Re: Someone spamming us

2000-09-03 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello John, Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 1:34:18 PM, you wrote: JS> Someone with access to the TBUDL and TBBETA membership lists (using JS> the From: address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, passing through a relay which JS> claims to be cyberpass.net) seems to believe I might be interested in JS> buyin

Re[2]: Someone spamming us

2000-09-01 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck D. Pearlstone ! On Fri, 1 Sep 2000 17:11:23 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 01.09.2000, 18:11 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: GE>> We now know that this could be done. Shouldn't our signatures be GE>> stripped off when msg is t

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-09-01 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gerd, On 01 September 2000 at 15:13:44 GMT +0200 (which was 14:13 where I live) Gerd Ewald wrote and made these points on the subject of "Someone spamming us": MDP>> Strike that theory then. We're back to someone joinin

Re[2]: Someone spamming us

2000-09-01 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck D. Pearlstone ! On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:28:17 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 31.08.2000, 20:28 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: MDP> Strike that theory then. We're back to someone joining the list MDP> long-hand just to h

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-31 Thread John Sullivan
On Thursday 31 August 2000 Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: GE>> But what, if that person just harvests our adress out of our GE>> PGP-sigantures ? > I'm not going to do the research myself but I must say that this seems > to be the most likely source for the harvest that was done. With a PGP > SDK a

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-31 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tom, On 31 August 2000 at 10:48:51 GMT -0700 (which was 18:48 where I live) Tom Plunket wrote and made these points on the subject of "Someone spamming us": GE>> But what, if that person just harvests our adress out

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-31 Thread tracer
Hello ztrader, On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:50:18 -0700 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, August 31, 2000, 7:50:18 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, ztrader wrote: (snip) MDP>> I *have* received this spam. Only one copy, and I am active on both MDP>> lists. > Hmmm... another beta lister that got

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-31 Thread Tom Plunket
GE> But what, if that person just harvests our adress out of our PGP-sigantures ? I got one copy of the message, no PGP here. Only on TBUDL. -tom! -- Bah, ridiculous thing. -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutai

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-31 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gerd, On 31 August 2000 at 18:39:01 GMT +0200 (which was 17:39 where I live) Gerd Ewald wrote and made these points on the subject of "Someone spamming us": MDP>> Messages in the archive show the address of the archive its

Re[2]: Someone spamming us

2000-08-31 Thread Gerd Ewald
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone ! On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 01:27:51 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 31.08.2000, 02:27 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: MDP> Messages in the archive show the address of the archive itself - that MDP> to which the archive (which is actually a normal list member) me

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-31 Thread Peter Steiner
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 08:00:01 +0200, Gerd Ewald wrote: >> MDP> I *have* received this spam. Only one copy, and I am active on both >> MDP> lists. >> >> Hmmm... another beta lister that got the spam. The plot thickens. Did >> anyone NOT on the beta list get it? GE> Yep ! I'm only in TBUDL ! Th

Re: Re[2]: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread Gerd Ewald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 31.08.00: > > MDP> I *have* received this spam. Only one copy, and I am active on both > MDP> lists. > > Hmmm... another beta lister that got the spam. The plot thickens. Did > anyone NOT on the beta list get it? Yep ! I'm only in TBUDL ! The mail adress I use

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread Ming-Li
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 6:31:06 PM, ztrader wrote: > Any way to get rid of this? I just removed my mailto, but forgot > to look at the end :-). A nice idea, but does spread the address. It's not necessary to get rid of it. If you look at messages in the archive, the line at the bottom is:

Re[2]: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread ztrader
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 4:51:32 PM, you wrote: MDP> They are already being removed by the archive except where they appear MDP> in the body of the message - as yours does. It would be advisable for MDP> all subscribers to modify your default template to exclude that MDP> "mailto:xx

Re[2]: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread ztrader
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 5:27:51 PM, you wrote: MDP> Strange as that may seem, yes. It's supposed to make it clear to the MDP> recipient which address they have used to subscribe to the list so MDP> that when they want to leave they know which address to send the MDP> .UNSUB com

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 31 August 2000 at 17:06:59 GMT -0700 (which was 01:06 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points on the subject of "Someone spamming us": >> It would be advisable for all subscribers to modify your def

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread tracer
Hello ztrader, On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:09:12 -0700 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, August 31, 2000, 6:09:12 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, ztrader wrote: > On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 2:48:03 PM, you wrote: CM>> FWIW, I received two copies of this spam, as well ... presumably one CM>>

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread Nick Andriash
On August 30, 2000, at 4:51:32 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote: > It would be advisable for all subscribers to modify your default > template to exclude that "mailto:xxx" at the end for list posting for > that very reason. Marck, are you referring to a "MailTo:" that some people include in their s

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ztrader, On 31 August 2000 at 16:09:12 GMT -0700 (which was 00:09 where I live) ztrader wrote and made these points on the subject of "Someone spamming us": CM>> FWIW, I received two copies of this spam, as well ... pre

Re[2]: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread ztrader
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 2:48:03 PM, you wrote: CM> FWIW, I received two copies of this spam, as well ... presumably one CM> for each of my subscriptions (TBBETA and TBUDL). I have not received this spam (yet :-). Perhaps it is from the beta list? LG>> We'll check the subscribers list, bu

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000 at 4:25 PM or thereabouts, Leif Gregory wrote the following about Someone spamming us: JS>> Someone with access to the TBUDL and TBBETA membership lists JS>> (using the From: address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, passing JS>> through a

Re: Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello John, On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 at 13:34:18 [GMT +0100], you wrote: JS> Someone with access to the TBUDL and TBBETA membership lists JS> (using the From: address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, passing JS> through a relay which claims to be cyberpass.net) seems to believe JS> I might be interested in

Someone spamming us

2000-08-30 Thread John Sullivan
Someone with access to the TBUDL and TBBETA membership lists (using the From: address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, passing through a relay which claims to be cyberpass.net) seems to believe I might be interested in buying a CD packed full of what is clearly pirated commercial software, for $15. Ho h