Yes, I do this now with some of my accounts--I even use redirect
instead of move, though I can't remember where I read that
suggestion...
Tony
Jan Rifkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said at 9:39 AM on 6/15/2002:
I believe you can do that now. Just filter all incoming
mail from all your accounts
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, 17:18, utomo wrote:
I don't understand what you mean. I have at least 200 folders in
my main account and 235k messages. Why would I want to keep them
in a single folder?
I think 200 folder is not so common (mainly people will have less
than 20 Folders). Is that
Hello Allie!
On Sunday, June 16, 2002 at 4:00:24 AM you wrote:
Funny the discussions are not usually about how to actually use PGP
with TB!. They're usually about installing the plugin and how to use
PGP itself. The plug-in just works. There are some macros that you can
use to help with
utomo [u] wrote:
u I did not ask about common PGP tutorial, but PGP on the Bat
Have a look at http://www.pro-privacy.de/. There you can find the
english version of a very good tutorial about pgp and tb!
--
Gruß,
Matthias
All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi utomo,
@16 June 2002, 08:18:04 -0700 (16:18 UK time) utomo wrote in
000601c21549$07d10550$d1f192ca@microsoft">mid:000601c21549$07d10550$d1f192ca@microsoft
I think 200 folder is not so common (mainly people will have less than
20 Folders). Is
Hi,
I have some suggestion for the bat:
1. Reply to (mainly in mailing list) better if using the original
mailing list name, not the author name, sometime this can confuse
people. 2. Add option to use single folder for all email account.
3. Add NAV and McAfee virus checking plugin
4. Add more
Hello utomo,
u 1. Reply to (mainly in mailing list) better if using the original
u mailing list name, not the author name, sometime this can confuse
u people.
I really find this behaviour very annoying, and I get around this problem
with a reply macro like this:
%TO=%TO=listname [EMAIL
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, 5:10:03 AM, utomo wrote:
u 1. Reply to (mainly in mailing list) better if using the original
u mailing list name, not the author name, sometime this can confuse
u people. 2. Add option to use single folder for all email account.
Ah, I asked about this about a week ago
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi utomo,
@16 June 2002, 21:10:03 -0700 (05:10 UK time) utomo wrote in
000601c214eb$b49ad030$c8f192ca@microsoft">mid:000601c214eb$b49ad030$c8f192ca@microsoft
I have some suggestion for the bat:
1. Reply to (mainly in mailing list) better if using
Hi Luigi.
At 10:13 AM on Saturday, June 15, 2002 you wrote the
following about [The bat 1.60q suggestion]:
u 2. Add option to use single folder for all email account.
LR Would be GREAT.
I believe you can do that now. Just filter all incoming
mail from all your accounts to the one folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Deborah,
@15 June 2002, 15:17:31 +0100 Deborah W wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB will now use the email address name in the To: field rather
than the name of the person who wrote the post you're replying to :-)
And
Hey utomo,
My MUA believes you used Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
to write the following on Sunday, June 16, 2002 at 12:10:03 AM.
u Hi,
u I have some suggestion for the bat:
Ok, but this is a User discussion list, no guarentee that the authors
are reading... (they do sometimes though) I
Hello Marck,
2. Add option to use single folder for all email account.
MDP I don't understand what you mean. I have at least 200 folders in my
MDP main account and 235k messages. Why would I want to keep them in a
MDP single folder?
A single INBOX for every account in some cases is useful,
Hello Marck,
MDP Personally, I *like* to see who is addressing who within the list. I
MDP agree that leaving the name untouched is misleading, but the ... on
MDP (list) construct is vastly superior to either addressing method.
Yes, but this has a drawback in the lookup feature.
If I write an
On Saturday, June 15, 2002, 3:39:07 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP And the advantage of that when you are addressing an individual is ...?
I wouldn't use it for an email to an individual. On an email list, it
allows you sort a mailbox by which email list the item has been sent
to, or to
Hey Luigi,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal
to write the following on Saturday, June 15, 2002 at 10:55:52 AM.
LR A single INBOX for every account in some cases is useful,
LR expecially when you don't care about separating the inbox.
I don't do it for *every* account, but I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Luigi,
@15 June 2002, 16:57:32 +0200 (15:57 UK time) Luigi Rosa wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, but this has a drawback in the lookup feature.
Yes, but you've missed the point. The addition of on TBUDL negates
that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Luigi,
@15 June 2002, 16:55:52 +0200 (15:55 UK time) Luigi Rosa wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP I don't understand what you mean. I have at least 200 folders in my
MDP main account and 235k messages. Why would I want to
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The bat 1.60q suggestion
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, 5:10:03 AM, utomo wrote:
u 1. Reply to (mainly in mailing list) better if using the original
u mailing list name, not the author name, sometime
Hello Tim,
TM LR A single INBOX for every account in some cases is useful,
TM LR expecially when you don't care about separating the inbox.
TM I don't do it for *every* account, but I have 3-4 that I set up a
TM quick filter to move everything into one account's inbox.
Of course you can do it
Hello Marck!
On Saturday, June 15, 2002 at 4:36:19 PM you wrote:
I don't understand what you mean. I have at least 200 folders in my
main account and 235k messages. Why would I want to keep them in a
single folder?
Well, if he wants it, why not use a common folder to which every mail
of
-Original Message-
From: Dierk Haasis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 8:40 AM
To: Marck D Pearlstone
Subject: Re: The bat 1.60q suggestion
Hello Marck!
On Saturday, June 15, 2002 at 4:36:19 PM you wrote:
I don't understand what you mean. I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message 000601c21549$07d10550$d1f192ca@microsoft">mid:000601c21549$07d10550$d1f192ca@microsoft,
Utomo [U] wrote:
U Common folder is OK, but it means we must process it twice. First
U process it so all message go to common folder, after that
23 matches
Mail list logo
