-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 10:38:44 -0400, Havivah D. Schwartz wrote:
ACM>> When you choose to move parked messages, a pop-up query appears
ACM>> asking if you 'really wish' to move parked messages. Under that
ACM>> query should be a checkable option to re-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 15:29:01 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
CW> Indeed. The lack of any response to requests for "sticky" status of
CW> many attributes too is rather odd. I just want to know if it is
CW> likely to happen or not, then i can shut up and e
Hi Allie,
ACM> When you choose to move parked messages, a pop-up query appears asking if
ACM> you 'really wish' to move parked messages. Under that query should be a
ACM> checkable option to re-enable parking at the new destination.
elegant solution. Have you sent this in as a suggestion?
--
Saturday, September 23, 2000, 1:06:44 PM, you wrote:
> When you choose to move parked messages, a pop-up query appears asking if
> you 'really wish' to move parked messages. Under that query should be a
> checkable option to re-enable parking at the new destination.
Glad you brought this sugg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000 01:45:11 +0200, Roel wrote:
ML>> 1) it's not intuitive to many (if not most) people, who tend to
ML>> think it's for keeping messages from being deleted; and
R> It is intuitive, if you think of it like a car: you put in in 'park'
Hi Ming-Li
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 07:51:35 -0700GMT
(which was 21/09/2000, 16:51 +0100GMT for me),
you wrote:
ML> 1) it's not intuitive to many (if not most) people, who tend to
ML> think it's for keeping messages from being deleted; and
It is intuitive, if you think of it like a car:
you put
On Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 12:08:00 AM, Oleg wrote:
KS>> (When you flag or colour a message and then move it, the flag
KS>> and/or colour move as well. I'd expect some kind of consistency
KS>> here.)
> Parking is a bit different from coloring and flagging. Parking
> is to prevent from
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Wednesday, September 20, 2000, Karin Spaink wrote to Januk Aggarwal about
Parking (was: Re: Questions (I'm still too new a user)):
KS> (When you flag or colour a message and then move it, the
KS> flag and/or colour move as well. I'd expect
On Tuesday, September 19, 2000, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> ... The debate comes down to, is the Parked status a property of the
> message or a property of the message in the current folder? It appears
> that the TB developers have chosen the latter.
> My personal opinion is that it should be a prop
On 20-09-2000 at 01:26, Januk Aggarwal kindly wrote:
[on how TB deals with parking, and unparks a message once it
gets copied or moved to another folder]
> My personal opinion is that it should be a property of the message, so
> moving or copying does not remove the parked status.
Nice summary
Hello Avenarius,
On Tuesday, September 19, 2000 at 22:03:06 GMT +0200 (which was 1:03 PM
where I live) witnesses say Avenarius typed:
> I'd vote the reverse. Parking -- an astounding, marvelous feature. How
> many times I accidentaly deleted an archived post in OE because I
> confused it wi
11 matches
Mail list logo
