Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Saturday, January 22, 2000 at 13:02:07 GMT +0800 (which was
22/01/2000 12:02 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
>>> Do I have to configure the ticker somewhere?
SL>> No, turn on message list in the view folder (remember, it isn't
SL>> view messa
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 13:02:07 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
SL>> No, turn on message list in the view folder (remember, it isn't view
SL>> message) window.
> Latest on this (and closing statement): I've found this virutal
> folder, I *love* it, and have no idea how I ever lived w
Hallo Steve et al,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:26:34 -0800 GMT (22.01.2000, 01:26 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Do I have to configure the ticker somewhere?
SL> No, turn on message list in the view folder (remember, it isn't view
SL> message) window.
Latest on this (and closing statement): I
Thursday, January 20, 2000, 7:51:44 PM, Thomas wrote:
> There was also a discussion about an adiitional flag, "seen" (as
> opposed ot new or read), with which messages could be marked that need
> relpies. I haven't heard whether this will be available in v2, but
> think not.
This is done some
Friday, January 21, 2000, 12:58:19 AM, tracer wrote:
> To me it seems to be a bug if replying to a msg DOESNT reset the
> incoming msg as read.,..
I don't. Who says I read it? Sounds dumb, but it is true in some cases.
For example, reply, "Hi, I'm busy, will get to this later..."
--
Friday, January 21, 2000, 7:56:50 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Do I have to configure the ticker somewhere?
No, turn on message list in the view folder (remember, it isn't view
message) window.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:23:46 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:23:46 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and by
Thomas> mistake to the list as well, my ap
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 23:56:50 GMT +0800 (which was 15:56 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TF> I tried again and failed. :-(. When I double-click on the ticker,
TF> one message will be shown as View Folder (full screen). With all
TF> headers ("kludges")
Hallo Allie,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:17:50 -0500 GMT (22.01.2000, 00:17 +0800 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM> Instead of sending yourself messages and tying up your mail server
AM> among other mishaps, you may generate some unread messages by going
AM> through a few folders, selecting a couple
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:38:30 + GMT (21.01.2000, 23:38 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and
TF>> by mistake to the list as well, my apologies to all!, but
TF>> my ticker is just a ticker. I don't hav
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:23:46 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and by
> mistake to the list as well, my apologies to all!, but my
> ticker is just a ticker. I don't have a virtual folder behind it. :-(
:)))
Instead of
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 22:23:46 GMT +0800 (which was 14:23 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TF> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and
TF> by mistake to the list as well, my apologies to all!, but
TF> my ticker is just a
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:20:14 + GMT (21.01.2000, 22:20 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> See my reply to tracer. The ticker is just a "silly window" (no
MDP> offence Max/Stef) which provides an access point to the actual virtual
MDP> folder you describe. Why req
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:06:09 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> As for the ticker as a ticker - IMHO it's irrelevant. As would be a
> boxed list of messages. I find it impossible to use it for pinpointing
> a start place for message reading or, with 100+ messages per sitting,
> as an overvi
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hi tracer,
On 21 January 2000 at 18:15:07 GMT +0700 (which was 11:15 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
t> So what about making it a box instead of a scrolling bar? I dislike
t> the scroll as I want to see more then one thing at the same time.
t> If essentially i
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 21:40:58 GMT +0800 (which was 13:40 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
MDP>> I couldn't survive without the ticker's virtual folder mechanism
MDP>> to group all that new email in created order and neatly
MDP>> threading acr
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:51:34 + GMT (21.01.2000, 18:51 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> I couldn't survive without the ticker's virtual folder mechanism to
MDP> group all that new email in created order and neatly threading across
MDP> accounts / folders. I real
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:51:34 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 5:51:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck> Hi Thomas,
Marck> On 21 January 2000 at 18:06:18 GMT +0800 (which was 10:06 where I
Marck> live) [EMAIL
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 18:06:18 GMT +0800 (which was 10:06 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
MDP>> (I think that's what you meant).
TF> Yes, it is. But I save the "drafts" (really only quotes) only if I
TF> think it will take a long time (having a lunch b
Hello Fred Weissman,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:09:18 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:09:18 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Fred Weissman wrote:
Fred> Has any thought been given to a feature (option?) whereby a message becomes
Fred> automatically marked as read once it h
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:51:44 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 10:51:44 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> Hi Fred,
Thomas> On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:09:18 -0500GMT (21/01/2000, 10:09 +0800GMT),
Thomas> Fred Weissman wro
Hi Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:45:22 +GMT (21/01/2000, 17:45 +0800GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> To expand on this, I do the same and hit Alt-F2 (or the "Save Draft"
MDP> button / menu option) immediately, thus parking the reply in the
MDP> OutBox. Any replies I subsequent
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 11:51:44 GMT +0800 (which was 03:51 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
FW>> I will often read through incoming mail quickly, and reply later.
TF> You have basically disabled the function of marking messages as
TF> "read" when you "re
Hi Fred,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:09:18 -0500GMT (21/01/2000, 10:09 +0800GMT),
Fred Weissman wrote:
FW> I will often read through incoming mail quickly, and reply later.
FW> Therefore, I have the account property 'time of reading to mark message as
FW> read' set to a very high number (999). Basic
Has any thought been given to a feature (option?) whereby a message becomes
automatically marked as read once it has been replied to? Since mail that
has been replied to is (usually) read, having the system mark it as such
would save a keystroke or two.
I will often read through incoming mail qu
26 matches
Mail list logo
