On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 3:09:19 PM, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
to Shahar about:
M$ Exchange Replacement
Here's my question: What would be the best configuration for the
install? I would like all the mailboxes to be stored on the server for
backup purposes and I'd like some
I was at a client's site yesterday and we were discussing the costs
and merits of upgrading their servers. After already receiving the
green light to proceed an idea hit me. 90% of the upgrade was due to
Exchange (long story), so why not just use The Bat! instead? I told
the client to wait a day
18 April 2002, 13:09, you wrote:
Here's my question: What would be the best configuration for the
install? I would like all the mailboxes to be stored on the server for
backup purposes and I'd like some employees to be able to share a
mailbox (tech support, that sort of thing). They are
wrote:
S On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 3:09:19 PM, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote to Shahar about:
S M$ Exchange Replacement
Here's my question: What would be the best configuration for the
install? I would like all the mailboxes to be stored on the server for
backup purposes and I'd like
Hello Michael,
I'm familiar with Pegasus, but I really like TB and would like to use
it as part of the solutions. Thank you for the suggestion though.
You don't need Pegasus. You can have a very nice setup with Mercury/32
as a server (it's free, BTW) and The Bat! as e-mail clients. This is
Point taken Clive.
I turned to the list because I figured there were others that had gone
through something similar and could offer some insight. This list has
proved very helpful in the past and is a fantastic resource.
Sorry if the post was inappropriate.
Michael T. Ashby
Consultant
The
Hi Michael,
On Thursday, April 18, 2002 at 08:39:29 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
MTA This list has proved very helpful in the past and is a fantastic
MTA resource.
MTA Sorry if the post was inappropriate.
I don't think that this is the wrong place to ask.
I think, I would prefer IMAP for the task
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, April 18, 2002 at 19:39:45 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
PP but there're cheaper and better SMTP/POP3-servers out there than
PP MS-Exchange :-)
PP Mercury (as we've read), MDaemon, ArGoSoft ... and for sure several
PP other Windows Mail-Servers.
There's another one, XMail from
Thanks to everyone for your feedback. It's been very helpful.
I'm actually shying away from having a mail server on the server.
Everything that they do is POP3 based and they don't have the typical
corporate mentality regarding e-mail. I'm thinking that simpler is
better, having been the
Hello Michael,
On Thursday, April 18, 2002 at 8:25:07 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
MTA I'm actually shying away from having a mail server on the server.
MTA Everything that they do is POP3 based
I'm sorry to tell you: even this is a server :-)
I understand that there is a server involved with POP3 e-mail, but
that server is located off site in a server farm. I just don't see a
reason to add ANOTHER server just to collect it.
They aren't using the PIM features of Outlook and TB is one of the
most robust e-mail client's I've found, so
11 matches
Mail list logo
