Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant

Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 2:21:07 PM, was when, Thomas typed the following: TF> Hello Miles, TF> On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:21:13 -0400 GMT (24/09/2001, 02:21 +0800 GMT), TF> Miles Alexander wrote: MA>> I will add this to my collection of quotes! TF> Cool.

Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant

Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 12:17:37 PM, was when, Thomas typed the following: TF> Hello Miles, TF> On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:07:39 -0400 GMT (23/09/2001, 23:07 +0800 GMT), TF> Miles Alexander wrote: "Drugs may lead to nowhere, but at least it's the scenic ro

Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant

Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 12:23:21 PM, was when, Thomas typed the following: TF> No, this won't work. The Selective Download Filter downloads all TF> message headers and then processes only these. The signal string must TF> be matched exactly *in the head

Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant

Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 10:42:19 AM, was when, Thomas typed the following: Selective downloads: Yes: this seems to be a very good way to resolve the situation but do I need to imply (within the window) the following format?: String: [Person One], Loca

Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant

Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 10:42:19 AM, was when, Thomas typed the following: Thomas, So, what you are telling me is that the Incoming filters are processed in a hierarchy and putting my *else* filter at the bottom of that list (thus the Move Up and Move D

Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant

Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 1:58:21 AM, was when, Thomas typed the following: TF> Hello Miles, TF> On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:27:27 -0400 GMT (23/09/2001, 10:27 +0800 GMT), TF> Miles Alexander wrote: MA>> If an incoming transaction does not match *any*