-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello danger.
- --On 24 May 2005 12:20 -0400 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
> Works fine here too back at you PGP9
*** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION ***
*** Status: Good Signature
*** Signer: danger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Roelof,
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 11:59:13 AM, you wrote:
RO> Hallo Tony,
RO> On Tue, 24 May 2005 16:47:28 +0100GMT (24-5-2005, 17:47 +0200, where I
RO> live), you wrote:
TB>> I'm working on that too but I've a feeling it an idiosyncrasy of the
Hello Manuel.
--On 23 May 2005 20:03 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
> I am, Tony, I am. Just wanted to confirm Alex' question.
> I know that Mulberry gets the wrong information from your server whereas
> TB! doesn't fetch the information from the server
Hello Manuel.
--On 23 May 2005 20:00 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
> Me is not Alex, but unfortunatelly your message has *no* references at
> all. Therefore it can't be threading in any way.
Don't you start, I thought you was on my side :)
--
Ton
Hi Tony,
--<> 23.05.2005 18:56 +0100:
Threading seems okay.
Your not listening to me are you?
I am, Tony, I am. Just wanted to confirm Alex' question.
I know that Mulberry gets the wrong information from your server whereas
TB! doesn't fetch the information from the server and does ever
Hi Tony,
--<> 23.05.2005 18:52 +0100:
Tell me Alex, does this one thread properly? If I'm right, I suspect it
will and I#ve not doctored the headers in anyway.
Me is not Alex, but unfortunatelly your message has *no* references at all.
Therefore it can't be threading in any way.
--
Manue
Hello Manuel.
--On 23 May 2005 19:04 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
> Threading seems okay.
Your not listening to me are you?
--
Tony.
M.
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.sil
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 18:53 +0200 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
> Sorry to hijack this thread, I just had to place a reply "somewhere" using
> the IMAP account I just created. I'm a 1&1 customer just like Tony, and I
> just created an IMA
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 18:53 +0200 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
> I'm a 1&1 customer just like Tony, and I just created an IMAP account in
> TB to access my mails & see if they thread or not
Like I said, they will. The Bat! doesn't yet handle IM
Hello Tony Boom & everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 19:07 you (Tony Boom) wrote:
>> Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
> No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by
> my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you?
The
Hi Alexander,
--<> 23.05.2005 18:53 +0200:
I just created an IMAP account in TB
Nice middle name. ;)
Threading seems okay.
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones
Hello Martin Webster on tbudl & everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 18:46 you (Martin Webster on tbudl) wrote:
>> .. and here I was liking it, since my domain name isn't included in the
>> message id. :(
> Do these IP-based message IDs work with *cough* mU1b3rry?
> :-)
Sorry to hijack this thread,
12 matches
Mail list logo
