-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 08 February 2001 at 21:01:38 -0500 (which was 02:01 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
>> WADR
MK> What does WADR mean? I have no idea what the acronym means.
"With all due respect".
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. P
Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK>> This question alone shows the lack of experience you have with
MK>> other e-mail clients.
> WADR
What does WADR mean? I have no idea what the acronym means.
> it shows that Jannik would be interested to hear a constructive view
> from you as to what could adequately r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 08 February 2001 at 19:36:33 -0500 (which was 00:36 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
>> I would very much like to learn, what you think could be a
>> better solution.
MK> This question alone shows the lack of ex
7; to 3 and 'Maximum Follow-Up Level:' to 15, this
helps makes more messages properly thread. However, the limitation to
message threading still exists.
**
> In my opinion, 1) is a very poor solution and is one of
Hello
Tuesday, February 06, 2001, 8:48:09 AM, someone claiming to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As you probably know, the news reader Agent solves all these
> problems by
> 1) putting a limit on how many follow up-levels there can be in a thread
> and
> 2) allowing control of the degree of
Hello Mark and other TBUDL's,
On Monday, February 05, 2001 at 15:47:18 GMT -0500 Mark Knipfer wrote on "!
1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading":
>> BUG: I found one annoying bug. In a message thread if you click on the plus
>> signs th
Hello Mark,
On Monday, February 05, 2001 21:56:07 [ -0500 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to '! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the
right, message threading':
Mark> [...] no ambition and initiative to report these problems to RIT
Mark> Labs since they will probably
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:54:59 +0100, Marek Mikus wrote:
> As I know, Stefan spends '6'!!! hours daily for mail support. If they
> will answer each bugreport and suggestion, when will they create code
> for TB? Nevermind!
I agree. A programmer's time is better spent coding rather than answering
e-
Hello all,
Tuesday, February 06, 2001, Mark Knipfer wrote:
>> While this is absolutely true and not acceptable for a large and fully
>> staffed software house, those of us that are more used to the lack of
>> response from the less well endowed labs accept that they are busy
>> guys and submit bu
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 03:40:44 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> MK> If this is true, then this may not provide other TB! users enough
> MK> initiative to report program bugs and problems since their effort,
> MK> time, and work is not worthwhile to RIT Labs.
>
> While this is absolutely true and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 06 February 2001 at 21:56:07 -0500 (which was 02:56 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
>> IMHO you probably won't. RITl labs have a strict policy of only
>> responding to the first originator of a new bug report.
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 21:19:36 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> >> .. If you do this through a long threaded message discussion, you will
> >> see the remaining Message List Columns just goes to the far right
> >> where you have to right scroll over to see them.
>
> MK> I have not received any w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 05 February 2001 at 15:47:18 -0500 (which was 20:47 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
>> .. If you do this through a long threaded message discussion, you will
>> see the remaining Message List Columns just goes t
Mark Knipfer wrote:
> In TheBat! 1.49 I am using the 'Full-height Account Tree' setting
> (View | Split Mode | Full-height Account Tree) and the following for
> message threading:
> View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
> View | Sort by | Received Time (C
Hello Mark,
(MK == "Mark Knipfer") [EMAIL PROTECTED] etched:
Just a few alternatives:
MK> View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
You can also use Ctrl + *(on the num pad) to expand all threads, and
you can simply hit Esc to display all messages.
As for expanding and retracting threads, yo
A. Curtis Martin wrote:
MK>> I may try this setup:
MK>> View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
MK>> View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1)
MK>> View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0)
MK>> View | View Threads by | Subject (Alt 2) <<-- change
ACM> This is the exact settings I use fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 11:21:44 -0500, Mark contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
MK> I may try this setup:
MK> View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
MK> View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1)
MK> View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 08:13:48 -0800, Nick thoughtfully wrote the
following:
ACM>> ... The problem with this being that any minor alteration of the
ACM>> subject breaks the thread and I've also noted that these subject
ACM>> threads break up for no appa
A. Curtis Martin wrote:
MK>> I prefer to view the message threads by References rather than
MK>> Subject since I am used to viewing message threads by References.
MK>> If I view threads by Subject, I may loose track of the discussion
MK>> -- the order of which the message are received and threade
On February 4, 2001, at 8:00:08 AM, A. Curtis Martin Wrote:
ACM> ... The problem with this being that any minor alteration of the
ACM> subject breaks the thread and I've also noted that these subject
ACM> threads break up for no apparent reason as well, especially when the
ACM> threads are very l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:58:54 -0500, Mark wrote these words of wisdom:
«--snip--»
MK> I prefer to view the message threads by References rather than
MK> Subject since I am used to viewing message threads by References.
MK> If I view threads by Sub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:54:10 -0500, Mark contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
«--snip--»
ND>> Beyond that, I do agree however that the way TB! expands threads
ND>> is annoying.
MK> At least I know I am not the only one thinks this.
This i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 07:51:33 -0800, Nick thoughtfully wrote the
following:
«--snip--»
NA> I've just found it easier and cleaner to view threads by Subject
NA> alone, and not bother with the References.
... The problem with this being that any mi
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA> On February 4, 2001, at 7:28:46 AM, Mark Knipfer Wrote:
MK>> View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
MK>> View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1)
MK>> View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0)
MK>> View | View Threads by | References (Alt 1)
NA> Mark, I have foun
Nick Danger wrote:
ND> Subject: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
ND>From: Mark Knipfer
ND> Dated: Sun, 4 Feb 2001, 10:28:46 (9:28:46 AM Local)
ND> ~~
M>> Because the last tw
On February 4, 2001, at 7:28:46 AM, Mark Knipfer Wrote:
MK> View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
MK> View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1)
MK> View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0)
MK> View | View Threads by | References (Alt 1)
Mark, I have found that if you simply view threads
Subject: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
From: Mark Knipfer
Dated: Sun, 4 Feb 2001, 10:28:46 (9:28:46 AM Local)
~~
M> Because the last two days I have been thoroughly analyzing the
M> program
x27;s to not to use it, except for a few minor con's.
In TheBat! 1.49 I am using the 'Full-height Account Tree' setting
(View | Split Mode | Full-height Account Tree) and the following for
message threading:
View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
View | Sort by | Received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Michal and everyone else...
MK> Is it possible to to add the counter (in further development of
MK> course), for number of mails in any thread ? Like in folder window ?
Absolutely. Just add the appropriate columns. Right-click the folde
Hello
Is it possible to to add the counter (in further development of
course), for number of mails in any thread ? Like in folder window ?
Best regards
--
*** Michal Kozusznik *** MaXyM/PicSaintLoup ***
*** music *** Taekwon-do ***
*** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
**
Hello Michal,
Tuesday, October 24, 2000, 9:19:56 AM, Michal Kozusznik wrote:
I hate to answer my own e-mails ;)
I've found it. In "View/View threads by" pull-down menu.
Sorry for a mess.
Best regards
--
*** Michal Kozusznik *** MaXyM/PicSaintLoup ***
*** music *** Taekwon-do
Hello
Someone wrote about this feature. In TB! help only in general
info is written about this one.
Can I get threading in mail window? Or in folders window using sorting
office ???
Best regards
--
*** Michal Kozusznik *** MaXyM/PicSaintLoup ***
*** music *** Taekwon-do
Hi Nick,
On 24 December 1999 at 11:49:06 GMT -0800 (which was 19:49 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
NA> All 5 will have the identical received time, so I'm wondering how
NA> TB time stamps the messages... as they are received at my POP
NA> Server, or as they
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Friday, December 24, 1999, 12:49:06 PM, Nick wrote:
> I'm using the latest version of TB, and I notice that my threading seems
> to be messed up somehow. For instance, if I download 5 new messages, and
> all 5 are of the same thread, I always find the original messa
I'm using the latest version of TB, and I notice that my threading seems
to be messed up somehow. For instance, if I download 5 new messages, and
all 5 are of the same thread, I always find the original message of the
thread put as the 3rd or 4th message, along with the other Re: messages,
and t
35 matches
Mail list logo
