Re: pgp/mime

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:10:37 -0500GMT (18-2-2005, 21:10 +0100, where I live), David Calvarese wrote: DC> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:50:31 +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote: HdB>> live), Peter Meyns wrote: PM>>> Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its own PM>>> implementation,

Re: pgp/mime test

Michael L. Wilson @ 2004-Sep-8 2:26:05 PM "pgp/mime test" > Let's see if it works with my new key It does. If you are going to use this new key, you should revoke the old one. -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. Using The Bat! v3.0 on

Re: pgp/mime test

Hello Michael, Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 3:47:30 PM, you wrote: PC>> nice, you can also add lines to a template, maybe something like this: PC>> %CLEARSIGN PC>> %SIGNCOMPLETE PC>> %NORCPTCONFIRM PC>> %NOUSESMIME MLW> I'm testing this QT that I named "sign", so let's see pgp verified just f

Re: pgp/mime test

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Paul, On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Paul mused about "pgp/mime test" (at least in part): PC> Hello Michael, MLW>> Let's see if it works with my new key PC> nice, you can also add lines to a template, maybe something like this: PC> %CLEARSIGN PC> %SIGN

Re: pgp/mime test

Hello Michael, MLW> Let's see if it works with my new key nice, you can also add lines to a template, maybe something like this: %CLEARSIGN %SIGNCOMPLETE %NORCPTCONFIRM %NOUSESMIME -- Best regards, Paul Current ve

Re: pgp/mime test

Hi Michael and list, On Wednesday, September 8, 2004 at 11:26:05 GMT -0700 (which was 20:26 where I live) Michael L. Wilson wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "pgp/mime test": > Hi, > Let's see if it works with my new key Works ok! -- Regards Michael p

Re: PGP/MIME

Hello Robert Golovniov, 28-Jul-2004 13:29, you wrote: > gpg: can't open `C:\Program Files\The Bat!\batD3F2.tmp' > gpg: decrypt_message failed: file open error > If I switch to PGP 8.1, pressing the button does nothing at all. Hmmm. I'm using neither GPG nor PGP8.1 - I'm on PGP 8.0.3 and it just

Re: PGP/MIME

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Robert, On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:17:53 +0300 (6:17 AM here), Robert Golovniov [RG] wrote in : RG>> gpg: can't open `C:\Program Files\The Bat!\batD3F2.tmp' gpg: RG>> decrypt_message failed: file open error RG> I am wondering w

Re: PGP/MIME

Thursday, July 29, 2004, 6:20:12 AM, Robert wrote: P>> This message produces a bad signature. Robert> So, this is because of the Cyrillic characters in the date. And what Robert> is the regex to automatically use the English date instead of Robert> Ukrainian? (This one should have bad s

Re: PGP/MIME

Hi Robert, on Thursday, July 29, 2004 at 14:05 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: RB>> gpg: Signature made 07/29/04 12:20:12 using DSA key ID 633F6D07 RB>> gpg: Good signature from "Robert Golovniov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > That's because for this message I had The Bat! + Gn

Re: PGP/MIME

Hi Robert, on Thursday, July 29, 2004 at 12:20 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: > So, this is because of the Cyrillic characters in the date. And what > is the regex to automatically use the English date instead of > Ukrainian? (This one should have bad sig also

Re: PGP/MIME

Hi Alexander S. Kunz - On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 17:56:22 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:56 AM where I live) you wrote: > Hello Kevin Amazon, > 28-Jul-2004 17:43, you wrote: >>> I always thought that this would automatically sign and/or crypt the >>> message?

Re: PGP/MIME

Hi Alexander, on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:56:22 +0200GMT, you wrote: ASK> Not everyone whom I exchange mails with privately has and/or uses PGP. ASK> For those that are not using it, I don't want to be bothered by requesters ASK> that tell me no key can be found (thats why I was asking if %PGPMIME AS

Re: PGP/MIME

Hello Kevin Amazon, 28-Jul-2004 17:43, you wrote: >> I always thought that this would automatically sign and/or crypt the >> message? > %PGPMIME sets the PGP/MIME option to "on" for the current message to > ensure that the PGJP/MIME format is used when the message is signed OR > encrypted. Obvio

Re: PGP/MIME

Hi Alexander S. Kunz - On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 17:32:20 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:32 AM where I live) you wrote: > I always thought that this would automatically sign and/or crypt the > message? %PGPMIME sets the PGP/MIME option to "on" for the current

Re: PGP/MIME

Hello Kevin Amazon, 28-Jul-2004 16:27, you wrote: >> My constant annoyance is that apparently there's no way to tell TB to >> ALWAYS use PGP/MIME (the switch defaults to "auto" but I want it "on"). > You could put %pgpmime in your templates. I always thought that this would automatically sign a

Re: PGP/MIME

Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 10:17:47 AM, Robert wrote: Robert> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Robert> Hash: SHA1 Robert> On July 28, 2004, 15:55:57, Plan9 wrote: P>> Robert, when I look at my PGPLog file, under the "Signed" column it P>> says that your key has a bad signature. Robert> You ar

Re: PGP/MIME

Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 10:17:07 AM, Robert wrote: Robert> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Robert> Hash: SHA1 Robert> On 28 eeiiy 2004 ?., 15:55:57, Plan9 wrote: P>> Robert, when I look at my PGPLog file, under the "Signed" column it P>> says that your key has a bad signature. Robert> You

Re: PGP/MIME

Hi Alexander S. Kunz - On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 12:39:58 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:39 AM where I live) you wrote: > My constant annoyance is that apparently there's no way to tell TB to > ALWAYS use PGP/MIME (the switch defaults to "auto" but I want it "o

Re: PGP/MIME

Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 7:29:09 AM, Robert wrote: ASK>> What is your problem with it? Robert> When I get such a message, I press the encryption button in the right Robert> corner and get the dialog box asking me to enter the passphrase. I do Robert> and get something like this: Robert> gpg:

Re: PGP/MIME

Hi Robert, on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:13:09 +0300GMT, you wrote: RG> Can anybody share with me his success story of reading PGP/MIME RG> signed and encrypted messages? It works the same as inline encrypted messages, provided both correspondents use PGP/MIME capable clients. I'll send you a

Re: PGP/MIME

Hi Alexander, on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:39:58 +0200GMT, you wrote: ASK> My constant annoyance is that apparently there's no way to tell TB to ASK> ALWAYS use PGP/MIME (the switch defaults to "auto" but I want it "on"). For this you can use the macro %USEPGP in your template, perhaps along with %SIG

Re: PGP/MIME

Hello Robert Golovniov, 28-Jul-2004 11:13, you wrote: > Can anybody share with me his success story of reading PGP/MIME signed > and encrypted messages? What is your problem with it? My constant annoyance is that apparently there's no way to tell TB to ALWAYS use PGP/MIME (the switch defaults t

Re: PGP-MIME

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi B, on Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:03:58 -0400GMT, you wrote: BRiaNS> Every time i make a new message, i check the tab "Privacy" and see BRiaNS> PGP/MIME and is checked in "auto" , by default. BRiaNS> how i disable that thing? In account properties » opt

Re: PGP/MIME auto

Hello Marck, On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:50:34 +0100 your time, you said: MDP> This is obsolete and you should use the built-in support for that PGP MDP> version. Duly noted! MDP> It is, although the macro remedy you mention below is the correct MDP> method to use, however: OK. But when

Re: PGP/MIME auto

Hi Simon, @22-Oct-2003, 08:53 Simon B said: > When signing messages with PGP 6.58ckt (external plugin) This is obsolete and you should use the built-in support for that PGP version. > ... To change this behaviour you have to switch it OFF...for > _every_ email, which seems a bit ridiculo

Re: PGP/MIME auto

Hello Lourdes, On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:10:40 -0500 your time, you said: LJ> ...Have you tried using the built in support for PGP 5,6,7,8 rather than LJ> the external plugin? Yes, I did try using the built in support as well, but ecountered the same problems unfortunately. -- Slán, Simon @ i

Re: PGP/MIME auto

Hello Simon, Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 2:53:23 AM, you wrote: > When signing messages with PGP 6.58ckt (external plugin) in The Bat! > Ver.2.01.3 the messages get stuck in the outbox and TB! then generates lots > of errors. The errors seem to occur only when PGP/MIME is on auto, which

Re: PGP/MIME encrypting problem

Hi Melissa, on Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:25:41 -0700GMT (21.10.03, 08:25 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MR> I seem to be able to sign messages using PGP/MIME (we'll see if this MR> message turns out okay in that regard), but I seem quite unable to MR> encrypt any message using PGP

Re: PGP/MIME encrypting problem

Hello Melissa, Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 2:25:41 AM, you wrote: > I seem to be able to sign messages using PGP/MIME (we'll see if this > message turns out okay in that regard), Signature is fine here! > but I seem quite unable to > encrypt any message using PGP/MIME. When I try to select the

Re: PGP/Mime and extra line feed on TBOT

Hello Andrew! On Thursday, September 25, 2003, 1:55 AM, you wrote: MB>> ... I get a double-spaced post on TBOT. ... A> Yes, I had the same problem also. I used the following "%NOPGPMime" A> in my Yahoo list templates, which solved the problem - I still sign A> messages but the messages d

Re: PGP/Mime and extra line feed on TBOT

Hello Mary, Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 9:07:32 PM, you wrote: MB> When I don't do both of these things, I get a double-spaced post on MB> TBOT. I know, it is an old Yahoo! problem, and PGP/Mime may not always MB> be the cause. But it seems to be, in my case. No post of mine was ever MB> doubl

Re: PGP/Mime and extra line feed on TBOT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, On 24 September 2003, 22:00 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MB>>> Is there an expression like %NOUSEPGP ... MW>> Add the following to your folder template: MW>> %NOPGPMIME% MW>> %NOSIGNCOMPLETE%- MDP> Hold it

Re: PGP/Mime and extra line feed on TBOT

Hello Martin! On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 3:47 PM, you wrote: MB>> Is there an expression like %NOUSEPGP that I can put into the address MB>> book for TBOT such that I won't have to turn PGP/Mime off in the MB>> Privacy menu of the Edit Mail Message window and, in addition, uncheck MB>> the

Re: PGP/Mime and extra line feed on TBOT

Hi Martin, @24-Sep-2003, 21:47 Martin Webster [MW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Mary: MB>> Is there an expression like %NOUSEPGP ... MW> Add the following to your folder template: MW> %NOPGPMIME% MW> %NOSIGNCOMPLETE%- Hold it - either %NOUSEPGP or %NOSIGNCOMPLETE is enough. %NOPGPMIME is

Re: PGP/Mime and extra line feed on TBOT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mary, On 24 September 2003, 15:07 -0500 (21:07 local time) Mary Bull [MB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MB> Is there an expression like %NOUSEPGP that I can put into the address MB> book for TBOT such that I won't have to turn PGP/Mime off in

Re: PGP-MIME signatures

Hi Peter, @3-Sep-2003, 22:22 +0200 (21:22 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Paul: PM> However, I wouldn't advise it for this list, because AFAIK it PM> doesn't accept attachments, ... We do allow MIME signatures here now, since this is an official support list and we are

Re: PGP-MIME signatures (was:Re[3]: message.att file attachmentwith The Bat! v2.0 issue)

Hello Paul, Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 2:04:43 PM, you wrote: PH> I'm clueless as to how I enable PGP-MIME signatures. Googling PH> didn't help nor could I find in the TBUDL archives. Is it possible PH> with GnuGP? I do this in each of my "moderated" replies in the QT. %USEPGP%PGPMIME%SIGNCOM

Re: PGP-MIME signatures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, on Wed, 3 Sep 2003 21:04:43 +0100GMT (03.09.03, 22:04 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PH> I'm clueless as to how I enable PGP-MIME signatures. Googling didn't help nor PH> could I find in the TBUDL archives. Is it poss

Re: PGP/MIME

Hello Eddie! On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 at 7:47:17 PM you wrote: > Thanks Dierk. Do you know if it in the pipe for v2? Not sure. It is high on the wish list, though. -- Dierk Haasis The Bat 1.62/Beta16 on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1 In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. (Napo

Re: PGP/MIME

Hello Eddie! On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 at 2:19:23 PM you wrote: >- is this normal? Yes, that's actually the point of MIME. >- what is PGP/MIME? A standard used by some mailers (i.e. Eudora) to sign and encrypt a message (and its attachments), and then not showing it inline but as

Re: PGP/MIME

Hello Damian, On Wednesday, July 10, 2002 at 10:45:05 -0400, you wrote concerning 'PGP/MIME': ... I got a bad signature from your PGP-signed message: ***[11/07/02 1:32:54] PGP Signature Status: bad ***[11/07/02 1:32:54] Hash: RIPEMD160 ***[11/07/02 1:32:54] Signer: Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: PGP/MIME

Spake Dierk Haasis on 7/10/2002, at 19:17:07 +0200: > Sorry, you are mixing something up. PGP and OpenPGP do (more or less) > exactly the same. PGP/MIME is a standard for sending messages and > attachments decrypted. Ummm... yep, that' exactly what I'm asking about. As far as I can tell, the Op

Re: PGP/MIME

Hello Damian! On Wednesday, July 10, 2002 at 4:45:05 PM you wrote: > The main difference I see between OpenPGP and PGP/MIME is that the PGP > signatures are attached as .ATT attachments, and the following is specified > in the headers: Sorry, you are mixing something up. PGP and OpenPGP do (mor

Re: PGP/MIME supported?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On November 2, 2000, at 3:15:23 AM, Marek Mikus Wrote: MM> Max working now on S/MIME options and SSL encryption. He told me, then MM> will be possible to implement PGP/MIME. But I don't know when, because MM> Max want to implement right OpenPGP stand

Re: PGP/MIME supported?

Hi there Marek, Going back 13:12 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts: > Not yet, wait. We have too many wishes, too many requests and 2 > programmers only. :-)) ;)) Allright! Cheers, Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Die Zukunft wird wegen Mangel

Re: PGP/MIME supported?

Hi there Marek, Going back 12:15 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts: > Max working now on S/MIME options and SSL encryption. He told me, then > will be possible to implement PGP/MIME. But I don't know when, because > Max want to implement right OpenPGP standard :-)) I see :) On

Re: PGP/MIME supported?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Johannes, On 02 November 2000 at 11:48:02 GMT +0100 (which was 10:48 where I live) Johannes M. Posel wrote and made these points: JMP> Do you happen to know if TB 1.47 (Halloween Edition) supports JMP> PGP/Mime? Not yet. - -- Cheers, .\\arck _

Re: PGP/MIME supported?

Hi there Christian, Going back 11:58 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts: > PGP/MIME is not supported by TB at the moment. Thus, do not set this > option. *sad* :( > HTH Cheers, Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- A consultant is a person who borr

Re: PGP/MIME supported?

Johannes M. Posel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you happen to know if TB 1.47 (Halloween Edition) supports > PGP/Mime? I'm using PGP 6.58, and set in the PGP-Preferences to use > PGP/Mime. Did I forget something? It doesnt seem to work :/ Thanks > for any tips! PGP/MIME is not supported by TB