Hi
On Saturday 15 August 2009 at 5:06:43 PM, in
, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
> Did you try: Move to - %OAccount/%foldername
> Not tested, just an idea.
Good idea. The "/" is carried through as the first character of the
folder name - it needs to be "\" instead. Also, you meant "foldername"
rathe
Hello MFPA,
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:19:14 +0100 GMT (15/Aug/09, 22:19 PM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M> In a common filter, when defining a filter action such as "move to the
M> following folder," is there a notation that can be used in the folder
M> path to stand for the current account name? That is
Hi
In a common filter, when defining a filter action such as "move to the
following folder," is there a notation that can be used in the folder
path to stand for the current account name? That is, any message
caught by the filter stay in the same account but is moved to a
specific, named folder w
blems
with redirected, forwarded or created emails from filter actions.
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.71.03
with POPFile 0.22.4
on Windows XP 5.1
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Am I right in gathering that there are problems at the moment with the
3.80.3 release as regards creation of, redirecting of, forwarding of,
messages by filter actions?
My system relies heavily on this sort of capability and I wonder should I
hold off upgrading to the new version.
--
Marten
Hello Coyle306,
On or about Wednesday, July 09, 2003 at 07:54:46GMT -0400 (which was
6:54 AM in the tropics where I live) Coyle306 posted:
C> I have good success putting my spam catcher _after_ filters that
C> look for stuff I want to keep and read.
The problem is, the (dozens of) [EMAIL PROTE
Hello Allie Martin,
On or about Tuesday, July 08, 2003 at 21:09:28GMT -0500 (which was
9:09 PM in the tropics where I live) Allie Martin posted:
AM> For the spam messages, do you have 'continue processing with other
AM> filters' enabled?
Some did, some didn't, but it doesn't seem to matter. The
SS> The [EMAIL PROTECTED] filters ARE before the list filters, as there are specific
SS> text phrases such as "Ancient Toaist," "throbbing erections" and
SS> "Saundanese Arab Method" (I think you know the specific spam messages
SS> I am talking about!) and the text strings are specific and targeted
Hello Spike,
M>> Are your spam filter(s) before or after the mailing list filters?
M>> It looks like if for some reason you mailing list messages were
M>> catched as spam.
>
> The [EMAIL PROTECTED] filters ARE before the list filters, as there are specific
> text phrases such as "Ancient Toaist,"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul R. Dedrick, Cet, Csm, A+, [PRD] wrote:
PRD> Is there some explanation as to why the filters would work correctly
PRD> on the SAME messages, only now from the trash folder?
For the spam messages, do you have 'continue processing with other
filter
Hello MAU,
On or about Tuesday, July 08, 2003 at 17:40:18GMT +0200 (which was
10:40 AM in the tropics where I live) MAU posted:
M> Are your spam filter(s) before or after the mailing list filters?
M> It looks like if for some reason you mailing list messages were
M> catched as spam.
The [EMAIL P
Hello Spike,
> I am experiencing a strange behavior of my filters in one e-mail
> account only. Most or ALL of my mailing list messages are filtered to
> TRASH (where my spam messages are sent) instead of their designated
> folders specified in filters.
Are your spam filter(s) before or after t
Hello tbudl'ers,
I am experiencing a strange behavior of my filters in one e-mail
account only. Most or ALL of my mailing list messages are filtered to
TRASH (where my spam messages are sent) instead of their designated
folders specified in filters. However, if I _RE-filter_ the same
messages in
ke,
I assume you noticed that when you forward with a filter you will find
at the specific action tab a button to select an email address with next
to it a button for a template.
If you build a template here it will be used for only this filter
actions. This is much safer and avoids unseen BCC's
Hallo Spike,
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:35:37 -0500GMT (4-2-03, 14:35 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
S> I am trying to use a filter for specific incoming messages to be
S> automatically forwarded to a mailing list, and ALSO BCC'd to a
S> friend who doesn't subscribe to that list. I have an AB templ
Hello tbudl'ers,
I am trying to use a filter for specific incoming messages to be
automatically forwarded to a mailing list, and ALSO BCC'd to a
friend who doesn't subscribe to that list. I have an AB template
for that list, which when I MANUALLY forward a message to it,
also applies the BCC for
Hi Karin,
Friday, November 24, 2000, 8:27:06 PM, you wrote:
KS> Plus, open relays sometimes get closed. You'd need to update
KS> your list fairly frequently to keep tracks of changes, so as
KS> not to block regular e-mail. (Not to mention that real
KS> e-mail gets sent from open relays too.)
T
On 24-11-2000 at 13:46, A. Curtis Martin kindly wrote:
> Jamie Dainton graced us with these comments:
JD>> But if you can trace the origins of spam it will help you block
JD>> mails. There is a list of open relay servers floating about the
JD>> internet. If you set a filter which checks for the o
Hallo Allie,
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 07:46:00 -0500 GMT (24/11/2000, 20:46 +0800 GMT),
A . Curtis Martin wrote:
JD>> But if you can trace the origins of spam it will help you block
JD>> mails. There is a list of open relay servers floating about the
JD>> internet. If you set a filter which checks f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 08:24:01 +, Jamie Dainton graced us with
these comments:
ACM>> That article goes into how to trace the origin of spam, not how
ACM>> to filter it.
JD> But if you can trace the origins of spam it will help you block
JD> mails.
Hello A. Curtis Martin,
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:16:57 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, November 23, 2000, 14:16:57 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
A. Curtis Martin wrote:
ACM> That article goes into how to trace the origin of spam, not how
ACM> to filter it.
But if you can trace th
23/11/2000, A . Curtis Martin:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 12:31:50 +0100, Luca wrote these
> comments:
L>> I mean templates, macro ... I'd like to be able do send automated
L>> replies to the authors that I kill.
> If this is to spam then that is largely pointless.
No. It's for people who use to se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 13:32:35 +, Jamie Dainton wrote these
words of wisdom:
L>>> I mean templates, macro ... I'd like to be able do send automated
L>>> replies to the authors that I kill.
ACM>> If this is to spam then that is largely pointless. S
Hello A. Curtis Martin,
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 08:21:34 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, November 23, 2000, 13:21:34 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
A. Curtis Martin wrote:
L>> I mean templates, macro ... I'd like to be able do send automated
L>> replies to the authors that I kill.
A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 12:31:50 +0100, Luca wrote these
comments:
L> Thanx. I only can't understand what's the "manual only" choice used
L> for: I can't see how to activate rules manually, in selective
L> downloading.
I don't know myself. :=)
L> Most
19/11/2000, A . Curtis Martin:
> The documentation is rather poor and the Selective Download item is a
> revamp of the original Kill-filters item. Luckily it's very
> straightforward to use.
Thanx. I only can't understand what's the "manual only" choice used
for: I can't see how to activate rule
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 14:00:11 +0100, Luca graced us with
these comments:
L> Is there any way to perform filtering actions when dispatching mail on
L> server? E.g., can I automatically kill all emails form a certain
L> author, or with a certain header,
Is there any way to perform filtering actions when dispatching mail on
server? E.g., can I automatically kill all emails form a certain
author, or with a certain header, directly on my pop/imap server
without downloading the message body?
"Selective download" item in sorting office seems to be a
28 matches
Mail list logo
