Gmane stuff

Hello TBUDL, On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:33:03 + (UTC) GMT (31/03/2004, 14:33 +0700 GMT), Thomas wrote in : T> (I am writing this via Gmane's webinterface. ) The message took several hours to arrive. The reason is that Gmane sent an email to my address with the following te

Re: Gmane stuff

Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > T> (I am writing this via Gmane's webinterface. ) This here too. [...] > (I think I'll try that in a moment.) Testing... > The sig delimiter still worked when the > message arrived back here (via email list). It also cuts off at the sig delimiter

Re: Gmane stuff

Hello Thomas, On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:31:01 + (UTC) GMT (31/03/2004, 20:31 +0700 GMT), Thomas wrote: >> (I think I'll try that in a moment.) T> Testing... OK, this time I didn't get an email asking me to confirm that I exist. I guess it's a one-time thing, so that's OK then. But sorry for m

Re: Gmane stuff

Hello Thomas, Wednesday, March 31, 2004, 6:20:31 AM, you wrote: Thomas> Well. If I checked this email address in the office, I Thomas> wouldn't need to use Gmane's web interface now, would I? Or is Thomas> it only a one-time issue? (I think I'll try that in a moment.) It's a one time thing. Thom

Re: Gmane stuff

Hello Leif, On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:35:18 -0700 GMT (31/03/2004, 23:35 +0700 GMT), Leif Gregory wrote: Thomas>> Well. If I checked this email address in the office, I Thomas>> wouldn't need to use Gmane's web interface now, would I? Or is Thomas>> it only a one-time issue? (I think I'll try that i

Re: Gmane stuff

Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote: TF> OTOH it is good to know that I was not only talking to myself, but TF> I am glad that at least one person read my postings. ;-) Silent, but always reading. If it counts for something, I always ready your posts, and it's good that you're loudly experiencing Gmane