On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 18:03:53 +0100, Carsten Dreesbach wrote:
I think I'll go for the Perl version, thanks! ;] Of course, this means
I'll have to write the script first, and not being too firm in Perl
_yet_... I'll let you know when I'm bald due to tearing out of my own
hair! *grin*
Marck
Hello Monbebe Admin,
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 at 14:02:40 (GMT +0100) [Tuesday, January 04, 2000
20:02:40 GMT +0700], you told to the list:
MA I have added "keep message in base for n (days)" to 90 days. Also
MA I have checked "Remove old messages on exit" as well as &qu
Hi Peter,
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 22:42:58 +0100GMT (01/04/2000, 05:42 +0800GMT),
Peter Steiner wrote:
The "received" time should apparently be equal to the *latest*
time stamp found in the Received: headers, IMO. If implemented
this way, many problems would have gone forever...
PS Are we
On Monday, January 03, 2000, 2:55:00 PM, you wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 18:03:53 +0100, Carsten Dreesbach wrote:
I think I'll go for the Perl version, thanks! ;] Of course, this means
I'll have to write the script first, and not being too firm in Perl
_yet_... I'll let you know when I'm
101 - 104 of 104 matches
Mail list logo