Re[2]: Clarification requested on list reply headers

2002-03-27 Thread Dave Gorman
Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 4:00:54 PM, Dwight wrote: > On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 11:22:39 AM, Chris Lilley wrote: > I guess I'm lost on this one, but I'm on several yahoo groups, > and am probably over active on several, and I've never had any > problems with the way that replying works. >

Re[2]: Clarification requested on list reply headers

2002-03-27 Thread Chris Lilley
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 8:54:24 AM, Dierk wrote: DH> Hello Marck! DH> On Wednesday, March 27, 2002 at 3:39:25 AM you wrote: >> As to whether or not it messes up replying to these old-school lists, >> I've always found that a carefully crafted set of folder templates >> gets round the prob

Re[2]: Clarification requested on list reply headers

2002-03-26 Thread Chris Lilley
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 3:39:25 AM, Marck wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi Chris, MDP> @26 March 2002, 18:34:09 +0100 (17:34 UK time) Chris Lilley wrote in MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP> Just to clarify one more thing... >> In

Re[2]: Clarification requested on list reply headers

2002-03-26 Thread Chris Lilley
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 12:39:07 AM, Marck wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi Chris, MDP> @26 March 2002, 18:34:09 +0100 (17:34 UK time) Chris Lilley wrote in MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> I have noticed a change in behavior since