John Phillips @ 2007-8-05 3:50:41 PM
"Need help with filter"
> BTW a nice feature to see in Bat! would possibly be in "Properties"
> a list of all filters applying to a particular folder, or is this
> already available?
Filters don't apply to folders; they
Hello Chris,
Monday, August 6, 2007, 2:54:04 AM, you wrote:
>> I have three isp accounts. Looks like when you have more than one
>> isp, the Spam folder must be a common folder.
> I don't have that problem and I have 5 accounts. What version of The
> Bat! are you using? What anti-spam plugin (an
Hallo Gene,
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:33:52 -0400GMT (5-8-2007, 20:33 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
G> OK uh, then, if one (of several) of the subfilters is matched, is
G> the comparing stopped with the first matching subfilter or does it
G> test *all* subfilters.
It stops after the first mat
Hello Roelof,
Saturday, August 4, 2007, 8:50:39 PM, you wrote:
RO> Hallo Gene,
RO> On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 16:18:53 -0400GMT (4-8-2007, 22:18 +0200, where I
RO> live), you wrote:
G>> I'm beginning to notice this sort of behavior, too. I am finding
G>> filters, that have been successful for a long ti
John Phillips @ 2007-8-04 5:15:03 PM
"Need help with filter"
> I have three isp accounts. Looks like when you have more than one
> isp, the Spam folder must be a common folder.
I don't have that problem and I have 5 accounts. What version of The
Bat! are you using? What
Hallo Gene,
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 16:18:53 -0400GMT (4-8-2007, 22:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
G> I'm beginning to notice this sort of behavior, too. I am finding
G> filters, that have been successful for a long time, that just seem to
G> stop working.
That would be odd. Never happens to me.
Hello Roelof and others
Sunday, August 5, 2007, 4:01:52 AM, you wrote:
JP>> I have a filter - first in the list - to pick up messages marked as
JP>> Spam by K9.
> Do you have any common filters running?
Yes, but
Figured it out.
I have three isp accounts.
Looks like when you have more tha
Hello Roelof,
Saturday, August 4, 2007, 2:01:52 PM, you wrote:
RO> Hallo John,
RO> On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:33:51 +1000GMT (4-8-2007, 13:33 +0200, where I
RO> live), you wrote:
JP>> I have a filter - first in the list - to pick up messages marked as
JP>> Spam by K9.
RO> Do you have any common fil
Hallo John,
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:33:51 +1000GMT (4-8-2007, 13:33 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JP> I have a filter - first in the list - to pick up messages marked as
JP> Spam by K9.
Do you have any common filters running?
JP> I have set up K9 to add to the beginning of the Subject the word
Hello John,
Saturday, August 4, 2007, 6:33:51 AM, you wrote:
> I have a filter - first in the list - to pick up messages marked as
> Spam by K9.
Someone on this list or TBOT helped me setup K9 the following way:
In K9 on the configuration tab select
"adding the following email header line" in
Hello John,
Saturday, August 4, 2007, 1:33:51 PM, you wrote:
JP> I have a filter - first in the list - to pick up messages marked as
JP> Spam by K9.
JP> I have set up K9 to add to the beginning of the Subject the word
JP> "{Spam}" (without the ").
JP> The filter reads:-
JP> Subject contains {
Hello Batophiles.
XP Pro SP2, Bat 3.99.3
I have a filter - first in the list - to pick up messages marked as
Spam by K9.
I have set up K9 to add to the beginning of the Subject the word
"{Spam}" (without the ").
The filter reads:-
Subject contains {Spam}
Move to \\myisp\Inbox\Spam
Mark as rea
On Sun 8-Aug-04 1:56pm -0400, Pete Holsberg wrote:
> Sunday, August 8, 2004, 1:57:25 PM, you wrote:
There's no need, with hotkeys, to add a filter for your harvesting
action.
>>> I don't understand. Without a filter, how do I copy
>>> the email address of each sender to a specific grou
Sunday, August 8, 2004, 1:57:25 PM, you wrote:
>>> There's no need, with hotkeys, to add a filter for your harvesting
>>> action.
>> I don't understand. Without a filter, how do I copy
>> the email address of each sender to a specific group
>> of an address book?
BM> You do need a filter. You d
On Sun 8-Aug-04 11:30am -0400, Pete Holsberg wrote:
> Saturday, August 7, 2004, 11:15:51 PM, you wrote:
>> On Sat 7-Aug-04 6:02pm -0400, Pete Holsberg wrote:
>>> I'm having trouble with a filter. Perhaps someone can spot
>>> my error.
>> I've not tested your filter with "refilter." I used it wit
Saturday, August 7, 2004, 11:15:51 PM, you wrote:
BM> On Sat 7-Aug-04 6:02pm -0400, Pete Holsberg wrote:
>> I'm having trouble with a filter. Perhaps someone can spot
>> my error.
BM> I've not tested your filter with "refilter." I used it with your
BM> hotkey. It appears to work fine with the
On Sat 7-Aug-04 6:02pm -0400, Pete Holsberg wrote:
> I'm having trouble with a filter. Perhaps someone can spot
> my error.
I've not tested your filter with "refilter." I used it with your
hotkey. It appears to work fine with the minor modifications I
mention below.
> Rule
>
>
> Source: I
Hello Pete,
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:02:57 -0400 (EDT) GMT (08/08/2004, 06:02 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
PH> (Question: is there a way to omit the source and just apply
PH> the filter via "refilter current folder"?
No, but I just remembered that it's an old wish.
PH> Is there a way to omit t
I'm having trouble with a filter. Perhaps someone can spot
my error.
Account > Sorting Office/Filters
Read messages > Harvest (that's its name)
Rule
Source: Inbox\04-01
Move messages to folder: Inbox\04-01A
(Question: is there a way to omit the source and just apply
the filter via "refilte
Hi Lars, hi list,
* Lars Geiger (LG) writes:
LG> Apart from that, ZA _can_ cause trouble. That's my personal experience
LG> with that software on various systems of friends, and all problems could
LG> easily be solved by ZoneAlarm'S uninstall routine.
Full ACK.
http://www.blood-thirsty-barbari
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Miguel A. Urech wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> > I should correct myself I guess... I've not seen ZoneAlarm correcting file
> > extensions because 'it' thought they were 'harmful'. That to me would be
> > more of an inconvenience than a feature... especially the amount of fiels
Hello Jonathan,
> I should correct myself I guess... I've not seen ZoneAlarm correcting file
> extensions because 'it' thought they were 'harmful'. That to me would be
> more of an inconvenience than a feature... especially the amount of fiels
> I get sent.
Do you think that the Options/Prefere
ust the subject line whenever the topic drifts
entirely to something completely different. Or otherwise threading or any
sort won't do much for you.
Let he who wants help with Zone Alarm able to locate it. And he who wants
help with filter able to toss this thread right away.
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Michael Disabato wrote:
> Sunday, May 5, 2002, 1:55:34 PM, Jonathan scribbled:
>
> JA> On Sun, 5 May 2002, Michael Kellogg wrote:
>
> >> For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
> >> people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-bla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 1:55:34 PM, Jonathan scribbled:
JA> On Sun, 5 May 2002, Michael Kellogg wrote:
>> For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
>> people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank
>> HTM
Hello Lars Geiger,
On Sun, 5 May 2002 22:44:41 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, May 6, 2002, 3:44:41 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Lars Geiger wrote:
> Hi Georg,
> On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 21:34:10 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
GAK>> I've been using ZoneAlarm for more than 18 months w
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On Sun, 5 May 2002 21:39:20 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, May 6, 2002, 2:39:20 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>> one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is
>> a ".zl?" file, where "?" = 3 or 9 usuall
Hello Lars Geiger,
On Sun, 5 May 2002 21:00:11 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, May 6, 2002, 2:00:11 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Lars Geiger wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 11:25:18 [GMT -0700], you wrote:
MK>> For some reason I have been getting emails - no do
I should correct myself I guess... I've not seen ZoneAlarm correcting file
extensions because 'it' thought they were 'harmful'. That to me would be
more of an inconvenience than a feature... especially the amount of fiels
I get sent.
My apologise for causing any confusion ;)
On Sun, 5 May 2002,
Hi stuart,
On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 21:53:45 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
LG>> The problem with a "personal firewall" is that the security it can
LG>> offer is rather limited (or "almost 0").
sw> Care to back that statement up with some evidence?
Most of this was already in my last message, althoug
Hello Lars,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 9:44:41 PM, you wrote:
LG> The problem with a "personal firewall" is that the security it can offer
LG> is rather limited (or "almost 0"). These kind of programs make a user
LG> believe that (s)he has installed a "really effective" program to protect
LG> his/her
Hi Georg,
On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 21:34:10 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
GAK> I've been using ZoneAlarm for more than 18 months without any
GAK> trouble. I think it's great. There are a couple of alternatives
GAK> (like Tiny),
The problem with a "personal firewall" is that the security it can offer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 11:25:18 AM PST, Michael Kellogg wrote:
> ...with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank HTML file, one is some
> decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is a ".zl?" file, where
> "?" = 3 or 9 usually.
As Miguel mentio
Hello Michael,
> one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is
> a ".zl?" file, where "?" = 3 or 9 usually.
The zl? extensions are because they have been quarantined by
ZoneAlarm.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
LG> A .zl? file is created by ZoneAlarm, which changes the extension of
LG> certain attachments on incoming messages as a security measure. IMHO,
LG> you should get rid of that program. This will save you much trouble.
I've been using ZoneAlarm for
Hello Michael,
05. maj 2002, 20:25:18, you wrote:
MK> For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
MK> people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank
MK> HTML file, one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is
MK> a ".zl?" file, where "
Hi Michael,
On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 11:25:18 [GMT -0700], you wrote:
MK> For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
MK> people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank
MK> HTML file, one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one
MK> is a
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Michael Kellogg wrote:
> For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
> people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank
> HTML file, one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is
> a ".zl?" file, where "?" = 3 or 9 usua
For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank
HTML file, one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is
a ".zl?" file, where "?" = 3 or 9 usually.
I created a filter that processes incoming mai
39 matches
Mail list logo
