Hello Marck!
On Saturday, February 9, 2002 at 3:05:08 AM you wrote:
> No there wasn't. It was as simple as 'o' and TAB (which, on the second
> line, lines up with the indent on the first, etc.).
Smart Tabs enabled.*
*We will run into trouble shortly: Smart Tab, SmartBat, SmartPad -
anythyng a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rick,
On 08 February 2002 at 13:46:48 -0500 (which was 18:46 where I live)
Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> reply text here
> That is really cool, and I like it much better than how I was doing it
> where I
Hello Jonathan,
08. februar 2002, 22:28:31, you wrote:
JW> TB's Shift-F7 and Ctrl-F7 are like nothing else I've seen. I find
JW> them quite awkward (in general I prefer one handed keyboard short
JW> cuts.)
Look at Norton Commander's (and it's clones') editor :)
JW> 2) Reformatting a paragraph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rick,
On 08 February 2002 at 11:31:39 -0500 (which was 16:31 where I live)
Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Secnario II - Auto-Format On.
> Well now when I go back and add text things wrap fine, so
> ev
Hello Rick,
08. februar 2002, 19:46:48, you wrote:
>>> reply text here
RR> That is really cool, and I like it much better than how I was doing it
RR> where I would simply indent my response under the blocks of reply
RR> text. Your way looks much more clear.
This happened because your orig
Hello Jonathan!
On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 5:00:16 PM you wrote:
> Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the
> same way! The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_
> (keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need ex
Thanks Marck, your explanations are really helping me better
understand this ( even though I'm not totally getting the whole line
return thing, but that's just my ignorance, I'll work on understanding
it better ).
Totally not related to the topic, but Marck, did you modify your
reply template to
Hello Gerard!
On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 6:50:04 PM you wrote:
Mary>> 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive
Mary>> text editor?
> You better stand back and take cover :(
Another of the good tips to follow: Look for the word "editor" in the
archives:
ON Friday, February 08, 2002, 3:09:37 PM, you wrote:
Mary> 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive
Mary> text editor?
You better stand back and take cover :(
Mary> Otherwise, I really like it :-)
To late now ;-)
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Insert Cookie Here--
AS> I think the problem is that TB!'s editor is deliberately _not_ like
AS> other editors in many ways. That doesn't mean that it's wrong, but the
AS> ubiquity of Microsoft applications (and copies of the way they do
AS> things) exerts enormous hidden pressure to always do things the same
AS> way
On 08 February 2002 at 4:00 pm Jonathan wrote:
> Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the
> same way! The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_
> (keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need extension-specific
> conf
Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the
same way! The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_
(keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need extension-specific
configuration.
TB is actually pretty good, but it would be
On Friday, February 08, 2002, at 16:09:37, Mary wrote about:
Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)
>> I have a shortcut to fentun in a desktop folder. The shortcut
>> specifies "Start in" the same folder. I save my attachment to that
>> folder, open the folde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mary,
On 08 February 2002 at 15:48:07 +0100 (which was 14:48 where I live)
Mary Cassidy wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What I meant was that with Netscape and Eudora, for example, if you
> write a message and then add bits to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 08 February 2002 at 10:48:25 -0500 (which was 15:48 where I live)
David Denton wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I am finding the TB! editor is growing on me to the point that,
>after a month or so of using it,
Hello Mary,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:09:37 +0100GMT (8-2-2002, 15:09 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
MC> 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
MC> normal mailreaders do?
There is no 'like normal mailreaders do'. Recently somebody posted an
attachment with outlook 200
Hello Mary,
Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:48:07 AM, you wrote:
MC> I've given up using autoformat (or was it "justify on wrap"?), because
MC> it deletes the paragraph marks, and it's too much trouble to hit enter
MC> twice at the end of each paragraph.
MC> It may sound like no big deal, but when
On Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:48:07 AM, Mary wrote:
MC> What I meant was that with Netscape and Eudora, for example, if you
MC> write a message and then add bits to it, as most people do, the
MC> wrapping automatically puts itself right; you don't have to mess about
MC> with ALT-L or wade throu
Jernej Simončič wrote:
> MC> 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
> MC> normal mailreaders do?
> It already does that - normal mail readers don't support MS's
> proprietary format.
I don't have wide experience of other mailreaders, just Netscape and
Eudora, and I'v
Hello Mary,
08. februar 2002, 15:09:37, you wrote:
MC> 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
MC> normal mailreaders do?
It already does that - normal mail readers don't support MS's
proprietary format.
MC> 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly p
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
> Okay. It is a drop target. You have to save your attachment and drop
> it onto a shortcut to the fentun program. Then a window opens showing
> you the names of any attachments within the message.att file and you
> get the opportunity to extract them.
> I have a short
21 matches
Mail list logo
