> Look in the Account Properties for the IMAP account, click on the Mail
> Management section. Look for the "For predefined folders..." section
> and make sure those are set correctly.
> Hope that helps.
I had stared and stared and checked and checked but still hadn';t
noticed that!
OK - next Q
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What does the <*> mean next to a folder?
It means that the preceeding number represents messages that are on
the server but which have not yet been sync'd locally.
> Why does the number of mails in a folder keep changing up and down -
> 2 then 0 then 2 then 0.
This wi
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, at 17:02:04 [GMT -0500] (which was 3:02 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Pretty much. I've been using it since January this year. I've seen it
> develop from being almost unusable to being much better as it
> currentl
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 00:42:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:42 PM where I
live) you wrote:
>> However, total IMAP functionality
>> isn't quite there yet...
> Aahh - now here's the rub...
> I need to know, before I jump - what functi
Marten Gallagher, [MG] wrote:
>> If you're referring to our little exchange a while back...
> Weell sort of!! :-))
I looked at all your other exchanges and couldn't see where else you
could have considered yourself treated a little harshly. :)
> I wasn't being terribly serious and I und
Kevin Amazon, [KA] wrote:
> The key issues with regards to IMAP are:
I wanted to add a couple other lacking features that are very useful:
a) selective download message text without attachments on a per
message basis. One can then view the message body over a slow
connection without having to do
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, at 21:08:21 [GMT -0500] (which was 7:08 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Kevin Amazon, [KA] wrote:
>> The key issues with regards to IMAP are:
> I wanted to add a couple other lacking features that are very useful:
>
Hi Mike Smith
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 08:29:57 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:29 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hi Kevin
KA>> Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
KA>> extremely happy with TB if you have some patience and willing
Marten Gallagher, [MG] wrote:
> The reason for possibly changing to IMAP is:
> ISP is prepared to install IMAP.
> and
> I can then do all the manipulation wheh I am (frequently) away from
> the office and the main machine.
> But.. as I said - I cannot afford screw ups becasue IMAP in the event
Hello Admin,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:47:45 +0100 UTC, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aacu> If I change to IMAP (all are currently POP3) will I compromise any of
aacu> that functionality - I earn my living using TB!
If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
that depend on beta
Hi Charles M. Gerungan
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 18:33:24 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:33 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
> that depend on beta software? IMAP support is constantly being wo
Kevin Amazon wrote:
> 1. The conversion facility to transfer a POP3 message to IMAP
> "should be" nothing more than a drag and drop from one folder to
> another.
I think he's more thinking about simply changing a POP to an IMAP
account. TB! autocreates corresponding IMAP folders on the server and
Hello Allie,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:38:35 -0500 UTC, Allie Martin wrote:
AM> When I watch TB! do a single task, it's very fast. However, when I
AM> request a message body, I often have to wait a while at work while TB!
AM> completes what's already queued to be done.
I was about to say something a
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 12:38:35 [GMT -0500] (which was 10:38 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Kevin Amazon wrote:
> I think he's more thinking about simply changing a POP to an IMAP
> account. TB! autocreates corresponding IMAP folders
Hi 9Val
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 23:01:23 [GMT +0300] (which was 1:01 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Well, at home I'm working with IMAP at 21.6Kbit dial-up. So speed is a
> really *big* issue for me. And I prefer to use TB! without any
> synchr
Hello 9Val,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:01:23 +0300 UTC, 9Val wrote:
9> May be Thunderbird is faster on wide connections, don't know and have
9> no possibility to test
UI wise, TB! is faster on a Pentium II with 256M of memory, Firefox and
two PuTTY windows open. IMAP wise, TB (no exclamation mark, s
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> What does the <*> mean next to a folder?
[etc etc]
>> I got my knuckles rapped yesterday!
> If you're referring to our little exchange a while back...
Weell sort of!! :-)) I wasn't being terribly serious and I
understood where you were coming from - I do t
> However, total IMAP functionality
> isn't quite there yet...
Aahh - now here's the rub...
I need to know, before I jump - what functionality is NOT there. My
problem is, not knowing what functionality is possible - I don't know
what's missing.
Will filter actions, auto-replies, auto-message us
Hi Kevin
KA> Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
KA> extremely happy with TB if you have some patience and willing to put
KA> in the time to learn.
KA> Hope this helps.
Very much so! Your postings have been very helpful to me in reading.
One of the problems Ive been
> Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 00:42:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:42 PM where I
> live) you wrote:
>>> However, total IMAP functionality
>>> isn't quite there yet...
> Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
> Hello Admin,
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:47:45 +0100 UTC, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aacu>> If I change to IMAP (all are currently POP3) will I compromise any of
aacu>> that functionality - I earn my living using TB!
> If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
> that depe
Hello Kevin,
KA> Actually, all the IMAP servers are local on gig ethernet. Speed is not
KA> an issue. I will admit some of the speed issues are the result of my
KA> TB settings. I have had so many problems with IMAP synchronizations, I
KA> finally flush all the caches on exit so, on the resultant
Hi Allie,
On Wednesday, July 7, 2004 21:08 your local time, which was Thursday,
July 8, 2004 at 03:08 my local time, Allie Martin [AM] wrote;
AM> c) support for colour coding messages or support for extra flags apart
AM> from the basic read/unread forward/redirected flags. Currently all
AM> other
Hello Charles,
CMG> Come to think of it, does TB! support the IDLE command?
Not.
CMG> Does TB! use multiple connections? TB (in my configuration) uses
CMG> 4 connections to the imapd.
Not yet.
--
:9Val:
_
24 matches
Mail list logo
