hi,
Monday, March 13, 2006, 7:26:32 PM, you wrote:
open up any 3 sizeable windows, then select tile vertically
and tile horizontally from the taskbar's popup.
Yes but look what it does if more than three.
more than 3 will work differently, as the tile operation degenerates to the
split
Hi
On Tuesday 7 March 2006 at 12:38:27 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], vitalie vrabie wrote:
hi,
Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 1:57:34 AM, you wrote:
The splits are vertical when there are 3 columns.
That to me is a horizontal split: as you move from left to right
the screen is split.
open up
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:39:04 + GMT (06/03/2006, 03:39 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M Why anybody would want anything other than full-height account
M tree is beyond me. (-;
At home, I use a full-height account tree because I monitor about 12
accounts.
In Voyager, which I have set up
hi,
Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 1:57:34 AM, you wrote:
The splits are vertical when there are 3 columns.
That to me is a horizontal split: as you move from left to right
the screen is split.
open up any 3 sizeable windows, then select tile vertically and tile
horizontally from the taskbar's
vitalie,
On 07-03-2006 13:38, you [vv] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
vv in our case it's split instead of tile, but the horiz/vert
vv should remain consistent, don't you think?
Even a person from Ritlabs agrees with me :-)
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
MFPA,
On 05-03-2006 21:39, you [M] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
M Vertical split gives me three full-width panes, one above another.
M Horizontal spilt gives three full-height panes side by side.
To me, vertical means top to bottom.
The splits are vertical when there are 3 columns.
M Why
Hi
On Monday 6 March 2006 at 8:25:35 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Fjelsten wrote:
To me, vertical means top to bottom.
And to me, meaning that as you move from the top to the bottom the
screen is split into 3.
The splits are vertical when there are 3 columns.
That to me is a
On 5/3/2006 at 3:39:04 PM [GMT -0500], Mfpa wrote:
Why anybody would want anything other than full-height account
tree is beyond me. (-;
I don't use one. I use a full-width message list. I prefer when the
message list gets full width of the Window. My account tree doesn't need
all of the
MFPA,
On 07-03-2006 00:57, you [M] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
M I suspect neither of us will convince the other...
I think you may be right :-)
But if the wish is implemented, you could have a very high
preview pane doing away with scrolling is most instances.
M You mean a full-height
Hi
On Wednesday 1 March 2006 at 1:12:34 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Fjelsten wrote:
There is also this bug: Horizontal spilt is actually vertical split and
vice versa.
Not the case here using an earlier version of TB!.
Vertical split gives me three full-width panes, one above
Hello,
I have added this wish as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5722, if
You are interested, please support.
In Horizontal split will be very useful to see messages in two rows, where
From and date will be on first row, Subject on second. MS Outlook allows
this and user coming from this
Marek,
On 01-03-2006 14:04, you [MM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MM In Horizontal split will be very useful to see messages in two rows,
MM where From and date will be on first row, Subject on second. MS
MM Outlook allows this and user coming from this app asking me about
MM it.
I have had a
12 matches
Mail list logo
