Hello Marck,
> I have evidence of a message with a creation date in 1998 that
> doesn't yet fit the 30 day retention criteria. So TB is clearly
> using received date for purging information.
Thanks for the confirmation :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2
Hi Mau,
@23-Nov-2003, 19:39 +0100 (23-Nov 18:39 UK time) MAU [M] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
M> ,- [ Keep messages in the base for n days ]
M> | The maximum age of a message allowed in the message base. If a message
M> | is older than this, it will be automatically deleted
Hello all,
In folder properties one can set for how long to keep messages. TB's
help says:
,----- [ Keep messages in the base for n days ]
| The maximum age of a message allowed in the message base. If a message
| is older than this, it will be automatically deleted from the message
| ba
Hello Stefan,
> Then you should park the threads you are interested in. This way,
> messages won't get deleted by purging.
No, parking is not the solution for what Paul (and others like me) is
looking for. Parking is the solution if I want to keep the thread for
ever (or a very long time), but th
Hello Thomas,
> I have set the expiration to 180 days. Haven't found a mailing-list
> thread that ran longer than that... ;-)
I set most my mailing list to just 15 or 30 days at the most. My message
base would be huge if I set these to 180 days. As I say in my reply to
Peter Meyns, I found this "
Hello Peter,
>>> Yes, indeed. It will mark the messages out of range as "deleted", and
>>> with the next "Purge and compress" they will be actually deleted.
>
PR>> It strikes me this could be somewhat inconvenient.
>
> Why is that?
My previous MUA had that capability. While there was at least one
Hello Paul,
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:19:54 +0100 GMT (16/08/2003, 04:19 +0700 GMT),
Paul Richardson wrote:
>> you could set your list folder to not expire messages at all
> Better, IMO. Then I could copy or delete the entire thread "manually".
I have set the expiration to 180 days. Haven't found
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Good [morning|afternoon|day|evening|night] Paul,
PR> It strikes me this could be somewhat inconvenient.
Then you should park the threads you are interested in. This way,
messages won't get deleted by purging.
- --
Regards,
Stefan
...Blessed is the end-use
Peter Meyns wrote:
> Why is that?
TBH, I suppose mainly because my previous e-mail client did not split
threads in this way; it wouldn't delete until the last message passed
the sell-by date.
> If I want to save a thread, I copy it to my "archive"
> folder, and let the mailing list continue its
Hi Paul,
on Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:05:44 +0100GMT (15.08.03, 22:05 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>> Yes, indeed. It will mark the messages out of range as "deleted", and
>> with the next "Purge and compress" they will be actually deleted.
PR> It strikes me this could be somew
Peter Meyns wrote:
> Yes, indeed. It will mark the messages out of range as "deleted", and
> with the next "Purge and compress" they will be actually deleted.
TVM
It strikes me this could be somewhat inconvenient.
--
Paul Richardson
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Servi
Hi Paul,
on Fri, 15 Aug 2003 20:38:44 +0100GMT (15.08.03, 21:38 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PR> If this setting is exceeded, will TB split an existing thread,
PR> removing those that exceed it and keeping those that do not?
Yes, indeed. It will mark the messages out of r
If this setting is exceeded, will TB split an existing thread,
removing those that exceed it and keeping those that do not?
Nothing in the Help file again.
--
Paul Richardson
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 3
13 matches
Mail list logo
