Hi Britta,
> in which Scot takes another close look at TheBat.
Yes, he took that "close look" two years ago. He says so in his
article.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.53d
**
Scanned by Mail
Hi,
I just read the latest SFNL:
http://www.scotfinnie.com/newsletter/22.htm
in which Scot takes another close look at TheBat. I don't know enough
about the features or workings of TB to be able to answer his
questions or point him in the right direction. Maybe the features he
neeeds are already
Did you copy him with this note? I would be curious to his response
if you did.
March 08, 2002, 17:04:50, you wrote:
> He has two major issues, in both of which he has missed the point of
> what TB can really do.
Gee, Scot seems very hung up on a feature I don't understand why I
really need. He seems very fixated on the one feature very few may
need.I have multiple accounts, forwards etc and never missed what
Scot think's is so important.
Dave in Phoenix
www.libchrist.com
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TB User Discussion list,
On 08 March 2002 at 10:40:07 +1300 (which was 21:40 where I live)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I just read the latest SFNL:
> http://www.scotfinnie.com/newsletter/22.htm in which S
Hello James
Thank you for your email dated Sunday, March 03, 2002, 4:18:25 PM, in which you wrote:
JS> I'd say send him an invitation to sit in on this list for a week or two.
Done!
--
Regards
William
PGP spoken here - email me for my Public Key
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flying with The Bat! 1
Hello all,
Sunday, March 3, 2002, Leif Gregory wrote:
LG> As a reviewer of software for my newsletter, since 1997, he made a big
LG> mistake in writing that article without checking all the facts. He
LG> explicitly states that:
LG>I first tested The Bat! perhaps two years ago, and I haven't
On 02 March 2002 at 22:23 William wrote:
> Hello TBUDL
> In Scot's current newsletter (on-line version at
> http://www.scotfinnie.com/newsletter/22.htm
> he compares TB! unfavourably with Eudora! He welcomes contrary views.
> Would any of our resident experts like to put him right?
Well
Hello Bambang!
On Sunday, March 3, 2002 at 8:43:12 PM you wrote:
> The other 2 things I miss from Pegasus is the ability to put custom
> header fields and annotation of the message.The first one is very useful for such
>thing like Mail to News
> gateway.
annotations? Easy, ever used the "Memo"
Bonjour,
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 02:43:12 +0700, Bambang P wrote:
BP> I just found that when replying/sending we can choose which account to
BP> send from _without_ create a group account by checking View->From in
BP> the Edit Mail Message window.
You can also do this by rigth clicking on the na
Hi Joseph,
On Sunday, March 03, 2002, 1:59:16 PM, Joseph N. wrote:
> In TB!, a user can create totally different personalities, different
> in all settings, and still sort mail from one account to the other's
> folders, and also choose, when replying or sending, which account to
> send from. Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello William,
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, at 13:02:51 [GMT +] (which was 8:02:51
AM in NY, USA) William Moore wrote:
William Moore> Thank you for your email dated Sunday, March 03, 2002, 11:29:27 AM, in
which you wrote:
MAU>> Scot's article is anything but an i
Hello Miguel
Thank you for your email dated Sunday, March 03, 2002, 11:29:27 AM, in which you wrote:
MAU> Scot's article is anything but an independent review
I must admit it is unlike him to talk about a two-year old product
although he says he will review it in the near future.
I was one of
Hi Miguel, and others
Sunday, March 3, 2002, 11:29:27 AM, you wrote:
Miguel A. Urech> And then he goes on with his "comparison", all
that he is proving to me Miguel A. Urech> is that his is _not_ a
professional as he is comparing oranges to scuba Miguel A. Urech>
diving
Absolutely (me too!)
Af
Hi William,
> he compares TB! unfavourably with Eudora!
Scot's article is anything but an independent review. As Leif has
quoted in another message, if Scot writes:
> I first tested The Bat! perhaps two years ago, and I haven't looked
> at it since then. I like the feel of it better than many o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Leif,
On 03 March 2002 at 01:21:13 -0700 (which was 08:21 where I live) Leif
Gregory wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Two years ago was what... v1.38, 1.39 or so?
FYI: 1.39 with 1.41 in beta. ;-)
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List mod
Hello Philippe,
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 at 07:14:16 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
PG> #2: Filters
PG> He writes :
PG>"Eudora lets me filter *outbound* messages. You can't do
PG>that in Outlook or Outlook Express. Last time I checked
PG>you couldn't do it in The Bat! or Pega
Bonjour,
Sun, 3 Mar 2002 00:59:16 -0600, Joseph N. wrote:
JN> If I understand you correctly, I disagree.
Indeed I've been unclear.
The root organisation of TB! is based on Accounts wile Eudora is
organized on folders. No solution is perfect and it's possible
with TB
If I understand you correctly, I disagree.
In TB!, a user can create totally different personalities, different
in all settings, and still sort mail from one account to the other's
folders, and also choose, when replying or sending, which account to
send from. The key to all of that is first to
Bonjour,
Sat, 2 Mar 2002 22:23:15 +, William Moore wrote:
WM> In Scot's current newsletter (on-line version at
WM> http://www.scotfinnie.com/newsletter/22.htm
WM> he compares TB! unfavourably with Eudora! He welcomes contrary views.
WM> Would any of our resident experts like to put
Hello TBUDL
In Scot's current newsletter (on-line version at
http://www.scotfinnie.com/newsletter/22.htm
he compares TB! unfavourably with Eudora! He welcomes contrary views.
Would any of our resident experts like to put him right?
--
Regards
William
PGP spoken here - email me for m
21 matches
Mail list logo
