Re[2]: The Bat ver 2.11.x and IMAP problems; TheBat vs T-Bird

2004-06-09 Thread SL
Hello Allie, Wednesday, June 9, 2004, 8:58:22 AM, you wrote: AM> Sl, [S] wrote: S>> On another matter...re ThunderBird vs The Bat!...tell me again S>> Allie (and others) what you see as the merits/demerits of both. snipola AM> I think my having to use ThunderBird has been misunderstood. AM> T

Re: The Bat ver 2.11.x and IMAP problems; TheBat vs T-Bird

2004-06-08 Thread Sean H .
Hello Allie, On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 5:58 PM, Allie Martin wrote: AM> Sl, [S] wrote: S>> On another matter...re ThunderBird vs The Bat!...tell me again S>> Allie (and others) what you see as the merits/demerits of both. An S>> obvious difference is TheBat does SO much more...(much of which may

Re: The Bat ver 2.11.x and IMAP problems; TheBat vs T-Bird

2004-06-08 Thread Allie Martin
Allie Martin, [AM] wrote: AM> There are some extensions currently available, but none that offer AM> any real functionality. Ooops! In all fairness, I forgot about the Enigmail/EnigMIME extension. This one was nice to use since you could autoPGP/MIME sign and also autoverify signed messages. I re

Re: The Bat ver 2.11.x and IMAP problems; TheBat vs T-Bird

2004-06-08 Thread Allie Martin
Sl, [S] wrote: S> On another matter...re ThunderBird vs The Bat!...tell me again S> Allie (and others) what you see as the merits/demerits of both. An S> obvious difference is TheBat does SO much more...(much of which may S> be superfluous to many users...eg like DVD players ...or cigarette S> lig

The Bat ver 2.11.x and IMAP problems; TheBat vs T-Bird

2004-06-08 Thread SL
Hi BatPersons Someone asked (sorry...can't find the original message) if there were more IMAP-related problems with TB with versions 2.1.x It may be coincidence, but I had no problems with TB 'till ver 2.11.x (as you can see I am now back to ver 2.10.x). I had database errors...which I was unable