Re[2]: Should other mailers be permitted?

Hello Ken M. Isbell, On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:58:20 -0300 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 11:58:20 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Ken M. Isbell wrote: KMI By the same token, I'll not be making disparaging remarks about KMI other mailers. When I buy a car, I

Re[3]: Should other mailers be permitted?

Hello Jamie Dainton, On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:23:55 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 08:23:55 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Jamie Dainton wrote: JD bugs and Rev Bob. Sorry I meant M$ Bob. I typed it without thinking. -- Jamie Dainton

Re: Should other mailers be permitted?

Hello Jamie Dainton, On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 08:12:25 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 2:12:25 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Jamie Dainton wrote: Hello Ken M. Isbell, On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 08:59:55 -0300 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, September 26, 2000,

Should other mailers be permitted?

Hello Ken M. Isbell, On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 08:59:55 -0300 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 12:59:55 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Ken M. Isbell wrote: KMI I don't think it's only for The Bat users, I think it's for anyone who KMI would like information about

Re: Should other mailers be permitted?

Hello Ken M. Isbell, Hello yourself, I think use of another mailer is a non-issue and doesn't merit further discussion. I use it because I know it and like it. I'm studying The Bat and learning about it, from my own mistakes and from those, self- confessed, of the list