhere, I'll submit a bug report. If the item is incorrectly
listed, I'll remove it. All comments are welcome.
regards, Andy
P.S.: I'm on the digest, so any reply I
Hello Luc,
13. januar 2002, 18:04:25, you wrote:
L> www.winace.com handles all files, has a neat interface and is simple
L> to use
It's interface is much too bloated IMO, and it doesn't have a usable
command-line version (console version - it always opens the GUI
window). Even though it compr
It was foretold that on 13-1-2002 @ 08:40:41 GMT+0100 (which was 8:40
where I live) Ottar Grimstad wrote and spread these wise comments on
"1.53t":
OG> Hello Maurice,
OG> Sunday, January 13, 2002, 8:01:23 AM, you wrote to TBUDL:
MS>> May I suggest switching to
On 13 January 2002 at 09:12 Jernej wrote:
> Hello Ottar,
> 13. januar 2002, 8:40:41, you wrote:
OG>> ZipMagic www.mijenix.com handles rar-files and allow you to use
OG>> zip-files as folders so you can run programs from them and open
OG>> files wothout unziping to a seperate folder first
Hello Ottar,
13. januar 2002, 8:40:41, you wrote:
OG> ZipMagic www.mijenix.com handles rar-files and allow you to use
OG> zip-files as folders so you can run programs from them and open
OG> files wothout unziping to a seperate folder first. Nice.
So does 7-zip (and it's own archive form
Hello Maurice,
Sunday, January 13, 2002, 8:01:23 AM, you wrote to TBUDL:
MS> May I suggest switching to 'PowerArchiver'
MS> (http://www.powerarchiver.com/) ? It can do all the things that
MS> WinZip can, but supports much more types of archives. After I
MS> tried it, I virtually immediately tras
On 12 Jan 2002, at 22:04:54 [GMT -0600] (which was 5:04 where I live)
Joseph N. wrote:
JN> Anyone know how ver. 1.53t differs from 1.53d? Or how to expand the
JN> .rar file?
RAR is a compressed archive format, just like ZIP. Most people use
WinZip to decompress .ZIP archives, because th
On 11 Jan 2002, 10:04:54 PM, Joseph N. wrote:
> how to expand the .rar file?
www.rarsoft.com
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.54/Abacus on Windows NT version 5,1
--
Anyone know how ver. 1.53t differs from 1.53d? Or how to expand the
.rar file?
JN
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
x27;ß' or similar, there will be no change.
OK, and what is the reasoning behind hiding the t version on the beta
page?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Anmeldung unter:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.53t
under Chinese Windows 98
the "official download version" 1.53d and version 1.53t there
> are some bugs removed with regards to S/Mime and to high ASCII
> characters in addressbook entries. I think 1.53t should be the
> "official" version on the (non-beta) download page.
I think the only change betw
tween the "official download version" 1.53d and version 1.53t there
are some bugs removed with regards to S/Mime and to high ASCII
characters in addressbook entries. I think 1.53t should be the
"official" version on the (non-beta) download page.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderato
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I don't see many (any?) people using v1.53t (I'm still using 1.53o). I
was wondering if anyone here is using v1.53t, and what has changed
since v1.53o?
Melissa
- --
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP_Keys_8&Body=Please%20se
47 matches
Mail list logo
