Hi Stuart,
On Thursday, 16 November, 2006 at 7:32:13 PM you wrote:
MM>> While attempting to re-map the Ctrl+Enter I somehow
MM>> changed the size of the glyphs on the toolbar. Don't ask, I don't know
MM>> how.
> When you go into customize and select the "Standard" container on the
> left, you
>>In 2.01 version will be possible to selecect HTML as default in
>>Preferences and AFAIK macros for selecting message type are planned.
CaC> Thank you for this info.
When I first installed TB as an eval (v2.00) I was completely unable to send (or
queue) any email if composed with HTML option.
It seems that Dave Kennedy said ...
D> That's kind of a simple-minded view. Presentation counts. There
D> have been a few snipes recently about how FoxMail does a lousy
D> job at wrapping lines, etc. That's presentation and it clearly
D> matters to even us plain-text techy types.
That's because I
Spike-
Monday, February 24, 2003, 7:20:26 PM, you wrote:
S> See above, as it only grabs the whole link if you select copy LINK. It
S> won't paste properly in ANY application I could find to try it in.
I pasted it into my text editor of choice, Edit Plus, without any
problem. I deleted the orig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On 15 January 2002 at 11:34:35 -0500 (which was 16:34 where I live)
Jan Rifkinson wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points:
Marck>> [...] I am forced to pronounce it dead. [/...] Please take it
Marck>> off-list or to TBOT.
> Sorr
Hello Marck.
At 11:03 AM on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 you wrote the
following about [DEAD HORSE (was [OT sort of] PocoMail-
was Re[4]: HTML based emails)]
Marck> [...] I am forced to pronounce it dead. [/...]
Marck> Please take it off-list or to TBOT.
Sorry, Mark. I actually thought
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On 15 January 2002 at 10:45:52 -0500 (which was 15:45 where I live)
Jan Rifkinson wrote to Dierk Haasis and made these points:
> ... but I always welcome comic relief.
> :-)
This topic has gone way "off" and I am forced to pronounce i
Hello Dierk.
At 3:31 AM on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 you wrote the
following in response to my comments [[OT sort of]
PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails]
>> I'd take a Porsche over a Mercedes any day.
Dierk> Well, both are German luxury cars ... which
Dierk> means most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On 15 January 2002 at 09:09:18 +0100 (which was 08:09 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote to Ray Vermey and made these points:
> Did I get your point, your irony?
This topic has gone way "off" and I am forced to pronounce it dead.
Please t
Hello Ray!
On 14 Jan 2002 at 10:32:18 pm you wrote:
> I could go on for a while but till now i realy like the
> slickinterface of PocoMail a lot better than the Bat and also
> itsHTML-possibility.
>
> The Bat in my eyes is developping towards a more and more
> hightechmailer (I am an Unix "g
Hello Ray!
On 14 Jan 2002 at 11:19:43 pm you wrote:
> I just like to see HTML and every now and then write html.
"Every now and then"? Shouldn't HTML messages only be used if
necessary? I mean, you send a pure plain text message as HTML - just
to annoy us?
Or are you trying to make a point lik
On 15 January 2002 at 8:31 am Dierk wrote:
> Well, both are German luxury cars ... which means most Germans like
> them, virtually every non-German, and me not.
> I'd rather have a good British (they are mostly half American today),
> Italian or French car. Even the Spanish version of German car
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 12:20:27 AM PST, Dierk Haasis wrote:
> Why, o why ... again a superfluous HTML mail with bad wrapping ...
Give them an inch, and they take up the whole road... :-(
It really is a dangerous line to cross. People al
Hello Kenneth!
On 14 Jan 2002 at 11:52:16 pm you wrote:
> To each his/her own.
Oh, yes ...
> There is an option for word wrapping in Pocomail, and you don't have to keep it on
>if you don't like it.
Why, o why ... again a superfluous HTML mail with bad wrapping ...
This thread begins to con
Hello Jan!
On 15 Jan 2002 at 3:20:20 am you wrote:
> I'd take a Porsche over a Mercedes any day.
Well, both are German luxury cars ... which means most Germans like
them, virtually every non-German, and me not.
I'd rather have a good British (they are mostly half American today),
Italian or
On 14 January 2002 at 23:09 Melissa wrote:
> Personally, I think Slaven is great. I know he's dedicated to making
> Pocomail better, and no doubt it will improve. His tireless
> programming efforts and dedication to customer support (and openness
> to and implementation of suggestions) are much a
On 1/14/2002 at 1:32 PM, Ray Vermey wrote:
> 3) Multiple accounts are much easier under the Bat, in Poco you
> haveto log in and out of the different accounts
But each account suports multiple servers and identities.
> 9) Filtering is also very easy
Pocomail's filters don't compare to TB. Poco
On 1/14/2002 at 3:09 PM, Melissa Reese wrote:
> In spite of what I see as some very serious shortcomings, I do in fact
> really like Pocomail. Certainly - if Slaven were to get together with
> the programmers of TB!, there could be some *very interesting*
> developments! :-)
Pocobat?
--
Regar
Hello Ray.
At 4:32 PM on Monday, January 14, 2002 you wrote the
following about [[OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML
based emails]
Ray> [...] Well i will playing around for some time
Ray> with Pocomail and see howthings develop. But going
Ray> back to the Bat is like stepping in a
At 6:09:11 pm on 1/14/2002, you wrote:
> In spite of what I see as some very serious shortcomings, I do in fact
> really like Pocomail. Certainly - if Slaven were to get together with
> the programmers of TB!, there could be some *very interesting*
> developments! :-)
I think, for the most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 1:32:18 PM PST, Ray Vermey wrote:
>>RR> On Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote:
>>
>>
>>G>> PocoMail. In some ways, it's less powerful than The Bat, but
>>nobody works harder than PocoMail's
>>G>> a
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:48:24 +0100, David van Zuijlekom wrote:
>I can say one thing about Pocomail: the wrapping sucks!
>
>Look at your reply you gave to Nick. It looks a lot like the most
>irritating wrapping like in OL/OE. ;-(
To each his/her own.
However, let's try to be objective here.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Kenneth,
On 14 Jan 2002 at 13:46:28 -0500, Kenneth S. Rhee [KSR] wrote
concerning ': HTML based emails':
...
>>Being the curious type, I tried it but right from the start I
>>couldn't
>>even set up hierarchical folders so that pretty much did i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 15 January 2002 at 11:19 a.m. Ray wrote:
RV> If the Bat was to be integrated with Poco... whohah THAT would
RV> be some car with some engine ;-)
RV> Vrommm ;-)
Ray,
*That* I can agree with! :-)
Carren
PGP pu
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:19:43 +0100, Ray Vermey wrote:
>If the Bat was to be integrated with Poco... whohah THAT would
>be some car with some engine ;-)
>
>Vrommm ;-)
If you take the best part of the BAT (the latest beta) and best of
PocoMail (the latest beta), and come up with th
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:57:19 +1300, Carren Stuart wrote:
/SNIP/
Well Caren, email clients are just a matter of personal taste, we can agree on that one ;-)
I just like to see HTML and every now and then write html.
Sure the Bat is a great one and i use it for almost 3 years now as a registered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 15 January 2002 at 10:32 a.m. Ray wrote:
RV> Well i use Poco for one day now and here are some of my findings:
RV> I could go on for a while but till now i realy like the
RV> slickinterface of PocoMail a lot better than the Bat and
Hi Ray,
On 14 Jan 2002 at 22:32:18 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
> 5) I like the HTML-editor of Poco.
Yes, and you showed us how much you liked it by sending a HTML formatted
message.
Really useful! :-\
--
Regards,
Lars
The Bat! 1.54 Beta/28 on Windows NT 5.1 Build 2600
_
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:18:00 +0100, Luc wrote:
>RR> On Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote:
>
>
>G>> PocoMail. In some ways, it's less powerful than The Bat, but
>nobody works harder than PocoMail's
>G>> author at accomodating user requests in the mail client. HTML is
>nothin
It was foretold that on 14-1-2002 @ 22:20:39 GMT-0500 (which was 4:20
where I live) Rick Reumann wrote and spread these wise comments on
"[OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails":
RR> On Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote:
G>> "on the
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:23:59 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
>Being the curious type, I tried it but right from the start I
>couldn't
>even set up hierarchical folders so that pretty much did it for me.
>If
>there is a way I couldn't find it...
You can set up the subfolders. I believe you have to do
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:37:02 +, Alastair Scott wrote:
>Well, I had a look at Poco and it turned me right off straight away
>(as Pegasus and Eudora do). I'm a user interface designer - and
>sensitive to such things - and I'd rather have an "old-fashioned"
>interface like TB's rather than one wh
On 14 January 2002 at 03:20 Rick wrote:
>I'm just curious if anyone could give
>me some of the benefits/drawbacks of using PocoMail vs The Bat! I'm
>a registered user of The Bat! that came from Pegasus so I'm just
>curious what some users of it think of it compared to The Bat!. If
Hello Rick Reumann,
On Sunday, January 13 2002 at 07:20 PM PDT, you wrote:
> I'm just curious if anyone could give me some of the benefits/drawbacks
> of using PocoMail vs The Bat!
Being the curious type, I tried it but right from the start I couldn't
even set up hierarchical folders so that
Hello Melissa,
14 Jan 2002, 5:22:02, you wrote:
MR> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MR> Hash: SHA1
MR> On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 7:48:08 PM PST, GeekMaster wrote:
>> Anyway, give it a look. I want to say, like you, I am a registered
>> user of The Bat, and as I said, I really do think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 7:48:08 PM PST, GeekMaster wrote:
> Anyway, give it a look. I want to say, like you, I am a registered
> user of The Bat, and as I said, I really do think it's among the
> very best apps out there. But, being the fanat
Rick Reumann wrote:
>I'm just curious if anyone could give
> me some of the benefits/drawbacks of using PocoMail vs The Bat!
>
Hi Rick.
As you mention in your message, this might not be the best place for a
blow-by-blow comparison, but certainly trying it is the best way to get
a feel fo
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote:
G> "on the fly" inline HTML message rendering. At this moment, I'm composing this
from Opera 6's e-mail
G> client, because being integrated into the browser, it's so very convenient.
Generally though, I use
G> PocoMail. In some wa
On 11/30/2001, Kenneth S. Rhee wrote:
> Besides, with the broadband connection, most people don't suffer
> from bandwidth limitation of 56K modems.
More than 80% of the U.S. is still using dialup to access the
Internet, though. Source:
http://adsections.businessweek.com/broadband/future/bbtwo.h
Hi Abigail
> If there is to be a change in future releases of TB, PLEASE allow this
> to be an option, with the DEFAULT setting being to not download
> images.
>
> This is just my preference, but for me it is a main reason that I
> switched to TB - I don't have a fast connection, and TB's automat
--
On Monday, January 08, 2001, 3:17:22 PM, Austin Dennis wrote:
AD> Hi Kent
>> I would just like a HTML message to display all of the images :>
AD> Me too. :)
Not me!
If there is to be a change in future releases of TB, PLEASE allow this
to be an option, with
Hello dMb,
On GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 31, 2000, 5:04:18 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
dMb wrote:
> Therefore, I thought of doing an HTML message with the pictures
> included, except that I'm back to where I started.
Do it in pagemaker??
Asuming they can see the result?
>
42 matches
Mail list logo
