Re[2]: OT [ Message list and attachments]

Hello Richard, Monday, November 4, 2002, 3:39:10 AM, you wrote: RW Ye gods, where (or in which message) was that because I can't see it RW here? My sig is all in English - I can't speak German - and I've RW checked my posting in this thread (I presume it's where you are talking RW about) and

Re[2]: OT [ Message list and attachments]

Hello Richard, Monday, November 4, 2002, 10:14:30 AM, you wrote: MB Are you subscribed [to tbot]? It's an interesting list. RW Well I wasn't and still am not. Joined Yahoo but kept getting asked RW for password umpteen times so gave up in disgust :-( Oh, I hate that part of it too, Haven't

Re[2]: OT [ Message list and attachments]

Hello Thomas, More than slightly Off Topic reply here, to you: Sunday, November 3, 2002, 11:30:24 PM, you wrote: TF Hello Richard, And then you appended this sig: Warum hatte Bach so viele Kinder, Kant jedoch kein einziges? - Weil Bach sich auf die Kunst der Fuge verstand, waehrend Kant nur