Re: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-24 Thread Michal Kozusznik
Hello A., Monday, October 23, 2000, 7:51:12 PM, A. Curtis Martin wrote: topic. Let's keep it like that. Adding more will only create confusion and an unnecessary bother which takes away from the spirit of the list Hmm. As you remember any subscription is re-posted by list-server. This

Re: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-24 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michal, On 24 October 2000 at 09:35:36 GMT +0200 (which was 08:35 where I live) Michal Kozusznik wrote and made these points on the subject of "Meaningful Subjects": topic. Let's keep it like that. Adding more will only create

Re[2]: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-24 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone, On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:51:35 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, October 24, 2000, 11:51:35 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MK Hmm. As you remember any subscription is re-posted by list-server. MK This mail could be

Re: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-24 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jamie, On 24 October 2000 at 13:15:07 GMT +0100 (which was 13:15 where I live) Jamie Dainton wrote and made these points on the subject of "Meaningful Subjects": JD I liked the mail server suggestion though. When a mail is r

PGP requests (was: Meaningful Subjects)

2000-10-24 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck! On Tuesday, October 24, 2000 at 3:37:04 PM you wrote: It's more a matter of educating people not to send the original key request to the list. This is a matter of making sure that folder templates don't contain %TO= macros. It's

Re: PGP requests (was: Meaningful Subjects)

2000-10-24 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dierk, On 24 October 2000 at 21:59:34 GMT +0200 (which was 20:59 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote and made these points on the subject of "PGP requests (was: Meaningful Subjects)": It's more a matter of educating people not to send th

Re: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Dierk Haasis, On Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:18:30 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, October 21, 2000, 17:18:30 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Dierk Haasis wrote: DH OK, I am not a moderator, so this is merely an appeal: could we please DH revert to *meaningful* subjects? Maybe

Re: [OT] Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread Christian Gassmann
Jamie Dainton wrote: DH OK, I am not a moderator, so this is merely an appeal: could we please DH revert to *meaningful* subjects? Maybe we could introduce a system of prefixes to the subject. Examples would be: [GH] = General Help [TBSC] = TB Slow or Crashing (could set autoresponder

Re: [OT] Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christian, On 23 October 2000 at 10:23:32 GMT +0200 (which was 09:23 where I live) Christian Gassmann wrote and made these points on the subject of "[OT] Meaningful Subjects": Maybe we could introduce a system of prefixes to t

Re[2]: [OT] Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread Marco Qualizza
... and (absolutely) last, but by *no* means least [DH]. That one's reserve for Myself, Curtis and Wolfgang. "Can you see what it is yet?". Yes! Dead Horse g! Hrm... I was gambling on "du hast"... as in "You got me there... you must hate me to ask such a tough question". (This is where all

Re[2]: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread Jan Rifkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi BatListers. In a post time stamped 07:21:21 +0100 re: Meaningful Subjects Jamie Dainton wrote: Jamie Maybe we could introduce a system of prefixes to the subject. Jamie Examples Jamie would be: Jamie [GH] = General Help

Re: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread A . Curtis Martin
to remember. In additon many (most) JR didn't use the codes accurately so we were right back @ the starting JR gate. Personally I think the list members here are literate enough JR to come up with "meaningful subjects" as requested by one of the JR moderators. Just my $.02 Agreed. There are t

Re[2]: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread Kari Jakobi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 =Original Message= From:A . Curtis Martin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Timestamp: Monday, October 23, 2000 19:51:12 To: Jan Rifkinson on TBUDL mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Meaningful Subjects [snip] ACM ... which

Re: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread George Mealer
On 10/23/2000 at 11:19 AM, Kari Jakobi wrote: KJ but, ummm, may i ask for a glossary of the common abbrev.'s on this KJ list, like *PITA* (isn't it a greek bread?), HTH and the others... http://www.tip.net.au/tip/help/hmailtla.htm It's a decent list, without being overwhelming. Searching

SOT: Acronyms (was: Meaningful Subjects)

2000-10-23 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, On Monday, October 23, 2000, 8:19:31 PM, Kari Jakobi wrote: but, ummm, may i ask for a glossary of the common abbrev.'s on this list, like *PITA* (isn't it a greek bread?), HTH and the others... would be great as i'm new to them Go to any search engine of your choice and enter PITA and

Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-21 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL Members! OK, I am not a moderator, so this is merely an appeal: could we please revert to *meaningful* subjects? I think I've had way too many "quickies" - that usually were not - and "simple questions" -

Re: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-21 Thread Christian Gassmann
Dierk Haasis wrote: OK, I am not a moderator, so this is merely an appeal: could we please revert to *meaningful* subjects? Agreed. I think I've had way too many "quickies" - that usually were not - and "simple questions" - that usually were not the last weeks on

Re: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-21 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:18:30 +0200, Dierk Haasis wrote: [snip] DH OK, I am not a moderator, so this is merely an appeal: could we DH please revert to *meaningful* subjects? That's a very good point Dierk and I henceforth make it an official

Re: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-21 Thread Michael Wieczorek
Hello Dierk! On Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:18:30 +0200 GMT, Dierk Haasis wrote: (at my local time: 21.10.2000, 18:18:30 +0200 GMT) Hello TBUDL Members! OK, I am not a moderator, so this is merely an appeal: could we please revert to *meaningful* subjects? Agree, too. -- Bye, Michael TheBat

Re[2]: Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-21 Thread Jan Rifkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi BatListers. In a post time stamped 12:24:57 -0500 re: Meaningful Subjects A. Curtis Martin wrote: A. [snip] DH OK, I am not a moderator, so this is merely an appeal: could we DH please revert to *meaningful* subjects

Re: Meaningful SUBJECTS - was Re: Stupid Question #349

2000-08-07 Thread Joe Finocchiaro
Saturday, August 05, 2000, 10:08:39 PM, Leif Gregory, wrote: [...] LG Moderator hat The first few times it was cute, but if everyone would LG please now put meaningful SUBJECT lines about the topic. Seeing LG "Stupid Question #347" and "Stupid Question #349", it's impossible to LG tell which

Meaningful SUBJECTS - was Re: Stupid Question #349

2000-08-05 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Joe, On Sat, 5 Aug 2000 at 15:18:46 [GMT -0500], you wrote: JF I discovered how to prohibit TB's splash screen from appearing JF (while opening) by using the command line, but is there a way to JF do it on a permanent basis? Moderator hat The first few times it was cute, but if everyone